Disclosure: Some links on this page are monetized by the Skimlinks, Amazon, Rakuten Advertising, and eBay, affiliate programs, and Liliputing may earn a commission if you make a purchase after clicking on those links. All prices are subject to change, and this article only reflects the prices available at time of publication.

Sony and Bose make some of the best noise-canceling wireless headphones around… if you want to spend $300 or more on a pair of headphones. Fortunately there are growing options for folks on a tighter budget.

Case in point: today you can pick up a pair of TaoTronics over-ear wireless headphones with active noise canceling functionality for just $50. Will they sound as good as the new $350 Sony WH_1000XM3 headphones? Of course not. But you can buy 7 sets of the TaoTronics headphones for the price of one set of Sony’s.

And if you do have your heart set on a pair of Sony headphones, Secondipity is selling refurbished WH-CH700N headphones for $70.

Here are some of the day’s best deals.


Batteries and charger



You can find more bargains in our daily deals section.

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,543 other subscribers

5 replies on “Daily Deals (9-19-2018)”

  1. What does “7 times less” mean? $50 is one-sixth of $300, and I would say that “7 times less than 300” is -1800, assuming “x times less than y” means y – xy. I have heard of the interpretation something like y/x, but that doesn’t seem to make mathematical sense here ( y/[x-1]??? ) or linguistic sense in the general case (is one time less just the same? or infinite? I feel like it should be 0.).

    Doing a quick search, it looks like I’m not alone in this assessment. I would recommend avoiding this phrasing.

    1. Yes, part of a modern trend to distort and sensationalise statistics. Sometimes its hard to tell whether it is just ignorant or being intentionally misleading, but whenever I see someone abuse figures in this way I’ll immediately distrust all the facts they quote, not just the distorted one.

      – Its like adding the sentence ‘ Warning, I distort facts and take liberties with the truth ‘ at the end of a paragraph!

    2. I’m surprised that I read right over that. “7 times less” means nothing; the appropriate description is “one-sixth as much”.

  2. Thanks. If it weren’t for you I most likely wouldn’t have checked out the humble bundle until after they ran out of copies of the telltale game

Comments are closed.