<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liliputing &#187; rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/tag/rant/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:12:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>This is why we don&#8217;t often write about analyst statements</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/02/this-is-why-we-dont-often-write-about-analyst-statements.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/02/this-is-why-we-dont-often-write-about-analyst-statements.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung galaxy tab]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=31531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/02/this-is-why-we-dont-often-write-about-analyst-statements.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/tab.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="samsung galaxy tab" /></a>I've noticed a trend among tech journalists and bloggers over the past few years where someone will publish estimates from a trade industry analyst as if they were real figures. Want to know how many iPads Apple sold in 2010? Ask an analyst. Need to know what the return rate on the Samsung Galaxy Tab is? Ask an analyst. It... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/02/this-is-why-we-dont-often-write-about-analyst-statements.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/02/this-is-why-we-dont-often-write-about-analyst-statements.html">This is why we don&#8217;t often write about analyst statements</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/02/this-is-why-we-dont-often-write-about-analyst-statements.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 reasons Michael Arrington&#8217;s critique of netbooks is wrong</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/11/6-reasons-michael-arringtons-critique-of-netbooks-is-wrong.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2008/11/6-reasons-michael-arringtons-critique-of-netbooks-is-wrong.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techcrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2008/11/6-reasons-michael-arringtons-critique-of-netbooks-is-wrong.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/tc-rant.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="TechCrunch netbook rant" title="TechCrunch netbook rant" /></a>Michael Arrington, the driving force behind the popular tech blog TechCrunch has a thought provoking article today, entitled "Three Reasons Why Netbooks Just Aren't Good Enough." In a nutshell, he says they're underpowered and that the keyboards and screens are too small. Fair enough, but you'll notice he doesn't say exactly what they're not good enough for in the title.... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2008/11/6-reasons-michael-arringtons-critique-of-netbooks-is-wrong.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2008/11/6-reasons-michael-arringtons-critique-of-netbooks-is-wrong.html">6 reasons Michael Arrington&#8217;s critique of netbooks is wrong</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2008/11/6-reasons-michael-arringtons-critique-of-netbooks-is-wrong.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

