<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liliputing &#187; benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/tag/benchmarks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime benchmarks leaked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antutu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus eee pad transformer prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kal-el]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia kal-el]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=39095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="114" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/antutu.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="Transformer Prime benchmarks" title="antutu" /></a>Asus hasn't officially launched the Eee Pad Transformer Prime tablet yet, but it looks like someone might be testing a pre-release unit. If you run the AnTuTu benchmark utility on any current Android device today, you're likely to find that you don't have the fastest machine around. Thats' because the Tranformer Prime now shows up at the top of the list.... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html">Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime benchmarks leaked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/11/asus-eee-pad-transformer-prime-benchmarks-leakedantutu.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Eee Pad Transformer 2 with NVIDIA Kal-El processor benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glbenchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kal-el]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=37830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="67" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/kal-el-bench.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="Kal El benches" title="kal el bench" /></a>NVIDIA is starting to reveal some new details about the Kal-El multi-core processor that will power next-generation phones and tablets. The new chips could launch by the end of the year and show up in actual products soon after. Now it looks like we may have confirmation that one of the first devices to use the upcoming Kal-El processor may... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html">Asus Eee Pad Transformer 2 with NVIDIA Kal-El processor benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/asus-eee-pad-transformer-2-with-nvidia-kal-el-processor-benchmarked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP TouchPad with Android (alpha) benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyanogenmod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp touchpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quadrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapdragon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=37707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="99" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/tpquad.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="HP TouchPad Quadrant score" title="tpquad" /></a>As the CyanogenMod team continues to work on porting Google Android to run on the HP TouchPad tablet, a developer has posted some benchmark results. It's worth noting that these benchmarks aren't always reflective of real-world performance and that they were run on a device running software that's still not fully functional. That said, benchmarks at least give a basis... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html">HP TouchPad with Android (alpha) benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/09/hp-touchpad-with-android-alpha-benchmarked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Atom Cedar Trail chips benchmarks show modest improvements</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cedar trail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom n2600]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom n2800]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=37025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="93" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/vrz-bench.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="Intel Atom Cedar Trail benchmarks" title="vrz bench" /></a>Intel's Atom processors have never been speed demons. They weren't meant to be. Instead, these are low power chips designed to offer long battery life and modest performance that's good enough for basic computing tasks. They're also designed to be cheap, which is why they've been the popular choice for PC companies building low-cost netbooks. But this emphasis on energy... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html">Intel Atom Cedar Trail chips benchmarks show modest improvements</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/intel-atom-cedar-trail-chips-benchmarks-show-modest-improvements.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How does AMD&#8217;s new E-450 chip stack up?</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd e-450]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=36903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="87" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/blogee-pcmark.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="AMD E-450 benchmarks" title="blogee pcmark" /></a>This week AMD introduced a number of new low power Fusion processors including the AMD E-450 which is a little faster than the E-350 chip that's been shipping since last year. But how does it stack up against other low power processors? The folks at Blogee have published a few benchmark results pitting the 1.65 GHz AMD E-450 dual core... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html">How does AMD&#8217;s new E-450 chip stack up?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/08/how-does-amds-new-e-450-chip-stack-up.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Android tablet with Intel Atom chip benchmarked, found wanting</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computex 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oak trail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=34548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" height="49" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/tweakers-caffeine.jpg" class="alignright tfe wp-post-image" alt="tweakers caffeine" title="tweakers caffeine" /></a>In a completely unfair test, the folks at Tweakers.net spent a few minutes running benchmarks on an Android tablet prototype with an Intel Atom Oak Trail chip. Intel started showing off early models of these tablets at the Computex trade show in Taiwan this week, but they're nowhere near ready for prime time and the software hasn't really been tweaked... