<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ready or not, 2010 could be the year of the smartbooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Smartbooks &#124; Teleactivities</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-50172</link>
		<dc:creator>Smartbooks &#124; Teleactivities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-50172</guid>
		<description>[...] ^  Ready or not, 2010 could be the year of the smartbooks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ^  Ready or not, 2010 could be the year of the smartbooks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teddydix</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-48131</link>
		<dc:creator>teddydix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 03:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-48131</guid>
		<description>NEEDS TO RUN WINDOWS? How about SHOULD RUN LINUX!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEEDS TO RUN WINDOWS? How about SHOULD RUN LINUX!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teddydix</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37456</link>
		<dc:creator>teddydix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37456</guid>
		<description>NEEDS TO RUN WINDOWS? How about SHOULD RUN LINUX!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEEDS TO RUN WINDOWS? How about SHOULD RUN LINUX!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hobbittr</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37411</link>
		<dc:creator>Hobbittr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37411</guid>
		<description>Everybody gets so wrapped up in &quot;windoze&quot; which is nothing but a cheap and buggy version of Linux which runs every kind of program necessary for the &quot;road warrior&quot; or those who just have to be &quot;always connected.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody gets so wrapped up in &#8220;windoze&#8221; which is nothing but a cheap and buggy version of Linux which runs every kind of program necessary for the &#8220;road warrior&#8221; or those who just have to be &#8220;always connected.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Murczak</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37390</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Murczak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37390</guid>
		<description>They failed as soon as Windows was strong-armed into the emerging netbook market, and obviously didn&#039;t run well compared to preinstalled and self-installed Linux. People came to think of netbooks as small laptops at that point, when they were in fact designed as compact internet centric devices with limited ability to run desktop software.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Smartbooks will not have this weakness of being x86 based. There will be no way one software vendor hijacks the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They failed as soon as Windows was strong-armed into the emerging netbook market, and obviously didn&#39;t run well compared to preinstalled and self-installed Linux. People came to think of netbooks as small laptops at that point, when they were in fact designed as compact internet centric devices with limited ability to run desktop software.</p>
<p>Smartbooks will not have this weakness of being x86 based. There will be no way one software vendor hijacks the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoloMKXXVIII</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37360</link>
		<dc:creator>BoloMKXXVIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37360</guid>
		<description>Those units are pretty weak devices with little memory or storage. The new &quot;smartbooks&quot; cost more but offer much better specs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those units are pretty weak devices with little memory or storage. The new &#8220;smartbooks&#8221; cost more but offer much better specs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bear Naff</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37359</link>
		<dc:creator>Bear Naff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37359</guid>
		<description>Hey guys?  The ARM notebooks are already here, in droves.  Go to E-bay and search for &quot;7 inch notebook&quot;, you will find hundreds of sub-$100 ARM notebooks (currently running Windows CE) available 7 days a week.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I honestly assumed everyone knew this stuff,  the ARM smartbook hardware is _done_ for the most part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys?  The ARM notebooks are already here, in droves.  Go to E-bay and search for &#8220;7 inch notebook&#8221;, you will find hundreds of sub-$100 ARM notebooks (currently running Windows CE) available 7 days a week.  </p>
<p>I honestly assumed everyone knew this stuff,  the ARM smartbook hardware is _done_ for the most part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ninetynine</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37341</link>
		<dc:creator>ninetynine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37341</guid>
		<description>I am ignoring it? The consensus seemed to be &lt;10&quot; screens are designed for failure, so the early Eee PCs failed for this reason.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although from the failures of those early netbooks, there needs to be more internal storage in smartbooks (comparable to netbooks) in order for them to be competitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am ignoring it? The consensus seemed to be &lt;10&#8243; screens are designed for failure, so the early Eee PCs failed for this reason.</p>
<p>Although from the failures of those early netbooks, there needs to be more internal storage in smartbooks (comparable to netbooks) in order for them to be competitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ninetynine</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37343</link>
		<dc:creator>ninetynine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37343</guid>
		<description>That is misidentified, that smartbook is a prototype made by Quanta. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOmH2eCJQKs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOmH2eCJQKs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is misidentified, that smartbook is a prototype made by Quanta. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOmH2eCJQKs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOmH2eCJQKs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zima</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37340</link>
