<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liliputing &#187; benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/tag/benchmarks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 may have Exynos quad core processor</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-note-10-1-may-have-exynos-quad-core-processor.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-note-10-1-may-have-exynos-quad-core-processor.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exynos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung galaxy note 10.1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=44920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-note-10-1-may-have-exynos-quad-core-processor.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="86" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/note-10-benchmark-500x310.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 benchmark" title="note 10 benchmark" /></a>When Samsung unveiled the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 tablet in February the company said it would have a 1.4 GHz dual core processor. But that was then. Now it looks like the company may be giving the 10 inch tablet a bit of a spec bump before launch. Nordic Hardware spotted some benchmark results that suggest the tablet will ship... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-note-10-1-may-have-exynos-quad-core-processor.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-note-10-1-may-have-exynos-quad-core-processor.html">Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 may have Exynos quad core processor</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2012/05/samsung-galaxy-note-10-1-may-have-exynos-quad-core-processor.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony&#8217;s next tablet could feature a quad-core chip</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2012/03/sonys-next-tablet-could-feature-a-quad-core-chip.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2012/03/sonys-next-tablet-could-feature-a-quad-core-chip.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nenamark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony v150]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=43139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2012/03/sonys-next-tablet-could-feature-a-quad-core-chip.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="74" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/nm-v150-500x265.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="Sony V150 NenMark result" title="nm v150" /></a>The two Sony tablets available today ship with NVIDIA Tegra 2 dual-core processors. But it looks like Sony's next tablet could have a Tegra 3 quad-core chip. The folks at Japanese site Ameblo spotted some online benchmark test results for an unannounced Sony device called the Sony V150. The tablet appears to have a 1.4 GHz Tegra 3 processor and... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2012/03/sonys-next-tablet-could-feature-a-quad-core-chip.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2012/03/sonys-next-tablet-could-feature-a-quad-core-chip.html">Sony&#8217;s next tablet could feature a quad-core chip</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2012/03/sonys-next-tablet-could-feature-a-quad-core-chip.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are iPad&#8217;s A5x graphics really 4x faster than NVIDIA Tegra 3?</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2012/03/are-ipads-a5x-graphics-really-4x-faster-than-nvidia-tegra-3.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2012/03/are-ipads-a5x-graphics-really-4x-faster-than-nvidia-tegra-3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple a5x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus eee pad transformer prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia tegra 3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=43129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2012/03/are-ipads-a5x-graphics-really-4x-faster-than-nvidia-tegra-3.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="69" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ipad-v-prime-500x248.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="iPad 3 v. Transformer Prime" title="ipad v prime" /></a>When Apple unveiled its the third generation iPad earlier this month, the company made the bold claim that the new tablet's new Apple A5x processor offers 4 times the graphics performance available from NVIDIA's Tegra 3 processor, which is one of the fastest chips available for Android phones and tablets. NVIDIA expressed some skepticism at the claim, but only the... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2012/03/are-ipads-a5x-graphics-really-4x-faster-than-nvidia-tegra-3.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2012/03/are-ipads-a5x-graphics-really-4x-faster-than-nvidia-tegra-3.html">Are iPad&#8217;s A5x graphics really 4x faster than NVIDIA Tegra 3?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2012/03/are-ipads-a5x-graphics-really-4x-faster-than-nvidia-tegra-3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New iPad has twice the RAM, same clock speed</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2012/03/new-ipad-has-twice-the-ram-same-clock-speed.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2012/03/new-ipad-has-twice-the-ram-same-clock-speed.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geekbench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=43033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2012/03/new-ipad-has-twice-the-ram-same-clock-speed.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="96" height="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/geekbench-ipad.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="Geekbench 2012 iPad" title="geekbench ipad" /></a>The latest iPad is expected to go on sale in stores on March 16th, but it looks like some folks in Vietnam have gotten an early look. Tinhte.vn forum member Sonlazio posted an unboxing video and some early benchmarks. While there aren't a lot of surprises, the benchmarks do show that Apple has doubled the amount of RAM used in... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2012/03/new-ipad-has-twice-the-ram-same-clock-speed.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2012/03/new-ipad-has-twice-the-ram-same-clock-speed.html">New iPad has twice the RAM, same clock speed</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2012/03/new-ipad-has-twice-the-ram-same-clock-speed.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fastest ARM chips are comparable to Intel&#8217;s slowest Atom chips</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2012/02/fastest-arm-chips-are-comparable-to-intels-slowest-atom-chips.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2012/02/fastest-arm-chips-are-comparable-to-intels-slowest-atom-chips.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom n270]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ti omap 4460]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x86]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=42464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2012/02/fastest-arm-chips-are-comparable-to-intels-slowest-atom-chips.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/omap4.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="TI OMAP 4" title="omap4" /></a>Over the past few years ARM-based processors have been getting more and more powerful, while chip makers have been working to make x86 chips more power efficient. So it should come as no surprise that we'll soon see smartphones and tablets with Intel chips. But we may also see laptop and desktop computers with ARM processors one day -- or... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2012/02/fastest-arm-chips-are-comparable-to-intels-slowest-atom-chips.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2012/02/fastest-arm-chips-are-comparable-to-intels-slowest-atom-chips.html">Fastest ARM chips are comparable to Intel&#8217;s slowest Atom chips</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2012/02/fastest-arm-chips-are-comparable-to-intels-slowest-atom-chips.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime benchmarks leaked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antutu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus eee pad transformer prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kal-el]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia kal-el]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=39095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="114" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/antutu.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="Transformer Prime benchmarks" title="antutu" /></a>Asus hasn't officially launched the Eee Pad Transformer Prime tablet yet, but it looks like someone might be testing a pre-release unit. If you run the AnTuTu benchmark utility on any current Android device today, you're likely to find that you don't have the fastest machine around. Thats' because the Tranformer Prime now shows up at the top of the list.... