Smartphones, tablets, and notebooks keep getting more powerful… but that doesn’t mean they have to become more power hungry. There’s a race on to make chips that don’t just offer higher performance, but which are also more efficient than previous models.

Intel’s been making pretty big strides in reducing power consumption with its Bay Trail and Haswell chips, and now the company’s taking aim at graphics processors. Intel is demonstrating a new 22nm tri-gate GPU that it says is 40 percent more efficient.

That could lead to mobile devices with longer battery life… or products with the same battery life but significantly more powerful graphics performance.

intel gpu

Here’s a roundup of tech news from around the web.

You can keep up on the latest news by following Liliputing on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook.

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,544 other subscribers

8 replies on “Lilbits (2-11-2014): Intel builds a GPU that’s 40 percent more efficient”

  1. I’m rooting for intel’s technology but not for the prices they would demand if they start to dominate. It almost seems like ARM is wanting to give their market away by not trying to provide/promote an open platform. If they had there’s no way intel would have any hope in mobile.

    1. I agree, if the closed is best thinking from ARM doesn’t improve a lot then they’re just waiting for Intel to take over in a few years. ARM vendors need to standardize more and contribute significantly to the Linux kernel and other open software.

  2. When the Baytail came out, I thought “the empire strikes back”. Still, I remember the days with Pentium 4 with focus on IPC and the move to lighter Pentium M and subsequent Core 2 Duo that saved Intel. On the other hand, AMD is going down hill with FX line, almost parallel to Intel’s Netburst era, struggling to keep the performance whilst keeping the power down, trying to squeeze the last few drops of IPC. Kaveri may see the benefit of HSA context switching, but AMD has already moved their server line to lighter Jaguar and ARM variants.

    I wonder how long Intel will continue with x86 line for mobile devices. But so far, they seem to be doing well on their own.

  3. Hmm. Maybe I’ll be getting an Intel powered smartphone in 1-2 years. Then I’ll say goodbye ARM. There are more Linux users than just Linus who would give ARM vendors the middle finger.

    What’re the next steps after Merrifield? Get rid of PowerVR and integrate generation 8 Intel GPUs? Integrate more than just LTE? Maybe have 3G, WiFi and GPS as part of the SoC?

      1. I don’t see ARM vendors improving the whole closed source drivers and only updating them for a short period situation which Luis alluded to. Meanwhile, Intel has been dedicating more and more resources to open source Linux drivers for their chips and general contributions to open source software. They now even have a dedicated team: .

        For ARM vendors, there’s just the typical few patches here and there. Also, there isn’t much standardization among ARM vendors making Linux support more difficult. There’s a new proposed standard that was announced earlier this month but that’s specifically targeted for server platforms.

    1. Present road map is 22nm Merrifield, which is coming out soon, then Moorefield may come out before the end of the year, and then next year we can look forward to 14nm Morganfield…

      So far Merrifield will definitely still use a PowerVR Series 6 Rogue GPU, like Apple’s A7 SoC, and will remain a dual core SoC, along with being the first to be paired with Intel’s LTE chip to finally be able to offer it for more than 3G markets… Moorefield will be the performance improvement as it will increase the core count to quad and will likely still go with the Imagination PowerVR GPU solution…

      We’ll have to wait and see if Intel will finally switch fully away from Imagination with Morganfield but by then Intel will have Gen 9 version of their GPU available… The power efficiency improvement should go a long way to making it viable for smaller devices like Smart Phones but the present Gen 7 and upcoming Gen 8 Intel GPU’s will only be seen from tablets on up…

      As to when we’ll see LTE, etc. integrated remains to be seen but Intel plans to go there eventually. Intel just haven’t revealed a planned schedule yet for when to expect it… However, it’s likely that it may take till Morganfield before we see any significant integration…

    2. Anandtech thought pretty highly of the Razr I (battery and speed were highlights of their review); I’d like to get an Intel phone one day, too.

Comments are closed.