<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualcomm responds to &#8220;smartbook&#8221; trademark claim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/09/qualcomm-responds-to-smartbook-trademark-claim.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/09/qualcomm-responds-to-smartbook-trademark-claim.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 07:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: toddma</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/09/qualcomm-responds-to-smartbook-trademark-claim.html#comment-47676</link>
		<dc:creator>toddma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=12207#comment-47676</guid>
		<description>from what i gather this is common in Germany for companies to sue smaller companies rather than go after the big dogs who are also using the term.  actually found that out at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smartbook.asia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.smartbook.asia&lt;/a&gt; through their news.  weird practice if you ask me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from what i gather this is common in Germany for companies to sue smaller companies rather than go after the big dogs who are also using the term.  actually found that out at <a href="http://www.smartbook.asia" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartbook.asia</a> through their news.  weird practice if you ask me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toddma</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/09/qualcomm-responds-to-smartbook-trademark-claim.html#comment-27463</link>
		<dc:creator>toddma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=12207#comment-27463</guid>
		<description>from what i gather this is common in Germany for companies to sue smaller companies rather than go after the big dogs who are also using the term.  actually found that out at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smartbook.asia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.smartbook.asia&lt;/a&gt; through their news.  weird practice if you ask me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from what i gather this is common in Germany for companies to sue smaller companies rather than go after the big dogs who are also using the term.  actually found that out at <a href="http://www.smartbook.asia" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartbook.asia</a> through their news.  weird practice if you ask me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyKing1969</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/09/qualcomm-responds-to-smartbook-trademark-claim.html#comment-27435</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyKing1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=12207#comment-27435</guid>
		<description>Do they hold the German trademark or do they merely have the paperwork in for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do they hold the German trademark or do they merely have the paperwork in for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/09/qualcomm-responds-to-smartbook-trademark-claim.html#comment-27416</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=12207#comment-27416</guid>
		<description>Well there was book digital....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They sold a device called a Smartbook G138 (and it was a mini netbook type device with an arm processor, 7&quot; screen and GPRS).  So I seriously think Qualcomm will have trouble proving it is generic when there were actually devices from a specific company sold retail under that name that are in exactly the same product category they are aiming the term at....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Surprised this trademark owner hasn&#039;t stepped up to the plate.  I think book digital may be away but guess someone must own the rights to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there was book digital&#8230;.</p>
<p>They sold a device called a Smartbook G138 (and it was a mini netbook type device with an arm processor, 7&#8243; screen and GPRS).  So I seriously think Qualcomm will have trouble proving it is generic when there were actually devices from a specific company sold retail under that name that are in exactly the same product category they are aiming the term at&#8230;.</p>
<p>Surprised this trademark owner hasn&#39;t stepped up to the plate.  I think book digital may be away but guess someone must own the rights to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

