<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google explains Chrome OS: What it means for netbooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: wedding dresses</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-100310</link>
		<dc:creator>wedding dresses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-100310</guid>
		<description>Some of the demonstrated functionality would only feasibly work on a local (LAN) connection. Opening small documents is fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the demonstrated functionality would only feasibly work on a local (LAN) connection. Opening small documents is fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ideaquest</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-75730</link>
		<dc:creator>Ideaquest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-75730</guid>
		<description>One year on, the Apple iPad is a game changer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One year on, the Apple iPad is a game changer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sitex 2009 &#8211; Show Floor Coverage &#8211; Hardware Zone &#171; Acer laptops info from the UK</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-34249</link>
		<dc:creator>Sitex 2009 &#8211; Show Floor Coverage &#8211; Hardware Zone &#171; Acer laptops info from the UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-34249</guid>
		<description>[...] light weight OS built to support the Google Chrome web browser. The only apps that you’ll be able Better Acer laptops    Leave a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] light weight OS built to support the Google Chrome web browser. The only apps that you’ll be able Better Acer laptops    Leave a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoloMKXXVIII</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-47439</link>
		<dc:creator>BoloMKXXVIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-47439</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see what Google thinks is appropriate hardware for a Chrome device. Cheap devices with only SSDs means it will have little local storage. Since everything is cloud based I expect a 3G connection would almost be essential. Could it be that the wireless carriers will be the main distributors of such a device? They could be almost free with a 2 year contract. Not something I would be interested in though. As an alternative to Splashtop it might be useful, or maybe if it was run in a VM if it has some killer feature you want. Other than that, meh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see what Google thinks is appropriate hardware for a Chrome device. Cheap devices with only SSDs means it will have little local storage. Since everything is cloud based I expect a 3G connection would almost be essential. Could it be that the wireless carriers will be the main distributors of such a device? They could be almost free with a 2 year contract. Not something I would be interested in though. As an alternative to Splashtop it might be useful, or maybe if it was run in a VM if it has some killer feature you want. Other than that, meh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HP</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-47440</link>
		<dc:creator>HP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-47440</guid>
		<description>In the cloud-computing (CC) concept, the PDF would&#039;ve been created in the cloud, no uploading needed. Likewise, any media creation or acquisition (eg via iTunes) would also be stored online. What you&#039;re thinking of is a mixed environment, of both &#039;traditional&#039; computing and CC. A CC proponent would reply that since CC is the future, then any offline-online &quot;conversion&quot; is a temporary inconvenience needed for the transition.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I realize it sounds wobbly. Bandwidth is only one of the many objections CC faces. OTOH, CC does offer substantive benefits as well, although most of these are for the vendors rather than the end-user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the cloud-computing (CC) concept, the PDF would&#39;ve been created in the cloud, no uploading needed. Likewise, any media creation or acquisition (eg via iTunes) would also be stored online. What you&#39;re thinking of is a mixed environment, of both &#39;traditional&#39; computing and CC. A CC proponent would reply that since CC is the future, then any offline-online &#8220;conversion&#8221; is a temporary inconvenience needed for the transition.</p>
<p>Yes, I realize it sounds wobbly. Bandwidth is only one of the many objections CC faces. OTOH, CC does offer substantive benefits as well, although most of these are for the vendors rather than the end-user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoloMKXXVIII</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-33107</link>
		<dc:creator>BoloMKXXVIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-33107</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see what Google thinks is appropriate hardware for a Chrome device. Cheap devices with only SSDs means it will have little local storage. Since everything is cloud based I expect a 3G connection would almost be essential. Could it be that the wireless carriers will be the main distributors of such a device? They could be almost free with a 2 year contract. Not something I would be interested in though. As an alternative to Splashtop it might be useful, or maybe if it was run in a VM if it has some killer feature you want. Other than that, meh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see what Google thinks is appropriate hardware for a Chrome device. Cheap devices with only SSDs means it will have little local storage. Since everything is cloud based I expect a 3G connection would almost be essential. Could it be that the wireless carriers will be the main distributors of such a device? They could be almost free with a 2 year contract. Not something I would be interested in though. As an alternative to Splashtop it might be useful, or maybe if it was run in a VM if it has some killer feature you want. Other than that, meh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HP</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-33100</link>
