<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor: Intel to allow Atom-powered netbooks with 2GB of RAM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/10/rumor-intel-to-allow-atom-powered-netbooks-with-2gb-of-ram.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/10/rumor-intel-to-allow-atom-powered-netbooks-with-2gb-of-ram.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/10/rumor-intel-to-allow-atom-powered-netbooks-with-2gb-of-ram.html#comment-48036</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14213#comment-48036</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no need to be a jerk. Yeah, he got this one wrong, but Brad does a pretty god job overall with this blog (you ARE reading it after all, aren&#039;t you?). Might be nice to avoid Fudzilla in the future, though. It isn&#039;t really even a reliable source for rumors, much less analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s no need to be a jerk. Yeah, he got this one wrong, but Brad does a pretty god job overall with this blog (you ARE reading it after all, aren&#39;t you?). Might be nice to avoid Fudzilla in the future, though. It isn&#39;t really even a reliable source for rumors, much less analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigGoofyGuy</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/10/rumor-intel-to-allow-atom-powered-netbooks-with-2gb-of-ram.html#comment-48035</link>
		<dc:creator>BigGoofyGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14213#comment-48035</guid>
		<description>Personally, there should be a restriction on how much ram one can or could add to ones computer. The limit should be in the technology and not in what one company says you can or can not do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, there should be a restriction on how much ram one can or could add to ones computer. The limit should be in the technology and not in what one company says you can or can not do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomleemullins</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/10/rumor-intel-to-allow-atom-powered-netbooks-with-2gb-of-ram.html#comment-31240</link>
		<dc:creator>tomleemullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14213#comment-31240</guid>
		<description>Personally, there should be a restriction on how much ram one can or could add to ones computer. The limit should be in the technology and not in what one company says you can or can not do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, there should be a restriction on how much ram one can or could add to ones computer. The limit should be in the technology and not in what one company says you can or can not do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/10/rumor-intel-to-allow-atom-powered-netbooks-with-2gb-of-ram.html#comment-31235</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14213#comment-31235</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no need to be a jerk. Yeah, he got this one wrong, but Brad does a pretty god job overall with this blog (you ARE reading it after all, aren&#039;t you?). Might be nice to avoid Fudzilla in the future, though. It isn&#039;t really even a reliable source for rumors, much less analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s no need to be a jerk. Yeah, he got this one wrong, but Brad does a pretty god job overall with this blog (you ARE reading it after all, aren&#39;t you?). Might be nice to avoid Fudzilla in the future, though. It isn&#39;t really even a reliable source for rumors, much less analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meyers</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/10/rumor-intel-to-allow-atom-powered-netbooks-with-2gb-of-ram.html#comment-31200</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14213#comment-31200</guid>
		<description>Your article is complete nonsense, and typical of bloggers who post based on no real knowledge except how they &quot;feel&quot;. Intel imposes no RAM limit on netbooks. Microsoft imposed a 1gb ram limit ON WINDOWS XP NETBOOKS ONLY. If there was a 1gb limit on Intel Atom based netbooks, how do you explain the new Asus 1008HA Premium. 10.1&quot; screen, Intel Atom N280, 2gb RAM, 320gb Harddrive? DO SOME RESEARCH BEFORE YOU POST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article is complete nonsense, and typical of bloggers who post based on no real knowledge except how they &#8220;feel&#8221;. Intel imposes no RAM limit on netbooks. Microsoft imposed a 1gb ram limit ON WINDOWS XP NETBOOKS ONLY. If there was a 1gb limit on Intel Atom based netbooks, how do you explain the new Asus 1008HA Premium. 10.1&#8243; screen, Intel Atom N280, 2gb RAM, 320gb Harddrive? DO SOME RESEARCH BEFORE YOU POST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/10/rumor-intel-to-allow-atom-powered-netbooks-with-2gb-of-ram.html#comment-31198</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14213#comment-31198</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how this anything to do with Intel, which has supported 2GB of RAM since the first N270-powered netbook hit the shelves. It has been Microsoft that has been hobbling netbooks with 1GB of RAM for questionably legal reasons about which we can only speculate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://apcmag.com/microsoft_hobbles_xp_mininotes_with_1gb_ram_limit.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://apcmag.com/microsoft_hobbles_xp_mininote...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I read some talk of Microsoft keeping the 1GB cap for Windows 7 Starter Edition, but I haven&#039;t found any solid information either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t see how this anything to do with Intel, which has supported 2GB of RAM since the first N270-powered netbook hit the shelves. It has been Microsoft that has been hobbling netbooks with 1GB of RAM for questionably legal reasons about which we can only speculate.</p>
<p><a href="http://apcmag.com/microsoft_hobbles_xp_mininotes_with_1gb_ram_limit.htm" rel="nofollow">http://apcmag.com/microsoft_hobbles_xp_mininote&#8230;</a></p>
<p>I read some talk of Microsoft keeping the 1GB cap for Windows 7 Starter Edition, but I haven&#39;t found any solid information either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Vargas</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/10/rumor-intel-to-allow-atom-powered-netbooks-with-2gb-of-ram.html#comment-31183</link>
		<dc:creator>David Vargas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14213#comment-31183</guid>
		<description>Go to HP&#039;s website and choose the HP mini 311 with windows 7. It&#039;ll allow you to upgrade up to a 320gb Drive with 4gb of ram.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to HP&#39;s website and choose the HP mini 311 with windows 7. It&#39;ll allow you to upgrade up to a 320gb Drive with 4gb of ram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Linder</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/10/rumor-intel-to-allow-atom-powered-netbooks-with-2gb-of-ram.html#comment-31187</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14213#comment-31187</guid>
		<description>True, but an 11.6 inch machine with NVIDIA ION graphics doesn&#039;t exactly fall&lt;br&gt;within the standard definition of a netbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but an 11.6 inch machine with NVIDIA ION graphics doesn&#39;t exactly fall<br />within the standard definition of a netbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoloMKXXVIII</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/10/rumor-intel-to-allow-atom-powered-netbooks-with-2gb-of-ram.html#comment-31178</link>
		<dc:creator>BoloMKXXVIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14213#comment-31178</guid>
		<description>Makes sense. All versions of 7 want at least 2 GB of RAM. Sure it will run with less, but not as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense. All versions of 7 want at least 2 GB of RAM. Sure it will run with less, but not as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

