Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chips power a huge number of smartphones and tablets, but 2015 has been a rough year for the company. Samsung opted to use its own processor in most of its flagship devices, and the flagship Snapdragon 810 processor has been widely criticized for performance issues.

So what’s next for Qualcomm? The company plans to launch its Snapdragon 820 processor in 2016, and the company says it should offer better CPU and graphics performance, support for faster LTE and faster charging, and many other improvements.

While we probably won’t see phones or tablets with the new chip for at least a few months, Qualcomm has started giving some journalists an opportunity to test a smartphone-sized developer kit with a Snapdragon 820 chip, and early previews look pretty promising.

snapdragon 820_02

The folks at AnandTech and Tom’s Hardware have published detailed previews of the new chip, looking at the processor’s architecture and performance. If you want to get into the nitty gritty, you should check our their articles.

Generally speaking though, Qualcomm’s first processor with its 64-bit Kryo CPU cores and Adreno 530 graphics delivered on its promise, offering significant performance gains over the Snapdragon 810 chip. It also bested Samsung’s Exynos 7420 chips in some (but not all) tests.

On the other hand, the Apple A9 processor used in the latest iPhones still seems to be the chip to beat for most tasks.

It’s also worth noting that when the Snapdragon 820 launches in 2016 it won’t only be competing with this year’s chips. Samsung, Huawei, MediaTek, and other companies will all be launching new processors in the coming year.

One key question hasn’t really been answered yet: will the new chip overheat? Most of the performance issues associated with the Snapdragon 810 seem to be related to the chip’s tendency to run hot. Ask your mobile device to work too hard and the processor heats up… and then it throttles its clock speeds for a while in order to cool off so that your device isn’t damaged.

While we won’t know for certain if the Snapdragon 820 suffers from similar thermal issues for a while, it’s interesting to note that the developer kit Qualcomm is showing off is the size of a 6.2 inch smartphone, suggesting that the company is confident the chip can be shown in its best light in a phone-sized device. Well, a large phone-sized device anyway. In the past Qualcomm has sometimes chosen to showcase its chips with tablet-sized developer kits.


Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,457 other subscribers

5 replies on “Early Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 test results look good”

  1. Qualcomm is an ARM Holdings (UK) licensee, as is anyone who makes a CPU
    based on any ARM instruction set (including Intel, which sold its ARM CPU
    business). Qualcomm;s global headquarters is in San Diego, and is a public US
    corporation (ticker: QCOM). Unlike the non-US companies mentioned
    previously, Qualcomm doesn’t have any parent company located outside the

    For tax considerations, many US companies have moved their offices
    offshore, or conduct substantial business out of locations elsewhere.
    Apple does it, but few would say Apple is a non-US company. Some people call

    such companies stateless multinationals, so yes, whether a company belongs to a
    particular country is a good question. After all, Mitt Romney said corporations are
    people too.

  2. Link says Ars Technica, but if you click on it it actually takes you to Anandtech (both are sites I frequent)

    1. Too many good sites with names that start with an A. 🙂 I have the same problem with Acer and Asus sometimes when I’m not paying attention.

  3. Hopefully Qualcomm has fixed the problems plaguing its earlier
    chips. Incidentally, the other companies mentioned, Samsung (South Korea),
    Huawei (People’s Republic of China), MediaTek (Taiwan) are
    non-US companies, so it would be nice to see American technological
    prowess reasserted.

    1. Qualcomm may have headquarters (somewhat) in the US, but it is really hundreds of companies mostly outside the US (US corporate taxes are the highest in the World – & that is just one reason to leave). I am pretty sure Qualcomm’s current Snapdragon SoC’s are based on licensed IP from ARM Holdings in the UK and are built (like most Qualcomm products) in Asia. The Adreno GPU in the Snapdragon line is getting long in the tooth now and was IP purchased from AMD, who bought with ATi. Qualcomm is pretty good (still) at doing radios on chips. But as the radios become more software-defined, that’s really a blunt edge for them going forward. Qualcomm has always been pretty strong in Korea, I would not be surprised to see Qualcomm jump from the US to Korea someday soon; if it is not purchased outright by a Korean firm.

Comments are closed.