Intel’s Compute Stick is a tiny computer-on-a-stick that’s small enough to hold in one hand or slide into your pocket. Plug the HDMI connector on one end into a display and you can turn just about any screen into a PC.

The first Compute Stick began shipping recently and it features an Intel Atom Z3735F Bay Trail processor, 2GB of RAM, 32GB of storage, and Windows 8.1 software. It sells for about $150, and Intel will release a cheaper, Linux-powered model with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of storage soon.

But what’s next for the Compute Stick? According to a leaked roadmap we’ve received, quite a bit!

compute stick roadmap

Cedar City (Core M Compute Stick in 2015)

Later this year Intel will launch the first Compute Stick with an Intel Core M processor. We knew it was coming, but what we didn’t know until now is that the next-gen Compute Stick, code-named “Cedar City” will have some other big improvements as well. It features:

  • Intel Core M processor
  • 4GB of RAM
  • 64GB of SATA storage
  • USB 3.0
  • 802.11ac WiFi
  • Support for 4K displays
  • MHL

The MHL feature means the Cedar City model will be able to draw power from the HDMI port on TVs that support MHL. You won’t have to use a micro USB cable to power the stick.

Intel only plans to offer a Windows version of the Cedar City Compute Stick, but I suspect you’ll be able to install Ubuntu or other GNU/Linux operating systems on your own.

Fall City 2 (Intel Atom Broxton Compute Stick in 2016)

In early 2016, Intel will launch “Fall City 2” models, which replace the current Compute Stick models (which are, not surprisingly, code-named Falls City).

These sticks will feature Intel Atom chips based on the upcoming “Broxton” architecture. In other words, don’t hold your breath waiting for an Intel Compute Stick with a Cherry Trail chip. It’s not coming. Instead Intel is skipping Cherry Trail and designing its next-gen Compute Sticks on the CPUs that will launch after Cherry Trail.

That doesn’t mean we won’t see Cherry Trail-powered PC Sticks. There’s nothing stopping other computer makers from building them. But they don’t seem to be part of Intel’s roadmap.

Falls City 2 should offer better performance than today’s Compute Sticks thanks to their next-gen processors. They’ll also feature USB 3.0 ports for faster data transfers, MHL support for connecting to a display without a separate power cable, and these models will support 4K displays thanks to improved graphics.

Intel will offer Linux and Windows versions of the Falls City 2 sticks. The Linux model still has just 1GB of RAM and 8GB of eMMC storage, but the Windows model will ship with 2GB of RAM and 64GB of eMMC storage.

thanks Olivier!

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,536 other subscribers

20 replies on “Intel Compute Stick roadmap: Core M and 64GB model in 2015, Broxton models in 2016”

  1. Intel supported TPP, the “trade” agreement that greatly undermines Democracy. Screw Intel!

  2. Wow SATA bus for the Cedar City. I wonder if it is going to be an M.2? Probably not, but I can dream.

    1. No. It doesn’t need the price or power requirement increase for what they are meant to do.

  3. Why oh why do they keep resource starving Linux variants like that?!

    1. Me too! Turn my Motorola Lapdock 100 into a tiny, lightweight, full-power computer!!!

      1. Won’t work. I currently have a Intel Stick running on my Lapdock Bionic, and it draws too much power to be powered by the lapdock. The lapdock can put out 0.5A to 1.0A. The stick (current model) draws 1.5A-2A on boot.
        I’d imagine the Core M version would draw even more power. It sucks, but you could always pick up a battery for the device itself.

          1. I connect the compute stick to the wall, so the lapdock doesn’t power it. However, I also have 5V 3A battery that I use with it too.
            The lapdock just doesn’t provide enough power 🙁 Maybe it could be hacked in someway or something.

          2. How do you manage accesing the touchpad and the keyboard on the lapdock if you use the USB power in on the stick with the external power? guess thy should be controlled uith the micro usb male point of the lapdock

          3. I use a Micro USB female to USB Male adapter cord. It connects from the laptop ports to the USB in on the Intel Stick.

    1. an atsc tuner built in would be redundant on a tv, that has a atsc tuner. there are usb atsc tuners, i have one on my laptop and it works great.
      cell phones need a atsc app, but the antenna would have to be external…

  4. Launching a computer in 2016 with 1GB of RAM seems wrong.

    1. why? Windows 10 works just fine on it… And it will be a cheap stick device. Most people won’t need more for the use of these. They will be more then capable of powering the tasks needed.

        1. “Nobody will ever need more than 64k of ram” -My science teacher, referring to the Commodore 64

Comments are closed.