Liliputing

  • Reviews
  • Deals
  • How To…
  • Mini PCs
  • Shop
  • About
    • About Liliputing
    • Contact us
    • Advertise on Liliputing
    • Support Liliputing
    • Privacy Policy

Intel Apollo Lake chips to offer 30 percent performance boost over Braswell

06/04/2016 at 9:09 AM by Brad Linder Leave a Comment

Intel’s Apollo Lake processors are set to hit the streets in the second half of 2016. They’re low-power, low-cost chips aimed at laptops, 2-in-1 tablets, and some desktop computers, and they’re the follow-up to the Intel “Braswell” processors we’ve been seeing over the past year in devices like Chromebooks, cheap Windows laptops, and mini-desktops.

So what’s the difference between Apollo Lake on Braswell? A few months ago Intel told us the new chips would offer better performance and efficiency. Now the company is providing some numbers.

apollo lake

The new chips are based on Intel’s Goldmont CPU architecture, which replaces the Airmont CPU technology used in Braswell (and Intel Atom “Bay Trail”) chips.

AnandTech forum member Paul Jackson posted a slide from an Intel event this week at Computex, showing what we can expect from the move to Goldmont:

  • 30 percent better CPU performance
  • 30 percent better graphics performance (with Intel Gen9 graphics)
  • Support for DDR3L, LPDDR3, and LPDDR4 memory
  • 15 percent longer battery life (all things being equal)
  • Support for USB Type-C

The slide also confirms that Apollo Lake chips will be branded under the Intel Celeron and Pentium N and J series, much like today’s Braswell chips. There’s still no word on an exact launch date, clock speeds for the new chips, or other details that will really help us figure out whether we can expect to see a 30 percent performance improvement in real-world conditions.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Email

Daily Deals (2-22-2019)

Rakuten is running sale on home & outdoor goods today, which means you can save 20% on a bunch of products for up to a total of $40 off. Just use … [Read More...]



Support Liliputing

Liliputing’s primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the “Shop” button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we’ll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you’re using an ad blocker and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign

or…

Contribute via PayPal

  • donate monthly
  • donate once only
Select a Donation Option (USD)

Enter Donation Amount (USD)

Leave a Reply

Login with
Facebook Google Twitter WordPress Yahoo! Disqus Reddit Stackoverflow GitHub
avatar
This comment form collects your name, email address, and content to allow us to keep track of comments placed on this website. Please read our privacy policy for more details.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser cookies for the next time I comment.
avatar
This comment form collects your name, email address, and content to allow us to keep track of comments placed on this website. Please read our privacy policy for more details.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser cookies for the next time I comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
realjjj
Guest
realjjj
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

So far behind ARM.

Vote Up-1Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
Hemedans
Guest
Hemedans
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Atleast they are usefull, if they can clock them around 3.0ghz then we will have core 2 duo perfomance in less than 10w TDP.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Silvermont/Airmont is already equivalent to Core2Duo at near equivalent clocks. So a 30% improvement means they can provide that level of performance at lower clocks… and we’re talking less than 6W TDP…

Vote Up1Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
sadfasdf
Guest
sadfasdf
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

No. Silvermont/airmont, clock for clock has horribly less single thread performance than core 2 duo. A 1.8GHz C2D is nearly 3x the single thread performance of a 1.8GHz silvermont core. A 30% boost does not even reach parity.

Vote Up-1Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Nope, first you’re comparing a architecture that’s optimized for quad core versus a architecture optimized for no more than dual core… Silvermont/Airmont don’t support Hyper Threading, for example… But quad core performance makes up for this and puts them in parity… Second, these are no longer the days that single threaded performance is paramount anymore… Most apps and OS fully support multithreaded processing. Third, let’s not exaggerate the performance of the Core2Duo… The benchmarks today are not the same used to bench those old Core2Duo’s and there are other variables that didn’t exist back then either… You’re far more likely to get a SSD, with far better performance than those available when the Core2Duos were around… These ATOMs fully support QuickSync and a variety of other performance enhancing features that the Core2Duos didn’t have… Etc. So real world experience is better now compared to older hardware of apparently equivalent benchmark… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
Hemedans
Guest
Hemedans
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

3x? No way

I check single thread perfomance of c2d l7500 with 1.6ghz and passmark score was 576 so CyberGusa was right c2d and braswell ipc was same. Apollo will be 30% faster.

