Taiwanese computer maker Inventec is developing a low cost laptop that could run Windows Mobile 7 when the operating system is released (probably sometime next year). There are a few advantages to Windows Mobile over Linux or a full version of Windows. It’s cheaper to license than Windows and has lower hardware requirements. Windows Mobile devices can also typically turn on and off instantly and provide excellent battery life. But here’s the thing: Windows Mobile is an operating system designed for cellphones and PDAs, not computers. And I think anyone who buys a laptop running Windows Mobile will realize this pretty quickly.

I first got excited about ultraportable computing devices when I picked up my first PDA about 8 or 9 years ago. My first Philips Nino was little more than a glorified calculator with an eBook reader thrown in for good measure. But over the years I upgraded to a Compaq Aero, a Casio Cassiopeia E115, a Dell Axim X5, and a Dell Axim X50v. Every now and again I picked up a “Handheld PC” which the name Microsoft and hardware makers gave to clamshell devices that ran an operating system similar to the Pocket PC or Windows Mobile OS used in PDAs and smartphones.

The NEC MobilePro 790 was pretty awesome in terms of size and weight. It was portable enough to throw into any bag and forget about it, but it was large enough to feature a touch-typable keyboard. The HP Jornada 720, on the other hand was far too tiny to really touch-type on, but it had a significantly quicker processor than the MobilePro. (NEC eventually put out the MobilePro 900, with a relatively zippy 400MHz ARM CPU, but by that point, almost nobody was making software for handheld computers).

These handhelds could create and edit basic Office documents and browse web sites. But considering how much they looked like computers, they were significantly less versatile. I loved the instant on/off function, and the long battery life. But if you didn’t like the portable version of Internet Explorer (and pretty much nobody did), you were out of luck.

A few years after getting rid of my last Handheld PC I picked up an Asus Eee PC, and realized the reason I had never been thrilled with the older machines was becuase of the limitations of their operating systems. What I really wanted was a computer, not a glorified PDA. Even though there are better web browsers (Opera Mobile), word processors (Softmaker Office) and other applications for Windows Mobile than there were a few years ago, you never know if you’re going to be able to update your system to the next version of Windows Mobile when it’s released. And you never know if your favorite software will follow you if you can upgrade. And the software selection is still pathetically small compared to what you can find for Windows, Linux, or OS X computers.

At $299, the Inventec laptop will be significantly cheaper than the HP Jornada or NEC MobilePro were in their day. But when you can pick up a cheap Asus Eee PC for $250, it just doesn’t seem worth the money.

[via Gizmodo]

Support Liliputing

Liliputing's primary sources of revenue are advertising and affiliate links (if you click the "Shop" button at the top of the page and buy something on Amazon, for example, we'll get a small commission).

But there are several ways you can support the site directly even if you're using an ad blocker and hate online shopping.

Contribute to our Patreon campaign

or...

Contribute via PayPal

4 replies on “Future subnotebooks to be powered by Windows Mobile 7?”

  1. I’m not convinced Windows Mobile is cheaper to licence than linux, as your article suggests. Linux is free, and more often than not results in a cheaper overall system — something crucial in the UMPC market.

    1. I meant that it’s cheaper to license than a full version of Windows. Thanks
      for catching this. I’ve updated the post to make it more clear.

  2. your probably might be mainly about sticking with microsoft all the time lol

    if you tried out palmos, or epoc (psion), you might have quite different view

    e.g. when “Philips Nino was little more than a glorified calculator with an eBook reader thrown in for good measure”, palm os already was a proper os with proper software!

Comments are closed.