The first notebooks to hit the streets running Google Chrome OS were powered by Intel Atom low power processors. The good news is that means the Acer AC700 and the Samsung Series 5 Chromebooks get decent battery life. The bad news is that they feel surprisingly sluggish for computers that don’t really run much software beside the web browser.

But that sluggish performance could be a thing of the past (and present, since the AC700 and Series 5 are still available for purchase). Samsung started showing off an upcoming Cromebook with a faster Intel Celeron processor earlier this year. And now there’s evidence that future Chromebooks could have Intel Sandy Bridge or Ivy Bridge processors.

Samsung Series 5 Chromebook Celeron

The folks at Phoronix noticed some new code added to Chromium OS (the open source version of Chrome OS) recently. It adds Coreboot BIOS support for the chipsets used in Intel’s current Sandy Bridge line of processors as well as the company’s upcoming Ivy Bridge platform.

Coreboot is basically the open source boot environment that allows Chromebooks to load the operating system quickly. But the fact that Google is adding Coreboot support for faster Intel chips means that we might not only see faster boot speeds, but faster overall performance.

On the other hand, this could just be a sign that Google is hedging its bets in case any PC makers decide to release chromebooks with these processors. It doesn’t necessarily mean that there’s any new hardware in the works.

On yet another hand (what, how many do you have?) there is some evidence that Chromebooks with ARM-based processors are in the works. Developers have been submitting Chromium OS bug reports from a couple of unannounced machines including one with a Samsung Exynos processor. That computer is code-named “Daisy

via CNET

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,446 other subscribers

3 replies on “Future Chromebooks could have Ivy Bridge processors… maybe”

  1. New, more powerful chips should make Chromebooks even more attractive to potential buyers. As more people adopt Chromebooks more will also want to use them to access their Windows applications, especially for work.

    One possible solution for this requirement is Ericom AccessNow, an HTML5 RDP client that enables tablet users to connect to any RDP host, including Terminal Server, physical desktops or VDI virtual desktops – and run their applications and desktops in a browser.

    Ericom‘s AccessNow does not require any client or other underlying technology to be installed on end-user devices – an HTML5 browser is all that is required.

    You can choose to run a full Windows desktop or just a specific Windows app, and that desktop or Windows app will appear within a browser tab.

    For more info, and to download a demo, visit:

    Note: I work for Ericom

  2. Are they still going to have 10″ screens? If so, can Ubuntu or Windows be installed easily? Yeah, I’m just looking for a 10″ ultrabook.

    1.  Chromebooks are typically 11.6″ to 12.1″ in size and the idea is usually that you won’t be installing another OS.

      10″ Ultrabooks probably won’t really come out until next year with Intel Haswell based systems start showing up.

      Till then you can look at Sandy Bridge based systems from companies like Panasonic with their J10 series…  Not a Ultrabook as it’s about twice as thick as a netbook but it is a 10″ system… A bit on the pricey side though, but good run times.

Comments are closed.