The United States Supreme Court has issued a ruling that could have wide implications for the sale of used and refurbished products.

Printer maker Lexmark had sued a company called Impression Products for patent infringement. Impression had been buying used Lexmark printer ink cartridges sold at low pries abroad, and then refilling and selling them in the US… for less than the price of a new Lexmark cartridge, potentially hurting Lexmark sales.

Impression argued that Lexmark had basically gotten its money the first time the cartridges were sold… and that the company couldn’t block resale of those items. In a ruling issued today, the Supreme Court agreed with that logic.

The ruling means you’ll likely be able to continue purchasing cheap third-party printer cartridges for printers from Lexmark and other companies.

But the decision also sets precedent that reaches far beyond printers-and-ink. The founder of online repair shop iFixit, for example, says that the ruling means manufactures can’t pursue patent cases against used parts resellers… like iFixit.

Essentially the Supreme Court has said that a patent holder “can no longer control that item through the patent laws” after one of its products is sold and “all subsequent owners are free to use or resell the product.”

That was already pretty clear in most cases… but the Court ruling examines whether patent owners can sell items “under an express restriction on the purchaser’s right to reuse or resell products” and enforce that restriction under patent law.

They cannot.

Selling an item outside the United States, where US patent law doesn’t apply, also leads to “patent exhaustion.”

There is one thing to keep in mind about this decision though: it only applies to the application of patent law. Lexmark (or other companies) can still try to enforce agreements under contract law.

Lexmark has an ink cartridge return program that allows customers to pay a lower price for ink if they agree to only return used cartridges to Lexmark. If they break that agreement by paying the lower price and then reselling cartridges to someone else, it’s not a violation of patent law… but that doesn’t mean Lexmark can’t sue for contract violations.

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign

or...

Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,533 other subscribers

3 replies on “Supreme Court: Patent holders can’t block resale of products (like printer cartridges)”

  1. Rich get richer, and sue if they don’t get their way.
    What else is new?

  2. printer companies have been thieves forever…just like the IRS, oil companies,, auto companies,,its never-ending..

  3. Of course if Lexmark wasn’t selling the cartridges at 95% margins they wouldn’t have a problem. The third party is only able to reprocess and resell because Lexmark’s margins give them so much room to work with.

Comments are closed.