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html">Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime benchmarks leaked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Eee Pad Transformer 2 with NVIDIA Kal-El processor benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glbenchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kal-el]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=37830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="67" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/kal-el-bench.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="Kal El benches" title="kal el bench" /></a>NVIDIA is starting to reveal some new details about the Kal-El multi-core processor that will power next-generation phones and tablets. The new chips could launch by the end of the year and show up in actual products soon after. Now it looks like we may have confirmation that one of the first devices to use the upcoming Kal-El processor may... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html">Asus Eee Pad Transformer 2 with NVIDIA Kal-El processor benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP TouchPad with Android (alpha) benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyanogenmod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp touchpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quadrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapdragon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=37707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="99" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/tpquad.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="HP TouchPad Quadrant score" title="tpquad" /></a>As the CyanogenMod team continues to work on porting Google Android to run on the HP TouchPad tablet, a developer has posted some benchmark results. It's worth noting that these benchmarks aren't always reflective of real-world performance and that they were run on a device running software that's still not fully functional. That said, benchmarks at least give a basis... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html">HP TouchPad with Android (alpha) benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Atom Cedar Trail chips benchmarks show modest improvements</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cedar trail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom n2600]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom n2800]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=37025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="93" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/vrz-bench.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="Intel Atom Cedar Trail benchmarks" title="vrz bench" /></a>Intel's Atom processors have never been speed demons. They weren't meant to be. Instead, these are low power chips designed to offer long battery life and modest performance that's good enough for basic computing tasks. They're also designed to be cheap, which is why they've been the popular choice for PC companies building low-cost netbooks. But this emphasis on energy... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html">Intel Atom Cedar Trail chips benchmarks show modest improvements</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How does AMD&#8217;s new E-450 chip stack up?</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd e-450]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=36903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="87" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/blogee-pcmark.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="AMD E-450 benchmarks" title="blogee pcmark" /></a>This week AMD introduced a number of new low power Fusion processors including the AMD E-450 which is a little faster than the E-350 chip that's been shipping since last year. But how does it stack up against other low power processors? The folks at Blogee have published a few benchmark results pitting the 1.65 GHz AMD E-450 dual core... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html">How does AMD&#8217;s new E-450 chip stack up?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Android tablet with Intel Atom chip benchmarked, found wanting</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computex 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oak trail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=34548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="49" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/tweakers-caffeine.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="tweakers caffeine" title="tweakers caffeine" /></a>In a completely unfair test, the folks at Tweakers.net spent a few minutes running benchmarks on an Android tablet prototype with an Intel Atom Oak Trail chip. Intel started showing off early models of these tablets at the Computex trade show in Taiwan this week, but they're nowhere near ready for prime time and the software hasn't really been tweaked... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html">Android tablet with Intel Atom chip benchmarked, found wanting</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creative ZiiO 7 Android tablet benchmarked: It&#8217;s fast, but not ridiculously fast</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative ziio 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zms-08]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=31753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ziio-quadrant.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="ziio quadrant" /></a>The Creative ZiiO 7 is one of the first Android tablets from Creative to feature the company's new ZMS-08 media processor. We know that the chip is designed to 1080p HD video playback, and high quality Bluetooth audio. But how does the ZiiO 7 stack up against other Android devices with speedy chips? Hardware Zone forum member ShermanTank has run... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html">Creative ZiiO 7 Android tablet benchmarked: It&#8217;s fast, but not ridiculously fast</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toshiba NB550D netbook with AMD C-50 chip gets benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd c-50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd radeon hd 6250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiba nb550d]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=31465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/nb550d-benches.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="nb550d benches" /></a>The Toshiba NB550D is one of the first 10 inch netbooks to ship with an AMD C-50 Fusion chip with integrated Radeon HD 6250 graphics. We already know that the chip can handle 1080p HD video playback and DirectX 11 graphics, but how does this 1 GHz dual core chip fare against the Intel Atom chips that currently dominate the... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html">Toshiba NB550D netbook with AMD C-50 chip gets benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Ontario C-30 chip benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd c-30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=31180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/c-30-bench.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="c-30 bench" /></a>The folks at ePrice have posted some of the first benchmarks of AMD's new C-30 low power chip. This is a 1.2GHz single core processor with AMD Radeon HD graphics. Honestly, I don't expect to see many computers ship with the C-30, since AMD is really pushing the C-50 dual core version as more of a direct competitor to Intel's... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html">AMD Ontario C-30 chip benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Eee PC 1015PN 10 inch netbook with NVIDIA graphics benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus eee pc 1015pn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia ion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia ion 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=27211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/eee-pc-1015pn-benched.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="eee pc 1015pn benched" /></a>The Eee PC 1015PN is one of the first 10 inch netbooks to feature next-generation NVIDIA ION graphics. While that means the mini-laptop should have no problem handling 1080p HD video playback and HD Flash video, you should keep in mind that there are now two different types of ION chips: Those designed for desktops and larger notebooks and those... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html">Asus Eee PC 1015PN 10 inch netbook with NVIDIA graphics benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

