When JBL and Lenovo launched smart displays powered by Google Assistant this summer, the companies tapped into a platform Google announced at the start of the year.

But when Google launched its own smart display this week, the company didn’t follow suit.

The Google Home Hub is a $149 smart display with a 7 inch touchscreen display, a built-in speaker, and a mic array. You can use it to talk to Google Assistant, play videos or music, or control your smart home gadgets.

You can’t use it to make video calls, because the Google Home Hub does not have a camera. That’s not the only thing that sets it apart from other Google Assistant-enabled smart displays though.

As Ars Technica points out, Lenovo, JBL, and LG have all announced devices based on the same technology: they all have Qualcomm SD624 chips and run software based on Google’s Android Things (a version of Android optimized for Internet of Things devices).

The Google Home Hub, meanwhile, uses an Amlogic processor and software that’s similar to what runs on a Google Chromecast device.

While the company hasn’t really explained the discrepancy, there’s one obvious difference: the Google Home Hub is the cheapest smart display with Google Assistant to date. JBL’s solution sells for $200 or more, and  Lenovo’s is $250.

Interestingly, most of the differences seem to be under the hood. The Google Home Hub user interface seems to be pretty much the same as for the  Lenovo Smart Display and JBL Link View.

Meanwhile, 9to5Google connected some dots and concluded that there’s a chance the Google Home Hub may be capable of running Google’s new Fuchsia operating system rather than an Android-based OS. It’s unclear if the Home Hub runs Fuchsia out of the box, but it appears that the company has at least been testing the operating system on the device.

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,532 other subscribers

4 replies on “Google Home Hub uses different software than other Google Assistant smart displays”

  1. The software will change the whole industry dramatically in the future. Currently, all type of business drive with high tech software such as restaurant management, retail management, hotel management, club management many others.

  2. These are still fairly overpriced if you consider that you likely need one for all of the rooms you spend time often.

    Something like $75 would be the price I would consider tolerable.

    1. Depends on your use case. Personally I would only use this in the kitchen (actual tv in the living room) and use a home mini in other rooms (e.g. Home mini + phone/tablet/tv in bedroom). Now if it had video call functions and could hand off the call to other devices as you moved throughout the house then maybe.

      1. To be fair, these devices are pointless and don’t help anyone.

        The exception are DIY people, who make their own RaPi and convert their house system to a “smart system”. Then these Google Assistant devices can be hacked into the server/network, and then become more useful.

        There’s some companies selling these full-conversion packages with installation but they’re only for the wealthy at the moment (think of Iron Man 1 stuff).

Comments are closed.