The One Netbook One Mix 2S Yoga looks nearly identical to its predecessor, the One Mix Yoga. But the new model supports USB Type-C charging, has a fingerprint sensor, and sports a much faster processor and speedier storage — and the upgrades result in significantly better performance.

It turns out that’s not the only thing that’s different — the new model also has slightly better out-of-the-box support for Ubuntu 18.04 Linux.

When I tested Ubuntu on the original One Mix Yoga I noted that WiFi, touch, and pen input all worked, but audio did not.

I tried the same version of Ubuntu on the upgraded model and sound worked just fine. I was able to control the volume using keyboard shortcuts and I had no problem hearing audio while streaming videos from YouTube.

The computer also automatically shut off the keyboard when the screen was pushed all the way back, which prevents you from accidentally typing when holding the computer in tablet mode. Unfortunately there’s nothing to stop you from accidentally hitting the power button, which is located in the top right corner of the keyboard, so you’ll just need to learn to avoid it.

In order to test Ubuntu, I prepared a liveUSB, plugged it into the One Mix 2S Yoga’s single full-sized USB port, turned on the computer and pressed Fn+F7 when the One Netbook logo popped up to get a boot menu. From there I just selected my boot device (the flash drive) and waited a few moments for the operating system to load.

Like most other devices in this form factor, there are a few hurdles to running Linux. The first is that there’s no automatic screen rotation. The second is that by default the computer positions the display in portrait orientation — everything looks sideways.

You can fix that in Ubuntu by opening a terminal window and typing “xrandr -o right” (without the quotation marks) to rotate the display to landscape. But if you push the screen back and try to hold the One Mix 2S Yoga like a tablet, you’ll be stuck in landscape unless you manually change the screen orientation again.

Another problem is that Ubuntu doesn’t natively detect the screen as having a high pixel density, so everything looks really, really tiny. You may be able to get around that by installing a different GNU/Linux distribution or by using something like the Ubuntu Tweak Tool. But since I only tested Linux by running from a LiveUSB, I didn’t spend a lot of time looking for ways to change the display scaling.

I also haven’t run any extensive tests to see how battery life with Ubuntu compares to the 3-4 hours of run time I’m getting while using Windows on the machine.

Finally, while the keyboard and optical touch sensor (which is used instead of a touchpad) work just fine, touchscreen and pen input can be a little finnicky. That’s probably at least partially due to the display scaling issue. But overall I find that if you want to use the One Mix 2S Yoga primarily in laptop mode, Ubuntu seems to work just fine. Switching to tablet mode and relying on touch input seems slightly less feasible, but folks with better Linux troubleshooting skills than mine may find workarounds.

The One Mix 2S Yoga features an Intel Core M3-8100Y processor, 8GB of RAM, 256GB of PCIe solid state storage, and a 6,500 mAh battery. It has a 1920 x 1200 pixel IPS touchscreen display, 802.11ac WiFi, Bluetooth 4.0, and support for an optional pressure-sensitive pen.

The tiny laptop is a little small to use for general purpose work, but it weighs just over a pound and isn’t much larger than a smartphone, making it easy to carry with you to places you might not normally take a laptop. The best computer for the job is probably the one you’re most likely to carry with you all the time.

Geekbuying provided Liliputing with the demo unit featured in this article, and the retailer is currently selling the One Mix 2S + pen for $670, but the first 100 people to use the coupon code liliput2s can pick one up for $660 (note that the price goes up after Black Friday).

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,501 other subscribers

14 replies on “Running Ubuntu 18.04 on the One Mix 2S Yoga mini laptop”

  1. “3-4 hours of run ”
    thats short, enough for watching a movie on toilet, but thats about it

  2. Hey Brad, would it be possible for you to try running chromium os from usb on it (either cloudready or, even better, a recent release form arnold the bat) ? It would be extremely useful for some. of us who are considering to buy a little machine like this one to run chrome os on it.

    1. If you want to run Chromium OS or Chrome OS then I suggest you get One Mix Yoga version 1.
      The processor should be fast enough. You will save money and get much better battery life.

      1. No thanks. I’m also interested in how well Chromium OS runs on this. The processor will not, in fact, be fast enough, because the plan will be to dual boot. Chromium for browsing and email, Windows for light gaming and light audio work, like MIDI programming drums.

      2. How much better is the battery life of the One Mix Yoga version 1 in comparison to the newer versions roughly?

  3. 3-4 hours of run time I’m getting while using Windows on the machine

    That’s a really short battery life. Is that the same as other similar devices that’s been released?

  4. Ran similar tests with One Mix 2 Yoga. It’s practically identical, just with 7y30 instead of y8100, and these CPUs are almost the same (+10% base clock in exchange for 10% default TDP, not saying much).

    Fn+7 didn’t work for me, entering BIOS by pressing del and booting from there worked. The machine has secure boot off by default, but refuses to load from MBR thumb drive, so go for GPT/UEFI.

    I ran Void Linux live-USB (because I like it) with Mate (it just happened I had it downloaded). Everything worked out of the box — sound, shortcuts, wi-fi, you name it, except for display.

    The display is, as usual, from a smartphone, so it’s not 1920×1200, it’s 1200×1920. Curiously, at Windows it’s named “generic LCD 1024×768). There’s an option in the BIOS to set what default rotation to use, but, sadly, it does not extend to Linux.

    Well, fear not. xrandr turns the screen properly, shows the InvertX and InvertY trick right on the sidebar and the tapping is just the small matter of fiddling with evdev.

    However, the “idle” discharge rate on Windows as measured by AIDA64 was about 3.8-4W for me, while on Linux as measured by Mate battery info it for some reason hovered around 6.5W. As the laptop has only 32Wh, well, that makes a world of difference.

    It is a very superfluous test and I don’t intend to run Linux on it anyway (it’s for Moverio glasses), but it looks like Linux buyers should better wait for more in-depth testing runs.

      1. You’re welcome.

        A looked into Windows 10 powercfg report and it effectively says that for 51 minutes in Void Linux the laptop spent ~5.2W. It was light usage by Linux standards, some packages installed, some terminal fiddling, mostly browsing. So the actual average was about 6.2-6.3W (and Mate battery monitor was off quite significantly) at the same screen brightness or about 5 hours to full discharge.

        The direct comparison is meaningless as workloads are different (and no attempt to optimize the consumption was made on Linux), but I’m fairly positive that if you want to run Linux on this laptop you kinda want to compile things from time to time, get packages and so on, so about 5 hours is what to expect.

        The main difference seems to be the idle consumption, as 1.2-1.4W variance from display brightness, 0-3W from sustained I/O load, etc will eat the difference at the full load (that will probably drive this laptop into discharge in about 3 hours on both platforms).

Comments are closed.