<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toshiba launches thin and light laptops with Intel CULV chips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/09/toshiba-launches-thin-and-light-laptops-with-intel-culv-chips.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/09/toshiba-launches-thin-and-light-laptops-with-intel-culv-chips.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Toshiba launches new laptops with Intel CULV chips</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/09/toshiba-launches-thin-and-light-laptops-with-intel-culv-chips.html#comment-29226</link>
		<dc:creator>Toshiba launches new laptops with Intel CULV chips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=13240#comment-29226</guid>
		<description>[...] via liliputing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via liliputing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyKing1969</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/09/toshiba-launches-thin-and-light-laptops-with-intel-culv-chips.html#comment-48555</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyKing1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=13240#comment-48555</guid>
		<description>Why would I want a nearly 4 lb 13&quot; computer?  The specs are blip up from a netbook, but lugging that 64oz will be a pain [Quite Literally] in the back.  This computrers seems like a throw back to five years ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Today there are 8 oz handheld computers.  There are 10&quot; screen 1.5 lbs netbooks nearly out.  People have choices and most of them are lighter weight.  The old math equation where a 4 lbs &#039;small&#039; computer makes sense no longer adds up.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They need to shave &#039;a pound&#039; off those devices.  I don&#039;t care if that seem light weight for a 13&quot; screen, these are NEW models competing with what was acceptable two years ago isn&#039;t good enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would I want a nearly 4 lb 13&#8243; computer?  The specs are blip up from a netbook, but lugging that 64oz will be a pain [Quite Literally] in the back.  This computrers seems like a throw back to five years ago.</p>
<p>Today there are 8 oz handheld computers.  There are 10&#8243; screen 1.5 lbs netbooks nearly out.  People have choices and most of them are lighter weight.  The old math equation where a 4 lbs &#39;small&#39; computer makes sense no longer adds up.  </p>
<p>They need to shave &#39;a pound&#39; off those devices.  I don&#39;t care if that seem light weight for a 13&#8243; screen, these are NEW models competing with what was acceptable two years ago isn&#39;t good enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyKing1969</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/09/toshiba-launches-thin-and-light-laptops-with-intel-culv-chips.html#comment-29099</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyKing1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=13240#comment-29099</guid>
		<description>Why would I want a nearly 4 lb 13&quot; computer?  The specs are blip up from a netbook, but lugging that 64oz will be a pain [Quite Literally] in the back.  This computrers seems like a throw back to five years ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Today there are 8 oz handheld computers.  There are 10&quot; screen 1.5 lbs netbooks nearly out.  People have choices and most of them are lighter weight.  The old math equation where a 4 lbs &#039;small&#039; computer makes sense no longer adds up.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They need to shave &#039;a pound&#039; off those devices.  I don&#039;t care if that seem light weight for a 13&quot; screen, these are NEW models competing with what was acceptable two years ago isn&#039;t good enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would I want a nearly 4 lb 13&#8243; computer?  The specs are blip up from a netbook, but lugging that 64oz will be a pain [Quite Literally] in the back.  This computrers seems like a throw back to five years ago.</p>
<p>Today there are 8 oz handheld computers.  There are 10&#8243; screen 1.5 lbs netbooks nearly out.  People have choices and most of them are lighter weight.  The old math equation where a 4 lbs &#39;small&#39; computer makes sense no longer adds up.  </p>
<p>They need to shave &#39;a pound&#39; off those devices.  I don&#39;t care if that seem light weight for a 13&#8243; screen, these are NEW models competing with what was acceptable two years ago isn&#39;t good enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