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cp…

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
riddick
Guest
riddick
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Looks like 2x to me (z3735g @350 and c2d t7500 @765).
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cp…
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/c…
The z3735g has a peak of 1.83GHz, and t7500 is 2.2GHz.
Take away 15% from the t7500 for being 15% faster and it still is 2x.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
Hemedans
Guest
Hemedans
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

that cpu does not belong to braswell, and that core 2 duo has base clock of 2.2ghz thats not fair because it will always operate at 2.2ghz you need to compare base to base and not base with turbo

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
riddick
Guest
riddick
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

the c2d t7500 was released in Q3 2006. 10 years ago. They didn’t have turbo mode back then. The original 3x statement was about silvermont, not braswell. If the silvermont turbo doesn’t turn on during a benchmark, then I guess it will never turn on. You are absolutely right about it being not 3x, but calling them similar is dead wrong.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
Hemedans
Guest
Hemedans
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

those baytrail soc are 2 to 4watts they cant sustain turbo at long time, they will just burst and return to clock speed,and those cpu, you did choose slowest baytrail (1.3ghz one) versus 2.2ghz c2d which is not fair at all and you cant measure ipc in that way.

atom z3795 – baytrail (4w) 1.6ghz
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cp…

intel core 2 duo t5200 (34w) 1.6ghz

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cp…

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Yup, for some reason some people think comparing worst case with best case is somehow a relevant comparison that establishes how the entire platform compares to each other… Sticking to the unequal comparison, here’s another link that more directly compares the two for a little perspective… http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-… There’s like a 21.5x difference in power efficiency per watt between them… and that link also shows the ATOM is still the better deal despite being a bottom of the range offering and despite the clock speed disadvantage not all the benchmarks are lower for it… Never mind, if anyone actually tried running a C2D in a 8″ Windows tablet or HDMI dongle PC stick it’ll probably throttle a lot, assuming it would even run, let alone fit as it was also a much larger multi-chip with no built in GPU… and let’s not get into how lousy Intel GMA’s were ten years… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
riddick
Guest
riddick
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Nice try. First, there are no z3795 notebooks ever made. Second, the turbo frequency is 2.4GHz. I will admit that I selected the fastest c2d cpu (it has the most cache). I will accept the t5200 as the c2d sample with passmark 531, but that still needs to be compared to z3735g with passmark 350. Not quite double, but more than 50% faster. A 10 year old c2d laptop is much faster than a baytrail netbook in single threaded performance.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
Hemedans
Guest
Hemedans
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Again why you want to compare 1.3ghz with 1.6ghz one? Just choose 1.6ghz baytrail and compare them. If you have it then disable turbo clock and see if score will be 350 or more

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Don’t even need to, the actual average passmark score for the Z3735G is 916… http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cp… I don’t know where they got 350 from but it’s either made up or from a really badly made system that was throttling badly or it’s not even from the model in question… I might believe the 350 score if it was from a Clover Trail but not a Bay Trail or later… Though, a Quark based Intel product like the Curie might be in that range too but that’s a IoT range product… Well, the Z3735G does have a low single core score but this is a SoC optimized for mobile usage. Silvermont is optimized for multi-core performance as that’s more energy efficient. It’s also one of the reasons why they dropped Hyper Threading for Silvermont, as previous ATOMs had it, as it was a trade off for improved energy efficiency as it let… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Nope, the Z3735G has a average Passmark score of 916! http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cp… Versus 836 for the C2D T5200… http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cp… Mind, you’re comparing a quad core to a dual core… and the Silvermont architecture is optimized for multi-core performance because it has to work with less than 4.5W TDP… Even when all the cores are active and running at full clock they’re only drawing about 2W for four cores combined The Z3735G isn’t a laptop SoC either, it’s a mobile SoC for the tablet and similar device markets! It’s specifically a Bay Trail T, which means tablet range SoC… The Bay Trail M and D series are the ones that went into Laptops under Celeron/Pentium branding… The Z3735G is also bottom range, it’s one of the lowest end Bay Trail’s meant for dirt cheap products… While the Z3795 did make it into 2 in 1’s like the Asus Transformer T200TA… but for… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
juanjeremy2012
Guest
juanjeremy2012
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

YOU GUYS MUST BE SNORTING JENKUM IF YOU THINK THAT A BRASWELL IS ANYWHERE CLOSE TO A CORE 2. I REGULARLY USE AN OLD CORE 2 GENERATION PENTIUM LAPTOP AND IT IS WAY FASTER THAN MY HP STREAM, LIKE WAAYYY FASTER

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

First, it’s Core2Duo, not Core 2… There’s no such thing as a Core 2…

Second, you’re comparing to a dirt cheap model that’s way slower than a top of the line ATOM… HP Stream has too little RAM and too slow a eMMC that just cripples whatever performance the SoC could provide as well… There’s a reason they call them Cloudbooks!