		<dc:creator>HP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-33100</guid>
		<description>In the cloud-computing (CC) concept, the PDF would&#039;ve been created in the cloud, no uploading needed. Likewise, any media creation or acquisition (eg via iTunes) would also be stored online. What you&#039;re thinking of is a mixed environment, of both &#039;traditional&#039; computing and CC. A CC proponent would reply that since CC is the future, then any offline-online &quot;conversion&quot; is a temporary inconvenience needed for the transition.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I realize it sounds wobbly. Bandwidth is only one of the many objections CC faces. OTOH, CC does offer substantive benefits as well, although most of these are for the vendors rather than the end-user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the cloud-computing (CC) concept, the PDF would&#39;ve been created in the cloud, no uploading needed. Likewise, any media creation or acquisition (eg via iTunes) would also be stored online. What you&#39;re thinking of is a mixed environment, of both &#39;traditional&#39; computing and CC. A CC proponent would reply that since CC is the future, then any offline-online &#8220;conversion&#8221; is a temporary inconvenience needed for the transition.</p>
<p>Yes, I realize it sounds wobbly. Bandwidth is only one of the many objections CC faces. OTOH, CC does offer substantive benefits as well, although most of these are for the vendors rather than the end-user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Moneta</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-33082</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Moneta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-33082</guid>
		<description>That means that the PDF has been uploaded to Google, Google has converted the document, and you are seeing the resulting downloaded (and cached) HTML.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ChomeOS has no local applications, so there is no PDF viewer on the machine.  The resulting output can be cached for faster repeat viewing (until the cache entry is flushed), but the upload/download cycle is required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That means that the PDF has been uploaded to Google, Google has converted the document, and you are seeing the resulting downloaded (and cached) HTML.</p>
<p>ChomeOS has no local applications, so there is no PDF viewer on the machine.  The resulting output can be cached for faster repeat viewing (until the cache entry is flushed), but the upload/download cycle is required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raindog469</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-33083</link>
		<dc:creator>raindog469</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-33083</guid>
		<description>@Granville Gilbert: It&#039;s open source, so someone&#039;s bound to package it for existing netbooks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I hear &quot;device that doesn&#039;t run any native apps, only web apps&quot;, I think &quot;2GB flash, 7-inch screen, $99 on Black Friday next year&quot;.  Not that that&#039;s a bad thing, but at this point people assume that a laptop that costs 400 bucks is going to actually be a laptop and not an Internet appliance.  Even $200 laptops run full versions of XP or Ubuntu nowadays, and a 7 second boot time says &quot;Hyperspace minus Firefox&quot;.  But a $99 ARM-based thing that boots in 10 seconds would be fine.  I&#039;d buy one, as long as I could hack it and boot to a real OS when I wanted to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, if &quot;doesn&#039;t run native apps&quot; is implemented the same way as on Palm WebOS, it&#039;s a euphemism for &quot;the only way to run native apps is to write them as Mozilla plugins&quot;.  Does anyone really think this thing will forgo the &quot;real&quot; Adobe Flash plugin in favor of some Chrome/Gnash mashup that won&#039;t play Hulu videos?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, naming your browser and operating system the same thing as your competition&#039;s user interface layer is just obnoxious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Granville Gilbert: It&#39;s open source, so someone&#39;s bound to package it for existing netbooks.</p>
<p>When I hear &#8220;device that doesn&#39;t run any native apps, only web apps&#8221;, I think &#8220;2GB flash, 7-inch screen, $99 on Black Friday next year&#8221;.  Not that that&#39;s a bad thing, but at this point people assume that a laptop that costs 400 bucks is going to actually be a laptop and not an Internet appliance.  Even $200 laptops run full versions of XP or Ubuntu nowadays, and a 7 second boot time says &#8220;Hyperspace minus Firefox&#8221;.  But a $99 ARM-based thing that boots in 10 seconds would be fine.  I&#39;d buy one, as long as I could hack it and boot to a real OS when I wanted to.</p>
<p>Also, if &#8220;doesn&#39;t run native apps&#8221; is implemented the same way as on Palm WebOS, it&#39;s a euphemism for &#8220;the only way to run native apps is to write them as Mozilla plugins&#8221;.  Does anyone really think this thing will forgo the &#8220;real&#8221; Adobe Flash plugin in favor of some Chrome/Gnash mashup that won&#39;t play Hulu videos?</p>
<p>Finally, naming your browser and operating system the same thing as your competition&#39;s user interface layer is just obnoxious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-33081</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-33081</guid>
		<description>You can store and cache files locally and view them offline as well. Loading a PDF is just as fast as a website, through Google&#039;s instant &quot;view PDF as HTML&quot; feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can store and cache files locally and view them offline as well. Loading a PDF is just as fast as a website, through Google&#39;s instant &#8220;view PDF as HTML&#8221; feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-33079</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-33079</guid>
