When Intel introduced the first ultrabook designs last year, the company predicted that by the end of 2012 the thin and light laptops could account for 40 percent of all notebook sales. But according to research firm IHS iSuppli, that’s not likely to happen.

Earlier this year iSuppli predicted that PC makers would ship 22 million ultrabooks this year. But today the firm cut that prediction in half, suggesting that only about 10.3 million units will have shipped by year’s end.

Gigabyte Ultrabook

What’s more, iSuppli expects most of those ultrabooks to ship in the last quarter of 2012, after Microsoft Windows 8 is released. In other words, we’re more than 9 months into the year, and iSuppli figures we’re not even close to that 10.3 million figure yet.

There are a few things to keep in mind here. First, shipments aren’t the same as sales. So even if 10.3 million units are shipped to retail stores, it’s tough to tell how many people actually purchased ultrabooks to use for home or work.

Second, iSuppli is making an educated guess based on information from industry sources. But not all PC makers share this kind of information, so while iSuppli is pretty good about making guesses, these are still just guesses.

That said, iSuppli still expects shipments to pick up in 2013. The company is predicting we’ll see 44 million ultrabooks move next year (although that number is down from the 61 million iSuppli had been predicting).

Future ultrabooks are expected to have even more special features including optional touchscreens, detachable tablet portions, motion sensors, GPS, and more.

Ultrabooks are thin and light laptops with premium features including all-day (or nearly all-day) battery life, solid state storage (or at least a solid stat cache disk), and connected standby features that let you receive email messages and other status updates while the computer is sleeping.

Basically, they’re Intel’s idea of how to add tablet-like features such as thin size, instant-on, always-connected capabilities and long battery life to laptops to help convince people to buy a full-fledged laptop instead of (or in addition to) a consumer tablet.

Part of that equation is price. Intel sets guidelines for PC makers that want to call their devices ultrabooks, and one of the guidelines is that high end ultrabooks should be priced at or around $1000 or less… at least for an entry level model.

We’ve even started to see some models sell for as little as $599. But that’s still a lot of money at a time when consumers have gotten used to paying less for computers and consumer electronics. You can pick up a decent Android tablet for $199 or less. And it’s not hard to find a netbook for around the same price.

It’s possible that if ultrabook prices continue to fall and entry level models start to sell for less than the cost of an entry-level iPad, they could move better. But I’m not sure that’s what Intel or its hardware partners want to see happen.

Part of the reason they’re cramming all those extra features into ultrabooks is to offer a better user experience. But a big part of the reason is to convince shoppers that a good laptop is worth more than a few hundred bucks. And if iSuppli’s figures are accurate, it looks like Intel and PC makers are having a tough time selling that idea right now.

via CNET

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,543 other subscribers

3 replies on “iSuppli cuts 2012 ultrabook shipment estimates in half”

  1. The problem, still, is the price and the competition with Apple.

    Computers (laptops included) over $1000 represent 27% of the market (2009 stats). If we consider only laptops (over $1000), it’s about 10%.
    Apple’s market share is 91% of these retailed (businesses are not counted here since it’s a study made with BestBuy numbers) computers.


    I think they mistake market share with revenue share, but still.
    The average price for a Windows laptop sold in 2009 is $520.

    When you take all that into consideration, you realize that Intel and OEMs can’t simply increase the market for ultrabooks by adding features.

    The first problem is the price of these devices and the fact that a large majority of people simply can’t afford them.
    If I can’t put down $1000 for a laptop, you can implement all the features you want, I’ll still won’t be able to buy it.
    So, the prices have to keep on dropping, or they won’t sell.
    But Intel and OEMs don’t want that since they created the category ultrabook to, specifically, increase their margins.

    Second point is, ultrabooks, as they don’t magically create people who can afford them, have to compete with MacBook Air and Pro.
    And, most of the time, they just lose.
    Not because they aren’t as good as Apple products but because they don’t benefit of the same image and don’t have a faithful large customer base which prefers or is used to OSX.

    So, the equation should be simple.

    OEMs need to lower their margin and their price on the ‘low end’ spectrum of ultrabooks for them to attract more customers.
    They must work on image, quality and features on the higher end of ultrabooks to convince some Apple users to make the switch.

    But I have a better idea.
    Stop selling ultrabooks and just sell thin, light, powerful (enough) notebooks at notebook prices and everything will be good.
    Ultrabooks (and Intel chips) are overpriced, that’s it.
    They are simply thinner, lighter laptops.

    1. Dead on. Low end disruption is the way to undercut Apple. A RK3066 based version of the Android Book
      could be a real game changer.
      The current tablet SoC’s such as the Allwinner A10, AmLogic M3, and particularly the RK3066 have enough performance to do the majority of the tasks associated with laptop usage at a fraction of the cost.
      I’ve been playing with the Kimdecent T10 (basically a MK808 miniPC w/ Jelly Bean) and it is damn close to everything you need, short of video transcoding, on a laptop.

  2. Anyone know how the sales compare with similarly priced notebooks? Apart from being thinner, ultrabooks don’t really have much advantages over regular notebooks. At those prices, notebooks can have SSDs or hybrid HDDs, all the Intel features (it’s the same chipset afterall), better battery life (bigger or extended batteries aren’t as constrained by the thickness), touchscreen, motion sensor, GPS, full-sized and more ports.

Comments are closed.