Hardware hacker and bunnie huang’s latest project is an open source video board aimed at developers. It’s called the NeTV2 and it supports 1080p video at 60 Hz, features two HDMI ports, and is powered by an FPGA and 512MB of RAM.

The NeTV 2 board also includes PCIe 2.0 x4 connectors, allowing it to be used with a computer to offload work to an external GPU, and it aso has a JTAG/UART header that allows it to be plugged into a Raspberry Pi.

It’s an incredibly versatile little video machine that could theoretically be used to provide an overlay to existing video sources. For example, you could use it to add subtitles to movie streams, translate on-screen text in real-time, or block ads.

But right now some of those capabilities are limited… because of US law. Huang is launching a crowdfunding project for the NeTV2 in part to aid a lawsuit against the US government to remove some of those restrictions. The idea is to show that there’s demand for devices that are capable of providing innovative new features that are currently restricted by law in the United States.

The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act includes a provision that makes it illegal to bypass encryption. The idea was to protect copyright holders, but bunnie huang, and others, argue that existing US copyright law already offered tools to do that… and DMCA Section 1201 basically stifled innovation by making it illegal to bypass encryption even for personal use.

His argument is that there are things bypassing encryption can let you do beside pirating movies and TV shows.

Huang, along with Johns Hopkins University researcher Mathew Green and the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a lawsuit against the US Justice Department in 2016, but one of the arguments that’s been made against the group is that “no other users have specified how they are adversely affected by HDCP in their ability to make specific noninfringing use of protected content.”

So Huang developed the NeTV 2 board, which currently offers two modes: a “classic” mode which allows you to do certain things (such as adding an opaque text overlay to live video streams) without decoding/decrypting the video and a “libre” mode which offers more functionality, including the ability to alter pixels in real-time to do things like replace text on the display.

For now, Libre mode only works with unencrypted video streams. But if the lawsuit is successful, you could theoretically use the NeTV2 or a similar device to bypass encryption and use these sorts of features with videos streamed by providers like Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, or your cable, fiber, or satellite provider.

There’s no guarantee that’ll ever happen, so the best reasons to buy the NeTV2 right now is because you’re satisfied with what it can do today… and you want to help huang demonstrate that there’s demand for this sort of product.

Prices start at $200 for an NeTV2 board, which is up for pre-order through a crowdfunding campaign at Crowd Supply. A pledge of $320 gets you a Quick Start bundle that includes the development board, a Raspberry Pi 3 B+, an 8GB solid state drive, and cables.

Neither model is expected to ship until May, 2019.

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,546 other subscribers

9 replies on “NeTV2 open video development board is also a tool in a legal fight against DRM (crowdfunding)”

  1. Just a small typo in the article: “specified how they ar adversely ” (missing “e” for “are”)

  2. US government policy for a long time now is to protect companies not consumers, he is going to lose this lawsuit again.

  3. My main issue with HDCP is that it adds extra hurdles for people actually paying for content. I just want to watch movies with the least amount of hassle. There’s a lot of hassle especially if you’re trying to play movies on/from a PC (worst on Linux). Will Huang’s lawsuit help in this area?

    I don’t have much interest in modifying the video itself.

  4. “because you’re satisfied with what it can do ==>>today<=="

    But will you be satisfied with what it can do when you finally receive the product not expected to ship before May 2019 (according to CNX Software), compared to alternatives which will be available in 12 months time???

    Only 512 MB of 32-bit wide DDR3-800 (which is old and slow by today's expectations) and only fast 100 Mbs not Gigabit ethernet and only up to HD 1920×1080@60 resolution when higher resolutions are becoming more mainstream, make this device seem out of date in May 2018 let alone in May 2019, all at a price which cannot be considered anywhere near a bargain.

    I guess the overpricing must be to help fund the legal battle.

    1. “Overpricing” also results from targeting a smaller audience, economies of scale, yadda yadda.

    2. What do you need more RAM for? This is not a general purpose computer. It’s made to do one thing, if 512MB is good enough for the developer, you shouldn’t care. Do you buy printers based on the amount of RAM and speed of the CPU it has?

      1. on a side note its actually important to have a fast cpu with lots of ram on a scanner/printer these days

        1. It’s good to have. But the main thing I look in a printer is that it print’s well and the supplies are cheap. If it works well with whatever’s stuffed in there I won’t even bother looking up how much RAM does it actually have.

  5. 512GB of RAM sounds a bit much, although we know you meant MB there.

Comments are closed.