		<description>A larger screen and keyboard maximum ads about 30 dollars to the cost even less. You can source a 15 inch screen on the open market for not much more than 30 dollars more than a 10 inch screen. And the larger keyboard is basically the same price.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only reason Intel+Microsoft &quot;netbooks&quot; are small, is cause Intel+Microsoft are so very scared to take away all of their existing profit margins from larger sized laptops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A larger screen and keyboard maximum ads about 30 dollars to the cost even less. You can source a 15 inch screen on the open market for not much more than 30 dollars more than a 10 inch screen. And the larger keyboard is basically the same price.</p>
<p>The only reason Intel+Microsoft &#8220;netbooks&#8221; are small, is cause Intel+Microsoft are so very scared to take away all of their existing profit margins from larger sized laptops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-33078</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-33078</guid>
		<description>You can download Chromium OS today and install it on your current netbook using a USB stick. No problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It just is, Google is planning for 50-100 dollar netbooks to be available with Chrome OS pre-installed. That will be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can download Chromium OS today and install it on your current netbook using a USB stick. No problem.</p>
<p>It just is, Google is planning for 50-100 dollar netbooks to be available with Chrome OS pre-installed. That will be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Moneta</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-33080</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Moneta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-33080</guid>
		<description>A major problem I see for any cloud computing at this point is the asymmetrical bandwidth.  While downloads are fine in most places, upload speeds are glacial in comparison.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some of the demonstrated functionality would only feasibly work on a local (LAN) connection.  Opening small documents is fine.  However, since everything is sent to the cloud, large documents (for example big PDFs, videos, the 150 photos on your camera) will take many minutes (possibly hours) to open.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People that don&#039;t understand what is happening will invariably consider the function broken.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Likewise, I&#039;m not sure the content companies will be happy that you are copying and uploading content to Google.  Some content on your computer has restricted copyright and even backups are prohibited.  While the end-user has no control over this process when using ChomeOS, legally I&#039;m pretty sure they will be the ones that are responsible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In short, until bandwidth reaches the magical 100Mb/s/100Mbs and content companies give up control over their media, cloud-based computing is a hot mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A major problem I see for any cloud computing at this point is the asymmetrical bandwidth.  While downloads are fine in most places, upload speeds are glacial in comparison.</p>
<p>Some of the demonstrated functionality would only feasibly work on a local (LAN) connection.  Opening small documents is fine.  However, since everything is sent to the cloud, large documents (for example big PDFs, videos, the 150 photos on your camera) will take many minutes (possibly hours) to open.</p>
<p>People that don&#39;t understand what is happening will invariably consider the function broken.</p>
<p>Likewise, I&#39;m not sure the content companies will be happy that you are copying and uploading content to Google.  Some content on your computer has restricted copyright and even backups are prohibited.  While the end-user has no control over this process when using ChomeOS, legally I&#39;m pretty sure they will be the ones that are responsible.</p>
<p>In short, until bandwidth reaches the magical 100Mb/s/100Mbs and content companies give up control over their media, cloud-based computing is a hot mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-33069</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-33069</guid>
		<description>Google says they expect ChromeOS to be for netbooks. Then they say the devices will have bigger screens, bigger keyboards, and must have an SSD. They also mentioned support for multi-core processors. Adding all that will probably bring up the prices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How can something fitting that description still be called a netbook?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Granted, the current definition was made by Microsoft and Intel, but it&#039;s pretty well established. Netbooks are small, cheap laptops. If it isn&#039;t small or cheap, then it&#039;s just a laptop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google says they expect ChromeOS to be for netbooks. Then they say the devices will have bigger screens, bigger keyboards, and must have an SSD. They also mentioned support for multi-core processors. Adding all that will probably bring up the prices.</p>
<p>How can something fitting that description still be called a netbook?</p>
<p>Granted, the current definition was made by Microsoft and Intel, but it&#39;s pretty well established. Netbooks are small, cheap laptops. If it isn&#39;t small or cheap, then it&#39;s just a laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/11/google-explains-chrome-os-what-it-means-for-netbooks.html#comment-33065</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15280#comment-33065</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll wait for the Google Gold or Platinum OS. Let&#039;em work the bugs out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll wait for the Google Gold or Platinum OS. Let&#39;em work the bugs out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

