Smart Glasses have a somewhat storied history. Google Glass was largely a flop, outside of the enterprise market. Snapchat Spectacles generated a lot of buzz at first, but it’s fallen off in recent years (and they look funny). But Facebook and Ray-Ban are hoping things will be different with their new Ray-Ban Stories smart glasses.

And there’s at least one good reason to think they might be right: These $299 glasses are designed to look and feel almost exactly like a normal set of Ray-Bans, while adding features like cameras for shooting photos or short videos and speakers for listening to audio. That said their success will depend on just how willing people are to slap a pair of Facebook glasses to their… faces.

First the good news. Early reviews suggest the Ray-Ban Stories really do look nearly identical to an ordinary set of Ray-Ban sunglasses, which is a good thing. They’ve been stylish for decades.

They also reportedly feel nearly identical, weighing just about 5 grams more than a set of Ray-Bands Wayfarers, despite all the added electronic components including cameras, speakers, batteries, wires, and antennas.

Video quality from the dual 5MP cameras is said to be pretty decent for recording short clips, with image stabilization to help keep things steady even when you’re walking. That comes in handy if you want to do some hands-free recording while playing with your kids or pets, going for a run or hike, or just about anything else where a phone might get in the way.

And battery life is said to be decent, with about 3 hours of continuous use while listening to music, or up to 6 hours of run time while using the glasses intermittently to take photos or record videos. It takes about an hour to fully charge the glasses, and they come with a charging case which lets you recharge a few times on the go without plugging into a wall jack.

The built-in speakers are said to sound pretty good, but since they’re near your ears instead of covering them like normal headphones, someone standing nearby might be able to hear what you’re listening to. And music or movies won’t sound as immersive when using the Ray-Ban Stories as Bluetooth headphones. But it does allow you to listen to music or podcasts while out in the world without worrying that you won’t notice the sounds of cars honking or anything else that might alert you to danger. And you can also take phone calls without touching your phone.

To record a photo or video, you can either press a button or say “Hey Facebook, take a video.” And you can control media playback thanks to a built-in touchpad on the side of the glasses.

Now for the other stuff: Facebook has a whole website dedicated to explaining how Ray-Ban Stories were designed with privacy in mind. You know, because it’s not like the company has the best track record with actually keeping things private, so Facebook wants you to know they really, really mean it this time.

But a key selling point of the glasses is that you can record images and videos of people and places and then share them to social media (or just save them for yourself, I guess, since the photos sync with a new app called Facebook View and aren’t automatically sent to Facebook or Instagram). And while there’s a little LED light that glows white on the glasses when you’re recording… it’s actually pretty easy to miss because the glasses look so much like a normal pair of Ray-Bans.

The Wall Street Journal’s Joanna Stern demonstrates the problem in a recent video, where she recorded a whole bunch of people, most of whom had no idea that they were being recorded until she told them (they did give permission for those recordings to be used in her video though).

By the sound of it, the new Ray Bans Stories are among the most comfortable and attractive smart glasses to date. And maybe that shouldn’t be a surprise from a partnership between Facebook (makers of the Oculus Quest line of VR headsets) and Ray-Ban’s parent company EssilorLuxottica.

With prices starting at $299, they’re also among the most affordable.

And that could be great news for folks that want a set of wearable cameras that pairs with their smartphones… and don’t mind sharing data with Facebook. It could be less great news for folks who’d like to know when a camera is pointed at them.

via Facebook, The Verge, TechCrunch, and Engadget (1)(2)

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign

or...

Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Join the Conversation

9 Comments

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. “They’ve be stylish for decades.”
    Whether you meant “they’ve been stylish” or “they be stylish” I couldn’t agree more. ๐Ÿ˜Š ๐Ÿ†’ ๐Ÿ˜Ž

  2. I don’t think I’d buy these but they’re not a million miles from something I would buy. I’d prefer to be able to record video for longer or ideally video call using them to solve a tricky physical problem (e.g. car mechanic with someone on video call for assistance). I was chatting with some friends recently while soldering and had a webcam pointed at the table where I was working, it was extremely difficult to stay in shot and focus where a head-mounted camera would’ve been great. You’d need an external battery pack but that’s fine.

    I think I want Google Glass to make a comeback but with some non-data-harvesting company behind it.

    1. Oh and a physical shutter since 99% of the time I wouldn’t want to be recording and wouldn’t want to creep people out. Commutes by bike acting like a dashcam, pieces to camera using a mirror, showing off an object or recording an activity in private, that’s it.

  3. Tin foil hat time, gather round. How long until Facebook can use facial recognition to determine identities linked to image data from existing tagged Facebook photos? They would only require the will to do this.

    Even if you don’t have a Facebook account, but photos of you exist on Facebook, there might be some degree of possibility of determining relationships to existing members.

    With that, they could theoretically locate people using video from glasses. They wouldn’t even need to stream video from the glasses. The SOC on the glasses could generate facial-recog ID strings that could be sent to a server along with location data. It would absolutely shock me if they haven’t already gone this far to make some kind of impressive friend-recognition feature.

    They could very effectively train a machine learning computer by feeding it data from true confirmed location data from people’s Facebook app, to let it cross reference its facial-recog assumptions against their true location. That’s a valuable data set.

    Anti surveillance masks are looking pretty nice.

    1. I understand the necessity to preface the scenario you describe with “tin foil hat time”. It’s a service for the initiated.

      I’m sure a lot of us know this is already happening to a large degree. Funny how the privacy issues we’re struggling to contain (and failing) online have become intertwined with real life at warp speed: connected door cams, AI-powered face ID, wide-area tracking of everyone where a crime has taken place (no warrants), so much more.

      This third iteration of a CreepCam (not including the gazillion other spy cams) is just another attempt to “wear” us down.

    2. everything you say could also apply to existing smartphones though, right? especially ones running the Facebook app?

      1. Mostly, it’s because when someone is recording you with a phone, you can usually see them do so, and it takes more effort to start recording with a phone. People are more likely to record and upload things more often if all they have to do is look at something, reach up, and touch a button.
        Live streaming doesn’t appear to be a function yet, but that could probably be added with software later.