		<dc:creator>zima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37340</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re ignoring that early Eee PCs tried to do that and FAILED. Smartbooks do have the real, this time, potential to be small (not too small though...), cheap and with insanely long battery time (c&#039;mon, logic components use an order of magnitude less energy that even new Atom Pinetrail)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s another usage model, one that doesn&#039;t involve a smartphone - netbook or smartbook + &quot;feature phone&quot; (which can also be used as &quot;modem&quot; for the machine with keyboard)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re ignoring that early Eee PCs tried to do that and FAILED. Smartbooks do have the real, this time, potential to be small (not too small though&#8230;), cheap and with insanely long battery time (c&#39;mon, logic components use an order of magnitude less energy that even new Atom Pinetrail)</p>
<p>There&#39;s another usage model, one that doesn&#39;t involve a smartphone &#8211; netbook or smartbook + &#8220;feature phone&#8221; (which can also be used as &#8220;modem&#8221; for the machine with keyboard)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zima</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37342</link>
		<dc:creator>zima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37342</guid>
		<description>For some time there are much better pictures of, supposedly, Lenovo smartbook. Seems to be a bit different too, perhaps closer to final model...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinkpads.com/2009/11/25/lenovo-smartbook-better-pictures-will-run-google-android/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thinkpads.com/2009/11/25/lenovo-smar...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some time there are much better pictures of, supposedly, Lenovo smartbook. Seems to be a bit different too, perhaps closer to final model&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thinkpads.com/2009/11/25/lenovo-smartbook-better-pictures-will-run-google-android/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.thinkpads.com/2009/11/25/lenovo-smar" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinkpads.com/2009/11/25/lenovo-smar</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 29/12/2009: Google Nexus One and Netbook Details Leak &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37322</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 29/12/2009: Google Nexus One and Netbook Details Leak &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37322</guid>
		<description>[...] Ready or not, 2010 could be the year of the smartbooks For the past 12 months or so, we’ve heard a lot of talk about mini-laptops running ARM-based processors. These so-called “smartbooks” feature low power ARM processors which means that while they can’t run Windows XP or 7, they can run Linux, last for a very long time on a charge, and some feature integrated 3G connectivity and HD video acceleration features. You also get the ability to receive emails, instant messages, and other data even while the computer is in sleep mode. In other words, they’re like a cross between a smartphone and a netbook, which explains the whole “smartbook” name. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ready or not, 2010 could be the year of the smartbooks For the past 12 months or so, we’ve heard a lot of talk about mini-laptops running ARM-based processors. These so-called “smartbooks” feature low power ARM processors which means that while they can’t run Windows XP or 7, they can run Linux, last for a very long time on a charge, and some feature integrated 3G connectivity and HD video acceleration features. You also get the ability to receive emails, instant messages, and other data even while the computer is in sleep mode. In other words, they’re like a cross between a smartphone and a netbook, which explains the whole “smartbook” name. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Dude</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37325</guid>
		<description>The 3G option isn&#039;t really that appealing for me. I can just tether my existing phone via Bluetooth when wireless isn&#039;t available. I want the &quot;always on&quot; that my phone has and RDP/VNC capability in a form factor that wouldn&#039;t be a hassle to carry around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 3G option isn&#39;t really that appealing for me. I can just tether my existing phone via Bluetooth when wireless isn&#39;t available. I want the &#8220;always on&#8221; that my phone has and RDP/VNC capability in a form factor that wouldn&#39;t be a hassle to carry around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigGoofyGuy</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37315</link>
		<dc:creator>BigGoofyGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37315</guid>
		<description>Smartbooks with &#039;pay as you go&#039; internet connection? If they have cell phones with &#039;pay as you go&#039; minutes; where one buys minutes instead of a contract, I think it would sell very well. Perhaps be &#039;rentals&#039; for vacation places and other places of interest where one might not want to bring a laptop or notebook computer. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that having $10 or $20 added to ones phone bill would be way more appealling than the $60 that is currently being charged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smartbooks with &#39;pay as you go&#39; internet connection? If they have cell phones with &#39;pay as you go&#39; minutes; where one buys minutes instead of a contract, I think it would sell very well. Perhaps be &#39;rentals&#39; for vacation places and other places of interest where one might not want to bring a laptop or notebook computer. </p>
<p>I agree that having $10 or $20 added to ones phone bill would be way more appealling than the $60 that is currently being charged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smartbook : plus de 20 Netbook avec processeur ARM lancé au 1er trimestre 2010 LaptopSpirit.fr - PC Portable, Ultraportables, Netbooks, UMPC et mobilité</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/ready-or-not-2010-could-be-the-year-of-the-smartbooks.html#comment-37308</link>
		<dc:creator>Smartbook : plus de 20 Netbook avec processeur ARM lancé au 1er trimestre 2010 LaptopSpirit.fr - PC Portable, Ultraportables, Netbooks, UMPC et mobilité</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16711#comment-37308</guid>
		<description>[...] [Source : ET News via Liliputing] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Source : ET News via Liliputing] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

