<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP Mini 210 makes another mysterious appearance at HP.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/12/hp-mini-210-makes-another-mysterious-appearance-at-hp-com.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/hp-mini-210-makes-another-mysterious-appearance-at-hp-com.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikez</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/hp-mini-210-makes-another-mysterious-appearance-at-hp-com.html#comment-46004</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16037#comment-46004</guid>
		<description>Most modern processor cores have the ability to power-down the portions of core&lt;br&gt;not in use at any one instanct.&lt;br&gt;Harder to do in CISC than in RISC but it can be done in either.&lt;br&gt;Just because it is all in one package does not mean it has only one &quot;on/off&quot; switch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And then there is MIPS which are a &quot;License it Your Way&quot; set of cores...&lt;br&gt;If you don&#039;t need a feature, you just don&#039;t include it in the core-build when&lt;br&gt;you synstize the core.&lt;br&gt;And yes, MIPS can power-down sections of the core that are there but not&lt;br&gt;in use at any one instant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most modern processor cores have the ability to power-down the portions of core<br />not in use at any one instanct.<br />Harder to do in CISC than in RISC but it can be done in either.<br />Just because it is all in one package does not mean it has only one &#8220;on/off&#8221; switch.</p>
<p>And then there is MIPS which are a &#8220;License it Your Way&#8221; set of cores&#8230;<br />If you don&#39;t need a feature, you just don&#39;t include it in the core-build when<br />you synstize the core.<br />And yes, MIPS can power-down sections of the core that are there but not<br />in use at any one instant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Support for unannounced HP Mini 210 &#124; Eee PC - Blog</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/hp-mini-210-makes-another-mysterious-appearance-at-hp-com.html#comment-35728</link>
		<dc:creator>Support for unannounced HP Mini 210 &#124; Eee PC - Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16037#comment-35728</guid>
		<description>[...] no specifications given, so it may not even be a netbook, but it seems the most likely option. Liliputing suggest it could introduce a significant difference to their current netbook, the HP Mini 110. When [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no specifications given, so it may not even be a netbook, but it seems the most likely option. Liliputing suggest it could introduce a significant difference to their current netbook, the HP Mini 110. When [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikez</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/hp-mini-210-makes-another-mysterious-appearance-at-hp-com.html#comment-35731</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16037#comment-35731</guid>
		<description>Most modern processor cores have the ability to power-down the portions of core&lt;br&gt;not in use at any one instanct.&lt;br&gt;Harder to do in CISC than in RISC but it can be done in either.&lt;br&gt;Just because it is all in one package does not mean it has only one &quot;on/off&quot; switch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And then there is MIPS which are a &quot;License it Your Way&quot; set of cores...&lt;br&gt;If you don&#039;t need a feature, you just don&#039;t include it in the core-build when&lt;br&gt;you synstize the core.&lt;br&gt;And yes, MIPS can power-down sections of the core that are there but not&lt;br&gt;in use at any one instant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most modern processor cores have the ability to power-down the portions of core<br />not in use at any one instanct.<br />Harder to do in CISC than in RISC but it can be done in either.<br />Just because it is all in one package does not mean it has only one &#8220;on/off&#8221; switch.</p>
<p>And then there is MIPS which are a &#8220;License it Your Way&#8221; set of cores&#8230;<br />If you don&#39;t need a feature, you just don&#39;t include it in the core-build when<br />you synstize the core.<br />And yes, MIPS can power-down sections of the core that are there but not<br />in use at any one instant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/hp-mini-210-makes-another-mysterious-appearance-at-hp-com.html#comment-35649</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16037#comment-35649</guid>
		<description>Is HP looking at ARM at all?   &lt;br&gt;OT -  I read that the i86 processors from Intel and AMD are doing some stuff that most users never use...  and that they should be simpler?  Does mobile use battery life suffers due to this? &lt;br&gt;see: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anandtech.com/show/3593&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/showpost.aspx?i...&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br&gt;If mobile battery life suffers then is that a good thing at all?  Hmmm,  Does ARM processor systems have the same problem?  In the end, first tech with mobile netbook with 15-20 hours per charge (with name brand depending) will be very popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is HP looking at ARM at all?   <br />OT &#8211;  I read that the i86 processors from Intel and AMD are doing some stuff that most users never use&#8230;  and that they should be simpler?  Does mobile use battery life suffers due to this? <br />see: <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/3593" rel="nofollow">http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/showpost.aspx?i&#8230;</a>  <br />If mobile battery life suffers then is that a good thing at all?  Hmmm,  Does ARM processor systems have the same problem?  In the end, first tech with mobile netbook with 15-20 hours per charge (with name brand depending) will be very popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Clarke</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/12/hp-mini-210-makes-another-mysterious-appearance-at-hp-com.html#comment-35642</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=16037#comment-35642</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s an ION refresh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#39;s an ION refresh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

