Chinese company LeEco unveiled its first smartphone, smart TVs, and other products for the US market in October. At the time, the company laid out plans to launch a comprehensive ecosystem for its products, including cloud storage, streaming video, and other services that could be used across platforms.

Basically, LeEco wanted to emulate the success its had in China in the United States… a country where few companies other than Apple have really been able to build the kind of brand loyalty that makes that kind of ecosystem popular. Odds are if you have an Apple laptop, you also have an Apple phone… and maybe an Apple media streaming box.

So how’s it going for LeEco? According to recent news reports, not well.

Shortly after LeEco’s first products went on sale in the US, the company’s CEO sent a letter to employees noting that the company didn’t have the funds to support the pace of growth it was on track for.

In December the company reduced its workforce in India and scaled back operations in that country.

And now Reuters reports that LeEco is in talks to sell the 49-acre property in Silicon Valley that the company acquired from Yahoo in 2016. LeEco is also said to have already cut its US workforce by as much as half, so that it’s now at “more than 500,” which is a far cry from the 12,000 people LeEco had originally planned to house at the property it may now be looking to sell.

LeEco’s vision for the US market included plans for everything from existing products such as phones, TVs, headphones, and software services to upcoming products including self driving cars. LeEco has even developed smart bicycles. But it takes a lot of money to win big in a market like the US, and it looks like LeEco may be running out of that.

I also have to wonder if the company overestimated the demand for a new product ecosystem… I think many folks looked on with interest when LeEco promised high-quality smartphones with reasonably low prices, for instance… but were disappointed when they learned how much LeEco customized the Android software on those phones.

LeEco hasn’t confirmed the Reuters report about the possible property sale, but it does seem clear that the company is scaling back its ambitions for the US market. But that doesn’t mean LeEco is getting out of the consumer electronics space in the US altogether. The company also spent $2 billion to acquire TV maker Vizio last summer, and I doubt Vizio TVs are going anywhere anytime soon.

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,546 other subscribers

6 replies on “Report: LeEco downsizing plans for the US, selling Silicon Valley property”

  1. FYI, LeEco has not closed on the Vizio deal and word is it likely won’t happen.

  2. “… but were disappointed when they learned how much LeEco customized the Android software on those phones.”

    Yup, this may be OK in China, but most everyone else wants the phone makers to STOP CUSTOMIZING ANDROID!

    1. Yes, because the most selling smartphones are Nexus/Pixel phones with Stock Android. /irony off

      Personally I only like customized android (using MIUI), stock is so boring and ugly

      1. Skinned OS was the best option, because even the phenomenal ICS 4.0.3 had its omissions in its time.

        But ever since Android 5.1 (which fixed all the frustrating bugs from 5.0)… Stock OS Android has been a charm. In fact, it made Skinned OS look all childish, non-professional, and not well optimised.

        And the best part about it was, supporting a Stock OS is much easier for companies. To the extent where it is actually possible for them to roll out updates within 2 months of AOSP release, and actually support the software updates for 24 months after release.

        Unfortunately, very little OEMs care about timely updates or long-term support.
        So people should now either flock to iPhones, build their own OS, or just get Pixel/OnePlus/etc etc devices. No point in having the best hardware out there if the software experience is crap.

        (with that said, one of my favourite Skinned OS is actually FlymeOS)

  3. well not like i didn’t see this coming.. their not profitable yet .. why did they think they could make money on a US expansion when they are selling the product essentially at cost of components

  4. I was interested when they came in but quickly got tired of digging to find information on the confusing product offering. Prices tied up in special weird promotion. A software ecosystem which was vague. Some seemed to be Android TV – which I’d like – but then they wouldn’t actually say that out loud it seemed.
    I’m only willing to work just so hard to buy something from you regardless of whether it might be a good deal or not.

Comments are closed.