<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel to double Atom graphics power in 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-to-double-atom-graphics-power-in-2011.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-to-double-atom-graphics-power-in-2011.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel to double Atom graphics power in 2011 &#8211; Liliputing &#124; The Bargain Netbook</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-to-double-atom-graphics-power-in-2011.html#comment-41437</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel to double Atom graphics power in 2011 &#8211; Liliputing &#124; The Bargain Netbook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16007#comment-41437</guid>
		<description>[...] Post By Google News Click Here For The Entire Article  Netbook Deals-   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post By Google News Click Here For The Entire Article  Netbook Deals-   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyKing1969</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-to-double-atom-graphics-power-in-2011.html#comment-47318</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyKing1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16007#comment-47318</guid>
		<description>Well, a netbook should be able to do &quot;on the net functions&quot; and sadly from what people say Pine Trail still won&#039;t run Adobe Flash 10.  However, that could be old information and maybe Pine Trail will do a reasonable job with Flash.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefore, its is good to hear Cedar Trail will up the ante, but will it handle Adobe Flash 11 coming down the pike?  That&#039;s Inels real issue, are they a generation of chips behind what people need.  Atom hit a real sweet spot early on, Pine Trail seems to be coming late, and Ceder Trail actully needs to be out now rather then later.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ION exists because Intel has this gap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, a netbook should be able to do &#8220;on the net functions&#8221; and sadly from what people say Pine Trail still won&#39;t run Adobe Flash 10.  However, that could be old information and maybe Pine Trail will do a reasonable job with Flash.</p>
<p>Therefore, its is good to hear Cedar Trail will up the ante, but will it handle Adobe Flash 11 coming down the pike?  That&#39;s Inels real issue, are they a generation of chips behind what people need.  Atom hit a real sweet spot early on, Pine Trail seems to be coming late, and Ceder Trail actully needs to be out now rather then later.  </p>
<p>ION exists because Intel has this gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyKing1969</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-to-double-atom-graphics-power-in-2011.html#comment-35651</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyKing1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16007#comment-35651</guid>
		<description>Well, a netbook should be able to do &quot;on the net functions&quot; and sadly from what people say Pine Trail still won&#039;t run Adobe Flash 10.  However, that could be old information and maybe Pine Trail will do a reasonable job with Flash.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefore, its is good to hear Cedar Trail will up the ante, but will it handle Adobe Flash 11 coming down the pike?  That&#039;s Inels real issue, are they a generation of chips behind what people need.  Atom hit a real sweet spot early on, Pine Trail seems to be coming late, and Ceder Trail actully needs to be out now rather then later.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ION exists because Intel has this gap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, a netbook should be able to do &#8220;on the net functions&#8221; and sadly from what people say Pine Trail still won&#39;t run Adobe Flash 10.  However, that could be old information and maybe Pine Trail will do a reasonable job with Flash.</p>
<p>Therefore, its is good to hear Cedar Trail will up the ante, but will it handle Adobe Flash 11 coming down the pike?  That&#39;s Inels real issue, are they a generation of chips behind what people need.  Atom hit a real sweet spot early on, Pine Trail seems to be coming late, and Ceder Trail actully needs to be out now rather then later.  </p>
<p>ION exists because Intel has this gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruel24</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-to-double-atom-graphics-power-in-2011.html#comment-35587</link>
		<dc:creator>ruel24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16007#comment-35587</guid>
		<description>Pine Trail smells like an anti-trust case for nVidia...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pine Trail smells like an anti-trust case for nVidia&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