Something like the Surface 3 is closer to expected performance, with some high end Braswell/Bay Trail offering a bit more… Especially when coupled with at least 4GB RAM and a real SSD instead of eMMC…

Want to really compare you HP Stream to your old Core2Duo then equip your old system with a OS that boots off a SD card (eMMC=embedded Multi-Media Card and shares more in common with a SD than a SSD), and only 1-2GB of RAM and try running W10 off of it… Good Luck!

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
realjjj
Guest
realjjj
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

They keep the perf way low to protect Core M where they have insane margins . Found the new Atom on Geekbench , here vs the new dual core low end AMD that is higher power but at least offers a lot more in single core perf for cheap https://browser.primatelabs.co…So in single core you got 1.5k in integer, 1.1k in FP. A72 does 2.2k in integer and 1.8k in FP. Qualcomm’s Kryo does about 2.1k in both for the higher clocked cores in SD820 but it is less efficient than A72. A73 on 16ff will bring a bit more perf soon and next year on 10nm some 30% more than A72 on 16ff and that means more than 2x faster than this Atom core in Geekbench. We could see midrange SoCs with 2xA73 at high clocks plus 4xA53 on 14/16ff next year, enabling some really fast midrangers. No wonder Intel… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
Hemedans
Guest
Hemedans
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

I lost confidence on Geekbench when their score show A9x in ipad pro is faster than haswell i5 and core m,

Then anandtech did test using spec2006 and core m completely destroy A9x in both power consumption and perfomance.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
Labmouse
Guest
Labmouse
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

From your link, it looks like Apollo Lake may be just a bit behind Stoney Ridge in IPC. The Stony Ridge part is listed at 1.75ghz and the Apollo Lake part is listed at 1.1ghz. Those ARM chips you mention are all 2.0ghz+ parts. If they couldn’t outperform a 1.1ghz part, there’d be something seriously wrong with ARM. 😉

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Yup, hard to trust leaked benchmarks as well… Benchmarks may not be optimized for the new chips, the product being tested may not be a optimal or equivalent configuration, each architecture may have different advantages and disadvantages, etc.

For example, this link shows the A9-9410 in a less advantage light vs Braswell’s that are more competitively clocked…

http://laptopmedia.com/highlig…

This will probably go back and forth a lot before we get the final real numbers we can actually really judge/compare…

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
Labmouse
Guest
Labmouse
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

I’m with you. I can speculate all I want about Apollo Lake’s performance, but until I can have a sample in my hands to test, speculation is all it is.

Geekbench is perhaps the worst benchmark to compare processors of different architectures due to their having client applications for all the OSs out there, comparing a windows result to an android or ios result is relatively meaningless, due to significant OS operational difference. Perhaps best to compare tests running them all from the same full-fat linux distro.

Also, notice the registered clock speeds for A9-9410 in geekbench. Wikipedia states the processor starts at 2.9ghz and turbos up to 3.5 at 10-25W, which is a fairly broad TDP range.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
TC
Guest
TC
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

ARM means no Windows / x86…

Vote Up1Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
brian
Guest
brian
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

and that’s a bad thing how??

Vote Up-1Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Not necessarily a bad thing but for some it means a lack of flexibility, more limited range of software you can get to run. Lack of legacy support as most ARM devices have rapid end of life and lack long term support… Not all ARM devices have as reliable history of support for Linux as Intel does, etc…

Vote Up1Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
e
Guest
e
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Any word on Apollo Lake NUCs? Last year there were roadmap and spec leaks for a few months prior to release IIRC

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Nothing official yet… Mind, last minute changes may be requiring a change to their planned lineup…

Apollo Lake wasn’t originally suppose to overlap Broxton for Tablets but with Broxton Cancelled that means Apollo Lake now has to cover Tablets too…

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
Grant Russell
Guest
Grant Russell
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

I’m curious to see the first HEVC benchmarks. I hope there is at least one model with HDMI 2.0

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
juanjeremy2012
Guest
juanjeremy2012
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

ALL I KNOW IS BRASWELL IS A STINKER, LIKE DIARHEA THAT DRIPS FROM UR BUT.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
Benoît Etienne
Guest
Benoît Etienne
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

will run linux at least, if you look at the picture on stage.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Yes, by the time this is out it should work with Linux just fine… Intel generally has good Linux support, at least for their latest products.

