Meet the Asus Transformer Mini (specs revealed)

I have a feeling this “mini” will be priced below the $299 T100HA.

Asus is going the wrong direction right now. The biggest complaints everyone had about the original T100 was that it was too weak, and screen resolution was too poor. Since then, the T100 has barely budged on performance, and when it has improved, it has never been an improvement in more than 1 regard (the T100HA had a faster CPU but same 2gb ram, and low screen res).

The only attempt they made was the T100 Chi, but the keyboard was changed to a terrible bluetooth-connected one.

there are t100ha with 4gb ram

You’re right i had that wrong. The screen resolution was the only major letdown. For me it was a deal breaker

Uh, they already went the other way… The mini is their low end model… The Transformer 3 and Transformer 3 Pro are the new standard… They just have a much higher starting price…

The T3 starts at $799 and the T3 Pro starts at $999… The Mini is just a cheapo version of the T3 Pro but getting a Surface like design to T100HA pricing means cutting corners…

While they’re still releasing some other Transformer models that still make use of the keyboard dock design but as Intel won’t be releasing Broxton it’s likely they’re rethinking the budget range… which will won’t know the full ramifications of until probably next year.

Cheap 2 in 1’s may still be around by next year but it’s likely they’re be larger than 10″ after this year…

What I meant was, the 10″ T100 never ventured far enough into the performance scale to be more than just acceptable. The T200 and T300 (and now the Transformer 3 series) are another story, but the T100 remained a lame product for its whole life. My calling it “lame” is, of course, relative. Relative to things like the iPad. Of course the iPad is an unfair comparison, but it wouldn’t be unfair if Asus actually made a good $399-499 T100. The problem is the way Asus does business. They don’t much to build their brand image, they just make “johnny-come-lately” products that look great, undercut the big players by getting in at a lower price point by skimping on a few features, and then they are at the mercy of mediocre reviews. Following that they sell them at their MSRP for a while, and then slash pricing like crazy (or… Read more »

My “lame” T100 is still very useful and productive (way more so than any ipad – and sure an ipad has a higher resolution for playing all those phone games rather than PC games, but the same is true of any Android tablet or phone, nothing special about ipads). Rightly or wrongly, 10″ has always been seen as “budget” in Windows devices, I imagine because they assume people wanting to spend more will want a bigger device, or because if you want a power machine, it’s easier to do with with Intel Core, which is probably easier to put into larger devices. An Atom based machine with a high resolution risks being unbalanced (so you can have an ipad with a high resolution, it’s still an ARM device without the power of Intel Core, not to mention being low spec in other areas like eMMC rather than full SSD).

Absolutely, I have a T100 too. I have the Z3740 model. Still very useful, but only because I know what expectations to have about what it can do. I don’t expect to game on it or anything. When I say “lame”, I mean that it never evolved into offering what customers wanted. Asus made some better Transformers, but always 13″ You hit the nail on the head when you say that larger devices typically got better specs because it was easier to fit Intel Core chips into larger devices. I don’t really need a Core CPU or even a Core M. I just want something better than the absolute lowest Atom CPU. I feel like the new T100HA is pretty much there, with the exception of the screen resolution. But I’m disappointed to see that the new T101 refresh model is not improving the screen. I’d like Asus to rename… Read more »

Do you consider the Surface 3 cheap? The Asus T300CHI with a Core m chip was less expensive than the 4GB with its keyboard.

The Surface 3 is not exactly cheap but you pretty much get what you pay for with it… The T300CHI cuts lots of corners on build quality (it’s not terrible but it’s not high quality either), cheap BT keyboard with terrible touch pad, is heavier (not good for a tablet) for its size as it’s only lighter than the Surface Pro 3 but heavier than the Surface 3, digitizer only recognizes 256 levels of pressure sensitivity vs over 1000 for the Surface, etc… It’s not a terrible product but there’s a reason for the pricing difference… Mind, pricing isn’t based on just the processor but the total cost of the product and all the other parts add up to more of the total price than the processor does… If MS included the keyboard cover, instead of selling it as an extra separate product, then it would be a pretty good… Read more »

I chose the T100 over the Surface 3 because of it’s better working on a lap in laptop mode. Also the lighter weight of the tablet portion was a bonus.

I’d gladly take the specs of a Surface 3 in the T100’s form. Maybe a Surface Book Mini…

Note the T100HA 64GB is £280, so yes I imagine the price will be much less than a Surface 3 (which is a shame really – the original T100 was a best seller even though it was more expensive than the T100HA, so I don’t see why they need to keep cutting the costs).