The makers of the OnePlus One announced plans recently to bring their smartphone to India. But while the version sold in most parts of the world features a custom version of Android developed by Cyanogen, OnePlus is working on a different Android-based operating system for its Indian customers.

Still, the original plan had been to ship phones with Cyanogen OS and then roll out new firmware through a software update. But an Indian court has put a stop to those plans: OnePlus has been barred from selling its phone in India, at least for now.

12/24/2014 Update: The Delhi High Court has overturned that ruling.

oneplus one

The court order prevents OnePlus from “marketing, selling, and shipping” phones in India if it has the Cyanogen mark on it, although any remaining inventory that’s already in the country can be “disposed of.”

At issue is a deal Cyanogen has stuck with a rival phone maker. Micromax plans to launch a new brand called Yu Digital today in an attempt to offer high-quality phones at mid-range prices. Those phones will be powered by Cyanogen software and Micromax and Cyanogen have an agreement that says Micromax will have exclusive rights to Cyanogen OS in the country.

That means no other companies can ship phones with Cyanogen OS.

Note that there’s a difference between Cyanogen OS and CyanogenMod. The latter is an open source operating system based on Google Android that’s maintained by a community of independent developers. But after a few years of working on CyanogenMod, the founder of the project and a small group of developers created a for-profit company that produces a commercial version of the operating system called Cyanogen OS.

It’s still based on open source software, but Cyanogen OS includes proprietary code and unlike CyanogenMod it has Google Mobile Services certification which allows companies such as Micromax and OnePlus to ship devices that have the Google Play Store and other Google apps pre-loaded.

In other words, the Indian court ruling isn’t preventing anyone from installing CyanogenMod on their own phones. But it could stop OnePlus from selling its phones in the country… at least until it replaces Cyanogen software on its devices with a different version of Android.

You can read the court documents for more details. It’s a pretty engaging read, and includes emails between folks at OnePlus and Cyanogen that shows just how messy things got between the two companies (as well as a threat from Cyanogen to stop supporting OnePlus phones around the globe and not just in India).

Meanwhile, OnePlus is celebrating its first birthday, seeking input on a name for its new OnePlus ROM/firmware and launching a 10,000mAh portable power bank that’ll sell for $15.

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,506 other subscribers

2 replies on “Indian court bans OnePlus from selling phones with CyanogenMod”

  1. Perhaps more went on here than the public knows about. But from the outside this looks like Cyanogen just put its boot into the teeth of the first company to bring them up to the big show. That does not seem like a great way to do business when you are just starting to do business. Or have I completely missed some aspect of this?
    I also very much wonder what their patent shielding is like now that they are selling an OS. Cyanogen mod is great stuff but it’s a lot different being an underground player than running it as a business. I would think it would involve a lot more lawyers.

  2. Maybe they can celebrate by getting their crap together so consumers aren’t totally confused.

Comments are closed.