The Microsoft Surface Pro X is a thin, light, and fanless tablet with built-in support for 4G LTE. It’s also the device to ship with a Microsoft SQ1 processor, which is basically a custom version of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8cx.

Microsoft unveiled the Surface Pro X just over a month ago, and now it’s available for purchase for $999 and up.

Is it worth the asking price? That probably depends on what you’re looking for…but early reviews seem to suggest that the answer for most folks is probably not.

The starting price gets you a tablet with a 13 inch, 2880 x 1920 x pixel touchscreen display, 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage.

You can pay extra for up to 16GB of RAM, up to to 512GB of storage, and optional accessories including a keyboard cover and/or Surface Slim Pen.

That means a top-of-the-line model can easily set you back $2,000 or more.

Weighing in at 1.7 pounds and measuring about 0.28 inches thick, the tablet is… really about the same size as the Intel-powered Surface Pro 7 (which is 0.33 inches thick and 1.7 pounds), but it has a slightly larger display, slimmer bezels, and a fanless design.

What it doesn’t have is native compatibility with just about every Windows app.

One of the differences between Windows 10 on ARM and earlier ARM-based versions of Windows is that you can run most older Windows applications thanks to support for x86 emulation. But there’s some overhead required, which means that x86 apps run more slowly than those that are compiled for ARM — and Microsoft has had limited success convincing app developers to compile ARM versions of their programs.

Of course there’s a chicken-and-egg issue here: without many Windows on ARM devices on the market, there’s not much reason for app developers to support the platform. And without many apps, there’s not much reason for customers to buy the Windows on ARM devices that do exist.

So one of the reasons Microsoft released the Surface Pro X is clearly to tackle that issue head-on. It’s a premium tablet with one of the most powerful ARM processors to date. It shows what a Windows on ARM device can be. And if it becomes a popular item, then it could spur more development for the platform.

But right now if you buy one, you’re committing to a device that’s a little thinner than a Surface Pro 7, but which offers slower all-around performance and even slower performance still when it comes to running x86 apps.

Oh, and that’s just 32-bit apps. There’s no support for 64-bit x86 apps at all.

That’s not a huge issue since most older apps still offer 32-bit versions. But over time they’re likely to phase those out, which means that unless those same developers port their apps to ARM, the latest versions may not run on the Surface Pro X at all.

All of which is to say that buying the Surface Pro X is kind of gambling on a future that’s not quite here yet… and which may never arrive. That said, it’s not exactly a useless device.

Want always-connected 4G LTE capabilities, a tablet with a large screen and slim bezels, support for key apps including Microsoft Office, Edge, and OneDrive, and willing to pay a premium price for it? Then maybe you’re in the (likely small) target market for this tablet.

But if you want a faster computer that can run every Windows app and which offers comparable battery life and longer performance, then the Surface Pro 7 seems like a better bet.

It’s a little sad that this seems to be the story of every Windows on ARM device released to date. But while the Microsoft SQ1 processor seems to offer better performance than any Snapdragon chip to date, there just doesn’t seem to be a good reason to spend $1000+ to buy a tablet that doesn’t offer many tangible benefits over one with an x86 processor in terms of battery life, performance, cost, or portability while suffering from an app gap.

Read reviews at CNBC, CNET, CNN, Engadget, Gizmodo, NYTimes, Petri, and The Verge

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,448 other subscribers

10 replies on “Microsoft’s ARM-powered Surface Pro X is now available for $999 and up”

  1. Can we not call everything “apps”? Apps are from the mobile world and talks about very simplified software that typically only does one thing.

    Applications are full fledged apps such as Microsoft Office.

    1. Agree, a limited product such as this needs to be about $500 or so before I would even look at it with reasonable specs such as a full Hd screen and 256gigs of ssd storage…no need for more than that.

  2. Any news on a Surface Go LTE update? Maybe it’ll use that Lakefield SoC and still be fanless. I wouldn’t mind an ARM SoC if the performance of native applications is better than on the current Go.

    1. I wonder if MS will similarly create an ARM version of the 10″ Surface along with continuing with an Intel one. If I can get a 10″ Surface with LTE with the following, then I’d replace my current Go LTE:
      – Longer battery life.
      – Thinner to better slip into my packed backpack.
      – Smaller bezels since I don’t use it as a tablet anyway.
      – Instant on. The Go will hibernate after some time because sleep/suspend battery drain isn’t great and this can’t be disabled.
      – At least the same performance for native software.

  3. I believe the key point on this device lies in that always connected 4G-LTE. Unfortunately, that makes it more niche, good luck MS in selling this one, good concept but pricing is going to hurt it.

    1. I believe manufacturers don’t want too many earlier adopters which is why they only make high end models. WoA certainly has promise but it is still a work in progress.

    2. I just feel like I’m missing something with “always-on 4G LTE.” What am I going to do, get a PUSH notification in the Uber between the AirBNB and coWorking office location to check my…laptop?

      1. Very good point. I started to switch data off on my phone while I am driving. It’s not like I am going to write e-mails, or access some files on the shared drive.

Comments are closed.