Google can already roll out some new features to Android devices through the Play Store, but updating apps like Google Keyboard, Search, Maps, or Play Services. But major security updates and new operating system features typically require an operating system update — and those are harder for Google to roll out on its own, since it usually needs to work with device makers.

But starting with Android 10, Google will be able to roll out some security updates through the Play Store.

That means you won’t be at the mercy of your device maker and could get some updates on Samsung, LG, or Motorola phones just as soon as they’re available for Pixel devices.

Google calls its new quick-security-update feature Project Mainline.

Here’s the idea. There are a series of Android components, or “modules” that can be updated much the same way apps are already updated. You just download the latest version from Google Play in the background and install them automatically. You won’t even need to reboot your phone.

Updates are delivered through the Play Store either as APK files (like other Android apps) or as APEX files, a new file format that’s a lot like an APK, but which is designed to load earlier in the boot process, allowing Android system components to be packaged as easy-to-update APEX files.

Project Mainline will allow Google to push updates to all users as soon as they’re available… assuming they ship with Android Q or later. Phones that ship with an earlier versions of the operating system won’t be compatible, even if they receive an Android Q update. And Google will apparently allow some manufacturers to opt out, although it’s not clear why they would want to do that.

According to The Verge, there will be 14 modules that Google can update at launch, so there will likely be some security updates that still require a full-fledged operating system update. But Project Mainline seems like a pretty good next step toward making non-Google Android devices a little more secure.

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,543 other subscribers

6 replies on “Project Mainline could bring quicker security updates to Android devices (no reboot required)”

  1. > Google will apparently allow some manufacturers to opt out

    Google will allow some manufacturers to opt out of *security updates*. I remember when the FBI issued a statement that users should stop using Internet Explorer (I think it was version 6) because of the security hell-hole it had become.

    The news is littered with foreign villains of the week precisely because of security concerns. Yet here we are continuing to give free passes to favored partners which expose us all.

  2. “And Google will apparently allow some manufacturers to opt out, although it’s not clear why they would want to do that.”
    It is called control. Manufacturers may be afraid if they do not control all of the updates users might end up with unintended benefits. I.E. less need to upgrade their phones every 2 years = lost sales.

  3. It’s crazy that we’ve had Android for a decade and this is still a major issue.

    1. The benefit of having loose quality control on any industry, it means that market is allowed to boom without much consideration for the consumer. It generally keeps prices low and availability high, but it can always be improved by some regulation (be it private or parliament).

      On the other hand, proponent for “free markets” argue that a tightly regulated industry usually causes few companies to win, leads to higher prices, less competition, flaky quality, and emergence of monopolies.

      1. The tech industry (including the video game industry) is the least regulated industry in existence, yet literally exhibits all the traits that proponents of free markets argue would occur with regulation.

        The proof is in the pudding, as they say.

Comments are closed.