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html">Android tablet with Intel Atom chip benchmarked, found wanting</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/06/android-tablet-with-intel-atom-chip-benchmarked-found-wanting.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creative ZiiO 7 Android tablet benchmarked: It&#8217;s fast, but not ridiculously fast</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative ziio 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zms-08]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=31753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ziio-quadrant.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="ziio quadrant" /></a>The Creative ZiiO 7 is one of the first Android tablets from Creative to feature the company's new ZMS-08 media processor. We know that the chip is designed to 1080p HD video playback, and high quality Bluetooth audio. But how does the ZiiO 7 stack up against other Android devices with speedy chips? Hardware Zone forum member ShermanTank has run... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html">Creative ZiiO 7 Android tablet benchmarked: It&#8217;s fast, but not ridiculously fast</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/02/creative-ziio-7-android-tablet-benchmarked-its-fast-but-not-ridiculously-fast.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toshiba NB550D netbook with AMD C-50 chip gets benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd c-50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd radeon hd 6250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiba nb550d]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=31465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/nb550d-benches.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="nb550d benches" /></a>The Toshiba NB550D is one of the first 10 inch netbooks to ship with an AMD C-50 Fusion chip with integrated Radeon HD 6250 graphics. We already know that the chip can handle 1080p HD video playback and DirectX 11 graphics, but how does this 1 GHz dual core chip fare against the Intel Atom chips that currently dominate the... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html">Toshiba NB550D netbook with AMD C-50 chip gets benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/toshiba-nb550d-netbook-with-amd-c-50-chip-gets-benchmarked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Ontario C-30 chip benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd c-30]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=31180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/c-30-bench.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="c-30 bench" /></a>The folks at ePrice have posted some of the first benchmarks of AMD's new C-30 low power chip. This is a 1.2GHz single core processor with AMD Radeon HD graphics. Honestly, I don't expect to see many computers ship with the C-30, since AMD is really pushing the C-50 dual core version as more of a direct competitor to Intel's... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html">AMD Ontario C-30 chip benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2011/01/amd-ontario-c-30-chip-benchmarked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asus Eee PC 1015PN 10 inch netbook with NVIDIA graphics benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus eee pc 1015pn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia ion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia ion 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=27211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/eee-pc-1015pn-benched.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="eee pc 1015pn benched" /></a>The Eee PC 1015PN is one of the first 10 inch netbooks to feature next-generation NVIDIA ION graphics. While that means the mini-laptop should have no problem handling 1080p HD video playback and HD Flash video, you should keep in mind that there are now two different types of ION chips: Those designed for desktops and larger notebooks and those... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html">Asus Eee PC 1015PN 10 inch netbook with NVIDIA graphics benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2010/10/asus-eee-pc-1015pn-10-inch-netbook-with-nvidia-graphics-benchmarked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Galaxy Tab news roundup</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2010/09/samsung-galaxy-tab-news-roundup.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2010/09/samsung-galaxy-tab-news-roundup.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ifa 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung galaxy tab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=25628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/09/samsung-galaxy-tab-news-roundup.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/tab-games.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="tab games" /></a>Samsung officially unveiled the Galaxy Tab 7 inch Android tablet this morning at the IFA trade show in Germany. And ever since, news has been streaming out of Berlin like a gusher. Here are some of the latest updates: Benchmarking the Galaxy Tab Chippy at CarryPad took a few moments to run a couple of benchmarks on the tablet. Overall,... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2010/09/samsung-galaxy-tab-news-roundup.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/09/samsung-galaxy-tab-news-roundup.html">Samsung Galaxy Tab news roundup</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2010/09/samsung-galaxy-tab-news-roundup.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA Tegra 2-based Toshiba AC100 gets benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2010/08/nvidia-tegra-2-based-toshiba-ac100-gets-benchmarked.