E Ink has been ramping up its color offerings over the past few years, but the company’s ePaper display technology isn’t the only game in town. AU Optronics unveiled a new color display recently that has some of the same benefits as ePaper, but which uses different technology that should make it cheaper and easier to manufacture.

The company showcased its 7.9 inch ChLCD display at the Touch Taiwan show last week.

via TechNews.tw

The ChLCD (Cholesteric Liquid Crystal Display) is bistable, which means that like an E Ink display, it doesn’t use any power at all to display a static image. That means the display draws power every time the content on a screen is changed or refreshed, but once an image is already on the display it can remain there indefinitely.

That has the benefit of both reducing overall power consumption and of allowing the last image loaded to be viewed even in the absence of a power source.

Also, like E Ink displays, ChLCD screens are reflective and can be viewed using only ambient lighting, with no need for a backlight (although additional lighting may be necessary to view the screen in dark or dimly lit environments.

But unlike E Ink’s Kaleido displays, for example, there’s no color filter applied here, so you don’t lose screen resolution when viewing color content rather than black and white. And since many of the materials used to manufacture a ChLCD display are similar to what you’d use to make other LCD screens, the cost of mass producing this sort of display could be more affordable.

ChLCD technology has been around for more than a decade, but it hasn’t been widely adopted. But AU Optronics is now bettering that there may be increased demand for the displays thanks to the growing demand for low-power, sunlight visible displays due to the growth of IoT (Internet of Things) devices. In a recent earnings call, AU Optronics officials suggested that the displays could be appropriate for “education, transportation, and traffic” applications, among other things.

Whether we’ll see them in eBook readers or other consumer-oriented devices remains to be seen.

via TechNews, E-Ink-Info, and AU Optronics press release

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign


Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Subscribe to Liliputing via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,536 other subscribers

4 replies on “AU Optronics positions its 7.9 inch ChLCD display as an alternative to color E Ink”

  1. Interesting…

    I’d love to see how this tech compares to reflective LCD in practice.

  2. This was what I didn’t understand but kind of glad to see Transflective making a resurgence. Yeah, you’ll probably never get 100% sRGB quality from them, but for reading thought it would be more than good enough to have at least 16,000 colors + 60fps. I know TCL has a line of NXTPaper products, but hard to see people who’ve properly reviewed them, especially in english or non-bedroom reviewed.

    1. It looks like TCL never actually sold any devices with those unlit displays. They planned a Nxtpaper 10, but that never launched. Their nxtpaper 10s tablet just uses a matte backlit LCD. It’s probably because people looked at the photos here, and saw an obvious downgrade in image fidelity. Even this article’s photo looks better than that, since it can, apparently, display white correctly.

    2. Considering that they launched their NXTPaper with a conventional LCD two years after showing off the NXTPaper, I think itcs safe to assume that it hasn’t gone well for them.

      So while mainstream reviewers could do with branching out more, it’s harsh to criticise them for not reviewing a product that hasn’t been released.

Comments are closed.