Laptop Magazine’s Joanna Stern got to spend a couple hours playing with one of those newfangled XO Laptops preloaded with Windows XP the other day. Microsoft is offering Windows XP Starter Edition licenses for just $3 to customers in developing nations. On the one hand, this helps Microsoft fend off any challenges from Linux or other operating system in a largely untapped market. On the other hand, it also gives new computer users in developing nations access to the most widely used operating system in the world. And if the goal is to bridge the digital divide and encourage computer literacy, that matters.

The XO Laptop has just 1GB of flash memory onboard, which isn’t nearly enough to run Windows XP, so the operating system runs off of a removeable 4GB SD card. Eventually the OLPC developers will include a dual boot screen that lets users decide which operating system to boot into, but for now if the card is plugged in, you boot into Windows. If it’s pulled out, you but into the Linux-based Sugar OS.

Stern has posted a bunch of pictures of the XO running various Windows applications, as well as a few hands-on videos. In a nutshell, it sounds like the XO does a decent, if not steller job with Windows. It takes nearly 90 seconds to boot, slows down significantly if you have more than one window open, and online video playback is choppy. But if you launch just one or two programs at a time, it seems to work fairly well. In other words, the XO runs Windows XP about as well as a computer from 2000 would run it. While a faster processor would certainly help performance, the biggest bottleneck is probably the 256MB of RAM. Double or quadruple that and I’m sure the XO could do a better job of multitasking.

It’s unlikely that you’ll be able to pick up an XO running XP in developed nations in Europe or North America anytime soon. But when you think about it, without the OLPC we probably wouldn’t have had the Asus Eee PC, and without that this web site and all the topics I cover probably wouldn’t exist. So it’s worth keeping an eye on those crazy folks over at the OLPC Foundation because the stuff they’re working on today tends to be the stuff we all take for granted tomorrow.

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,463 other subscribers

6 replies on “XP on the XO: Needs more RAM”

  1. Well, I believe the goal was actually to create a robust and ubiquitous educational software platform for third-world children.

    It’s not clear what the author means by “bridging the digital divide”. What “bridging” software (for grade school children) is needed that the original GNU/Linux platform does not provide? Web browser? Email? Word processor? Instant messaging? Media players? Spreadsheet? Calculator? All of these are available on the GNU/Linux platform and use significantly less resources (RAM, disk, CPU cycles) than XP and its applications.

    As for computer literacy, it seems to me that true liiteracy means you understand the underlying principles, which are independent of any single vendor’s software. I don’t see how someone who is truely computer literate could argue that XP is essential for achieving computer literacy.

    In other words, the author’s argument is specious.

  2. In the comments JonCamfield asks if it is running anti-virus and anti-spyware software.

  3. what matters, as you put it, is giving people in these countries the chance to use computers productively without being beholden to a company in a foreign country and without artificial limits being placed on their knowledge. that is why xp is the worse possible choice for this computer and it pleases me greatly to find that there are also technical problems with it.

Comments are closed.