Intel’s first chips based on the company’s new Gemini Lake architecture are here. The company is launching three new low-cost, low-power processors aimed at desktops and three aimed at notebooks.
These are the successors to Intel’s Apollo Lake processors, which first hit the streets last year, and the new models are expected to offer a slight performance boost, new graphics and video capabilities, and memory improvements.
Intel is also starting to use a new naming convention to help differentiate some of these chips from higher-performance variants based on Intel Core architecture.
For the last few years Intel has been using the Celeron and Pentium names to describe both chips based on the same low-cost, low-power architecture as its Atom processors, and on its higher-performance (and cost) Core architecture.
Now an Atom-based Pentium is called Pentium Silver, while a Core-based Pentium is called Pentium Gold. That saves you the trouble of looking up a model number if you want to figure out what kind of Pentium chip you’re looking at. Unfortunately there’s still no easy way to tell whether you’re looking at a Gemini Lake Celeron or a Core-based one without looking at the model number.
Anyway, if you’re wondering why you’d want the less powerful Pentium Silver rather than Pentium Gold, here’s a hint: Intel describes them as “the cost-optimized option in the Pentium processor family,” while Pentium Gold chips are higher-cost models based on Intel Kaby Lake (Core) architecture.
All Gemini Lake chips now include support for Gigabit WiFi (802.11ac 2×2 connections with 160 MHz channels), a new Local Adaptive Contrast Enhancement technology to make it easier to view computer screens outdoors, and Intel says you should be able to get up to 10 hours of playback while watching HD video on a device with a Gemini Lake processor an a 35 Wh battery.
Here’s a run-down of the new chips:
- Celeron N4000 – 2.6 GHz dual-core/dual-thread with 650 MHz Intel UHD 600 graphics
- Celeron N4100 – 2.4 GHz quad-core/quad-thread with 700 MHz Intel UHD 600 graphics
- Pentium Silver N5000 – 2.7 GHz quad-core/quad-thread with 750 MHz Intel UHD 605 graphics
- Celeron J4005 – 2.7 GHz dual-core/dual-thread with 700 MHz Intel UHD 600 graphics
- Celeron J4105 – 2.5 GHz quad-core/quad-thread with 750 MHz Intel UHD 600 graphics
- Pentium Silver J5005 – 2.8 GHz quad-core/quad-thread with 800 MHz Intel UHD 605 graphics
Note that all of those CPU and graphics speeds are the top speeds available on those respective processors. All of the chips have 4MB of cache and support for DDR4-2400 and LPDDR4-2400 dual channel memory
35Wh is a 3.7V x 10Ah battery cell… that’s a pretty big battery. But then again, we’re talking 10 hours of HD video playback.
What’s the power consumption or TDP of the notebook targeted chips?
Was about time! J5005 NUC will be interesting for correct price.
Intel’s Pentium N5000 benchmarks on Geekbench4 leaks, example https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/5315637 single core breaking 2000+ points easily and multicore almost touching Intel’s Core m3-7Y30. Also that is almost double Intel’s Cherry Trail and Braswell results, example https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3121374 Took another two generations to almost double the performance? Some real world reviews required soon.
Yes, but is the double performance of Cherry Trail coming at the cost of x2-x3 of battery drain?
On desktop, it doesn’t matter.
But for ultra-mobile (phones, tablets, netbooks) that trade-off is undesirable.
Unless we’re comparing Cherry Trail (Celeron rebrand) to Core i (Pentium-Gold rebrand), in which case, it isn’t an apples to apples comparison.
Like Intel’s previous Apollo Lake, that didn’t stop ODMs from using them on tablets or notebooks. If made correctly then can expect good battery life, example https://www.notebookcheck.net/Dell-Latitude-3189-N4200-HD-Convertible-Review.213692.0.html These chips can be good cheaper alternatives to higher priced premium chips. Most interesting is that GNA block inside the chip, some literature on that GNA here https://sigport.org/documents/implementation-efficient-low-power-deep-neural-networks-next-generation-intel-client Can only guess the purpose of that GNA block there, otherwise its a mysterious addition.
I believe I read that these new processors will require a new motherboard. Probably not a big factor on the low end of things but it might take a bit longer for these to hit the market if they cannot be slotted into existing designs.
I wonder if we will see any Mini ITX boards with integrated J5005 CPUs. If there was one with a PCIe slot, it could make a decent low end gaming PC if combined with a decent GPU.
There were a lot of very cheap boards with the older N4200 processor so I would expect this to be repeated. The catch is the cost of a Windows licence which generally makes it cheaper to buy a full PC from the likes of Voyo.
Do Voyo PCs have PCIe slots?
With dedicated WiFi and Bluetooth I/O connection, all the PCI Express lanes should be free. Now depends on the motherboard manufacturer whether they want to include a PCI Express slot.
The “Top Speed” listing is deceptive considering the change to their high-end processors listing the base speed and 1-core turbo if you dig into the model number. Here is the i7-8700K on the Ark, billed in ads as “3.2 GHz / 4.6 Turbo.
Comments are closed.