More a question of what else will be in the system… Like the WiFi chip may be from another company with not good Linux support… So still wait for some reviews in that regard…

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
juanjeremy2012
Guest
juanjeremy2012
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

When they say 30% faster that’s a complete joke they just lowered the speed of Braswell by 30% relative to the 2850 so if you increase the speed of Taswell by 30% you get the 2850 again

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
juanjeremy2012
Guest
juanjeremy2012
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Before you get all excited consider that with Boswell they lowered the clock speed by 30% relative to the 2840 so if the new chip is 30% faster than Braswell you get the 2840 again

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

I think you meant Braswell, but they didn’t really lower clocks… let alone by 30%… The Airmont architecture is essentially the same as the Silvermont architecture, except for the GPU. The primary purpose of the Airmont release was to help close the massive gap in GPU performance with the competition and thus that’s what they focused on… This left the CPU side essentially unchanged, but they had to deal with a much more powerful GPU that would generate more heat and use more power in a SoC that was still intended to be used in mobile devices. So they didn’t lower clocks, they just didn’t raise them and left them at base level for the first releases… But much of the base clocks were still higher than Bay Trail, the burst clocks were just not as high with a initial max of around 2.4GHz instead of the originally expected 2.7GHz….… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
juanjeremy2012
Guest
juanjeremy2012
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Base clock of 2840 is 2.1thx. Base clock of 3050 is 1.6ghx

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

The predecessor to the N3050 is the N2815, not the N2840! The N2815 has a base clock of 1.86 GHz, with a burst max of 2.13 GHz vs the N3050’s 1.6-2.16 GHz range… along with about the same TDP… But the N2840 operates at a higher TDP of 7.5W and a SDP of 4.5W vs the N2815/N3050’s 6W TDP and 4W SDP… So they aren’t equivalent… You’d have to go quad core to see any of the Braswell’s go up to even 6.5W TDP… but a Braswell can still have pretty good burst clocks and unlike the Core’s Turbo Clocks, Burst clocks can be maintained almost indefinitely as long as the SoC doesn’t overheat and throttle. So the lower base clocks are more for power efficiency… The J3710 is a quad core with a base clock of 1.6GHz but it can go up to 2.64 GHz and is one of… Read more »

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
penguinx64
Guest
penguinx64
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

There’s no way I’d buy a cheap Windows laptop with only 32gb of storage.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Minimum storage is probably going to go up along with RAM… We’ll see but there’s a lot less reason for them to stick to 32GB or less unless it’s for a Cloud based product like Chromebooks that they don’t intend for you to put too many local files on…

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
riddick
Guest
riddick
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Educational market and people close to the poverty line. Just like braswell, just like baytrail.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
CyberGusa
Guest
CyberGusa
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

It’s not just for education and people close to the poverty line, but otherwise yes… This is just a update that brings in some overdue improvements to this product range.

So better but doesn’t cross into other product ranges…

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
Labmouse
Guest
Labmouse
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

Would also make for a nice CPU for a software based network appliance, a sub-segment of the IoT market that hasn’t been getting much attention until recently.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago
juanjeremy2012
Guest
juanjeremy2012
You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Website admin will know that you reported it. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous.

They need to come out with some higher-end models with regular core I chips he’s right right now these Adam based chrome books r for ghetto monkeys

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
2 years ago

Follow Liliputing:

Facebook Twitter YouTube tumblr RSS Patreon

Latest News

Huawei will unveil the Mate X foldable smartphone Feb 24th

Two companies have officially revealed smartphones with foldable AMOLED … [Read More...]

Taihe Gemini portable monitor giveaway

The Taihe Gemini is a portable display that's been generating a lot of buzz … [Read More...]

Light and Sony partner on reference designs for multi-camera smartphones

Phones with three rear cameras are becoming common. Samsung's upcoming Galaxy … [Read More...]

Featured articles

GPD MicroPC handheld computer preview

It's been a good couple of years for handheld computer enthusiasts. Companies … [Read More...]

Taihe Gemini portable 1080p touchscreen monitor preview

The Taihe Gemini portable monitor has made quite a splash since going up for … [Read More...]

Zotac Pico PI470 is a pocket-sized PC with Intel Amber Lake

Zotac's latest pocket-sized computer is the company's most powerful to date. … [Read More...]

Disclosure: Some links on this page are monetized by Skimlinks and Amazon's and eBay's affiliate programs.

Login

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2019 Liliputing · About Liliputing · Contact Us · Privacy Policy · Go to top of page

wpDiscuz
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.