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2010/08/nvidia-tegra-2-based-toshiba-ac100-gets-benchmarked.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia tegra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia tegra 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toshiba ac100]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liliputing.com/?p=25371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/08/nvidia-tegra-2-based-toshiba-ac100-gets-benchmarked.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ac100-quadrant.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="toshiba ac100 quadrant benchmark" /></a>The Toshiba AC100 is one of the first Google Android powered notebook-style devices to ship. It's also one of the first products on the market with an NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset. Sure, it might not actually be available in the US yet, but it's shipping in Japan, and it should be coming to Europe soon as well. Chippy from Carrypad... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2010/08/nvidia-tegra-2-based-toshiba-ac100-gets-benchmarked.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/08/nvidia-tegra-2-based-toshiba-ac100-gets-benchmarked.html">NVIDIA Tegra 2-based Toshiba AC100 gets benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2010/08/nvidia-tegra-2-based-toshiba-ac100-gets-benchmarked.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much difference does DDR3 RAM make in netbooks?</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2010/07/how-much-difference-does-ddr3-ram-make-in-netbooks.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2010/07/how-much-difference-does-ddr3-ram-make-in-netbooks.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddr3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom n455]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom n475]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=23896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/07/how-much-difference-does-ddr3-ram-make-in-netbooks.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ddr3.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="ddr3" /></a>Not much. Netbook makers are starting to ship netbooks with new Intel Atom N455 and N475 processors that support DDR3 memory. They have the same clock speed and other features as earlier Intel Atom processors. The only difference is that they use DDR3 RAM instead of DDR2. But what does that mean in terms of actual performance? Sascha from Netbook... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2010/07/how-much-difference-does-ddr3-ram-make-in-netbooks.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/07/how-much-difference-does-ddr3-ram-make-in-netbooks.html">How much difference does DDR3 RAM make in netbooks?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2010/07/how-much-difference-does-ddr3-ram-make-in-netbooks.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated Alienware M11x pitted against first generation: It&#8217;s faster</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2010/06/updated-alienware-m11x-pitted-against-first-generation-its-faster.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2010/06/updated-alienware-m11x-pitted-against-first-generation-its-faster.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alienware m11x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=23185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/06/updated-alienware-m11x-pitted-against-first-generation-its-faster.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/m11x.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="Alienware M11x" /></a>Dell recently launched an update to its Alienware M11x gaming ultraportable laptop. The new model has the same high performance NVIDIA graphics as the first generation 11.6 inch, 4.5 pound gaming rig. But the new models feature Core i-series processors while the original came with a choice of an Intel Pentium SU4100 or Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 processor. The... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2010/06/updated-alienware-m11x-pitted-against-first-generation-its-faster.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/06/updated-alienware-m11x-pitted-against-first-generation-its-faster.html">Updated Alienware M11x pitted against first generation: It&#8217;s faster</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2010/06/updated-alienware-m11x-pitted-against-first-generation-its-faster.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dual Core Intel Atom N550 benchmarked: It&#8217;s fast (for a netbook CPU)</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2010/06/dual-core-intel-atom-n550-benchmarked-its-fast-for-a-netbook-cpu.html</link>
		<comments>http://liliputing.com/2010/06/dual-core-intel-atom-n550-benchmarked-its-fast-for-a-netbook-cpu.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel atom n550]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=23161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/06/dual-core-intel-atom-n550-benchmarked-its-fast-for-a-netbook-cpu.html"><img align="right" hspace="5" width="140" src="http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/7zip-bench.jpg" class="alignright wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="7zip bench" /></a>[/caption] The Intel Atom N550 processor is the first dual core Atom chip built specifically for netbooks. Up until now all dual core Atom processors have been designed for low power desktops. While there aren't any netbooks shipping with the N550 chip recently, the folks at Notebook Italia got a chance to spend a few minutes with a pre-release Asus... <a class="more-link" href="http://liliputing.com/2010/06/dual-core-intel-atom-n550-benchmarked-its-fast-for-a-netbook-cpu.html"><p> Read more &#187;</a>
</p><p><a href="http://liliputing.com/2010/06/dual-core-intel-atom-n550-benchmarked-its-fast-for-a-netbook-cpu.html">Dual Core Intel Atom N550 benchmarked: It&#8217;s fast (for a netbook CPU)</a> is a post from: <a href="http://liliputing.com">Liliputing</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://liliputing.com/2010/06/dual-core-intel-atom-n550-benchmarked-its-fast-for-a-netbook-cpu.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

