A very interesting point raised in this video is that the Pixel Qi screen itself is very thin. Most of the screen thickness in a traditional application will come from the backlight. That raises the possibility of some very interesting applications like very thing tablets which are only illuminated with ambient lighting (like actual paper).

I've been following the work of Mary Lou for quite a while, and it's nice to see great research make its way into products that in turn make their way into the market (although this we're still waiting for that last part). However, the Internet is filled with gadget-lusters who are holding this display up as THE “killer” feature that must be present on their ideal device. I too am expecting it to be great. However, the fact is that none of us have plunked down our hard earned cash on a device with a Pixel Qi display, and none of us have had the chance to live with all the good and/or bad that it has to offer. Before we all lose our minds over our own fantasies about what we think the display will be, it's important to remember that there's a huge difference between great technologies, great products, and great companies. It's very hard to create a prototype of an innovative new display, and it's much, much harder to be a long term player in a technology sector. There are so many potential points of failure for such a company (customer products and service quality, supplier relationships, accounting, management, sustained innovation, partnerships, etc.). It's worth keeping all that in mind.

I'm impatient too. And, I'm still waiting for that flood of ARM-based netbooks that was supposed to be coming. What's the hold-up? I've got money in hand, ready to buy one.

Thanks for Nice bog.I like the detailed information on natural energy.
sharing this information.I’ll share it with others.