Apple’s Boot Camp software lets you install Windows on a Mac so that you can choose between macOS and Microsoft’s operating system when you turn on the computer.

First introduced in 2006 when the first Mac computers with Intel chips arrived, Boot Camp’s days are numbered now that Apple is preparing to transition from Intel chips to its own ARM-based processors.

While macOS 11 Big Sur will support Boot Camp when the new operating system arrives this fall, the feature will only work on Macs with Intel chips. In the short term, that probably only means a few upcoming Apple laptops and desktops will be excluded. But since Apple has implied that it will eventually transition all of its computers to “Apple Silicon,” odds are that if you buy a new Mac a few years from now, it won’t support Boot Camp.

That said, Apple has promised that its computers will support virtualization technology. So you might not be able to reboot into Windows, but you may be able to run Windows (or Linux) apps within macOS by using a virtual machine or software like Parallels Desktop.

Overall, the decision to drop Boot Camp isn’t a huge surprise. Yes, Windows 10 can run on computers with ARM chips these days, but unless you buy an ARM-based laptop or tablet with Windows 10 pre-installed, there’s no official way to install the operating system yourself (despite many reports of people doing it unofficially).

And from Apple’s standpoint, there’s probably more downside than upside to letting you run Microsoft’s operating system on Apple’s hardware.

When Apple’s computers had the same Intel processors as PCs from rival companies, there wasn’t much downside to letting users install Windows. For years some folks insisted that the best Windows PC was actually a Mac.

But things look different with the move to ARM. As Apple prepares to launch the first Macs with Apple Silicon, the company already has a big lead over the competition. Benchmarks show that the chips used in recent iPhones and iPads outperform anything produced by Qualcomm, Samsung, Huawei, Mediatek, or other companies producing ARM chips for mobile devices. And since Apple makes both the hardware and software for its devices, it can make sure the operating system takes full advantage of the chips (and vice versa).

Odds are that even if you could install Windows on a Mac, it wouldn’t perform nearly as well as macOS. And that would probably tarnish both brands.

Update: The Verge reports that the issue may be entirely due to the way Microsoft licenses Windows 10 on ARM — it’s only available to device manufacturers and not end users. So there’s no way to buy a valid Windows 10 on ARM license and install it. But that’s not to say that it won’t ever happen in the future if Microsoft decides to change its licensing terms and/or works out some sort of arrangement with Apple.

via Gizmodo

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker* and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign

or...

Contribute via PayPal

* If you are using an ad blocker like uBlock Origin and seeing a pop-up message at the bottom of the screen, we have a guide that may help you disable it.

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. I don’t think Microsoft much to gain trying to make Windows run on an ARM mac. Windows is not their real money-maker, it’s services like Microsoft 365, Azure and such. They could end up giving Windows 10 away for free, kinda how Android works, it’s only a means to let people subscribe to their services. And most if not all of their services run on MacOS, and will probably run on MacOS ARM as well. So, there is little sense spending a fortune on R&D and getting involved with Apple trying to run Windows. As for the end user? Well, 99% of your online life already happens in a browser, so it doesn’t really matter what OS is underneath. Apple was never very fond of PC gamers (no nvidia, poor game support, etc), so they won’t loose much of a market share if gamers change to PC (they most likely already did), and for the rest, there is now Apple Arcade: a game subscription, the best model for Apple, they’ll pus it above everything. If you had some specialized industrial software running on a Mac through some compatibility layer, well, you are not an important enough customer for Apple either. And frankly, the 40 year old baggage x86 carries was starting to show it’s downsides so I’m not all that sad hitting the reset button on PCs. I just don’t like the idea of a walled garden desktop Apple will likely offer. However as an ARM desktop becomes a viable option, many will follow, I hope an open source architecture (RISC V) will also emerge as a competitive option.

  2. Either way, there will be tools to virtualize windows using software like Parallels. While it won’t be quite as fast as running it on Intel hardware, it is a workable solution and NO NEED TO PANIC PEOPLE!

    1. Has it been confirmed yet that Parallels will support ARM powered Macs? Virtualization software is heavily dependant on the CPU architecture that is running it, I suspect it will require a commitment from Parallels to build and support an ARM version.