Intel has been offering cheap, low-power processors for entry-level laptops since the company unveiled the first Atom chip for netbooks way back in 2008. The company doesn’t use the Atom name any more, but entry-level Celeron and Pentium Silver chips in the company’s Gemini Lake line use Atom-based architecture while higher-performance Pentium Gold processors are based on the same architecture as Intel’s “Core” processors.

Now it looks like Intel may be doing away with that distinction… at least for some of its upcoming entry-level chips.

Phoronix was examining some new code for Intel’s open source Linux graphics driver and spotted some clues suggesting that the follow-up to Gemini Lake will be at least partially based on the same technology and Intel’s upcoming 10th-gen Core “Ice Lake” chips.

Among other things, it looks like next-gen Celeron and Pentium Silver chips will feature Intel Gen11 integrated graphics, which would be a big step up from the Intel UHD Graphics 600 technology used in Gemini Lake processors.

It could also mean that Intel’s next-gen entry-level processors will be manufactured using a 10nm process instead of 14nm.

But that doesn’t necessarily mean that a budget Celeron chip will offer the same level of performance as a more expensive Core m3, Core i3, or Core i5 chip.

The follow-up to Gemini Lake is said to be code-named “Elkhart Lake,” and it’s expected to pair a set of low-power CPU cores with higher-power cores, much the way ARM’s big.LITTLE technology allows smartphone chip makers to offer multi-core chips that balance energy efficiency and performance.

The “big” cores in Elkhart Lake processors will likely use the same “Sunny Cove” microarchitecture as Intel’s Ice Lake processors. But there will also be “little” cores using the new Intel “Tremont” microarchitecture.

Still, if nothing else, the move to Gen11 graphics could mean next-gen budget PCs will have better support for gaming, virtual and augmented reality, and video rendering, and other GPU-intensive tasks.

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,455 other subscribers

6 replies on “Intel’s next-gen Celeron and Pentium chips for budget devices could be way more powerful”

  1. This will be huge for battery life. This would make a lot of sense even with high-end notebook CPUs. Windows itself can run pretty well on a measly Atom Z3735F, as long as you don’t do anything on it.

    1. The best of the Intel Atoms the X7 / Z8750…. is the bare minimum in my books.
      It runs Windows10 Pro and 2 Apps at the same time without a hiccup.

      But throw too many browser tabs, a huge spreadsheet, or any 3D Game past 2005 and it struggles and dies. Not sure how people live/recommend even slower processors, maybe I’m just spoilt?

  2. Cool, but I just want them to hurry up and reveal their next gen Core Ms with Gen 11 graphics. The only low power CPU that could give a decent performance boost over the old 7y30 would be a proper successor using the 10nm (or just go straight to 7nm) process and gen 11 graphics, but only if the entire line of gen 11 iGPUs have gained a big boost over gen 9 and not just the goddamned Irises.
    We won’t get a Win 3 until this happens. Probably.

  3. Can’t wait these chips to drop in 2020 and see chinese tablets in 2034 start using them /s
    But on a serious note it would be interesting if one of those surpassed the m3-8100y king.

Comments are closed.