<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Atom D410 and D510 desktop processors benchmarked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-atom-d410-and-d510-desktop-processors-benchmarked.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-atom-d410-and-d510-desktop-processors-benchmarked.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Тесты, тесты и обзор Eee PC 1201N &#124; спецификации &#124; Eee-PC.ru</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-atom-d410-and-d510-desktop-processors-benchmarked.html#comment-35741</link>
		<dc:creator>Тесты, тесты и обзор Eee PC 1201N &#124; спецификации &#124; Eee-PC.ru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16062#comment-35741</guid>
		<description>[...] а вот кто-то из Германии задался и теперь у нас есть результаты этого дела. Сами процессоры ориентированы под неттопы и [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] а вот кто-то из Германии задался и теперь у нас есть результаты этого дела. Сами процессоры ориентированы под неттопы и [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuy</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-atom-d410-and-d510-desktop-processors-benchmarked.html#comment-45811</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16062#comment-45811</guid>
		<description>Except the price points are still too high, and at the end of the day the requirements for graphics are continuously going up, not down, and Intel seems to REFUSE to either partner with someone who could make netops viable (nVidia), lisence a good graphics controller, or release reference designs which allow for upgrade cards...  Which will continue to make them niche, almost useless products...  Which is REALLY SAD because I like the concept a lot.  But me liking it won&#039;t make the facts change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except the price points are still too high, and at the end of the day the requirements for graphics are continuously going up, not down, and Intel seems to REFUSE to either partner with someone who could make netops viable (nVidia), lisence a good graphics controller, or release reference designs which allow for upgrade cards&#8230;  Which will continue to make them niche, almost useless products&#8230;  Which is REALLY SAD because I like the concept a lot.  But me liking it won&#39;t make the facts change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HP</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-atom-d410-and-d510-desktop-processors-benchmarked.html#comment-45810</link>
		<dc:creator>HP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16062#comment-45810</guid>
		<description>The big improvement over the prev-gen Atom 330 mITX board is that this is fanless, which is much preferred for mobile computers. For multimedia (video) nettops, it&#039;s a non-factor. You still need an add-on gfx solution like the Ion, plus HDMI out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One can obviously see the niche for netbooks. Nettops w/o good gfx capability is a much smaller niche, since its mainstream use would be for rendering video onto HDTVs. That&#039;s why the prev-gen Intel nettops never took off, despite attractive price points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big improvement over the prev-gen Atom 330 mITX board is that this is fanless, which is much preferred for mobile computers. For multimedia (video) nettops, it&#39;s a non-factor. You still need an add-on gfx solution like the Ion, plus HDMI out.</p>
<p>One can obviously see the niche for netbooks. Nettops w/o good gfx capability is a much smaller niche, since its mainstream use would be for rendering video onto HDTVs. That&#39;s why the prev-gen Intel nettops never took off, despite attractive price points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuy</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-atom-d410-and-d510-desktop-processors-benchmarked.html#comment-35673</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16062#comment-35673</guid>
		<description>Except the price points are still too high, and at the end of the day the requirements for graphics are continuously going up, not down, and Intel seems to REFUSE to either partner with someone who could make netops viable (nVidia), lisence a good graphics controller, or release reference designs which allow for upgrade cards...  Which will continue to make them niche, almost useless products...  Which is REALLY SAD because I like the concept a lot.  But me liking it won&#039;t make the facts change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except the price points are still too high, and at the end of the day the requirements for graphics are continuously going up, not down, and Intel seems to REFUSE to either partner with someone who could make netops viable (nVidia), lisence a good graphics controller, or release reference designs which allow for upgrade cards&#8230;  Which will continue to make them niche, almost useless products&#8230;  Which is REALLY SAD because I like the concept a lot.  But me liking it won&#39;t make the facts change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HP</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/intel-atom-d410-and-d510-desktop-processors-benchmarked.html#comment-35672</link>
		<dc:creator>HP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16062#comment-35672</guid>
		<description>The big improvement over the prev-gen Atom 330 mITX board is that this is fanless, which is much preferred for mobile computers. For multimedia (video) nettops, it&#039;s a non-factor. You still need an add-on gfx solution like the Ion, plus HDMI out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One can obviously see the niche for netbooks. Nettops w/o good gfx capability is a much smaller niche, since its mainstream use would be for rendering video onto HDTVs. That&#039;s why the prev-gen Intel nettops never took off, despite attractive price points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big improvement over the prev-gen Atom 330 mITX board is that this is fanless, which is much preferred for mobile computers. For multimedia (video) nettops, it&#39;s a non-factor. You still need an add-on gfx solution like the Ion, plus HDMI out.</p>
<p>One can obviously see the niche for netbooks. Nettops w/o good gfx capability is a much smaller niche, since its mainstream use would be for rendering video onto HDTVs. That&#39;s why the prev-gen Intel nettops never took off, despite attractive price points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

