Comments on: Samsung N310 “Go” get a bit more power for Singapore market http://liliputing.com/2009/08/samsung-n310-go-get-a-bit-more-power-for-singapore-market.html Compact Computing Sat, 26 May 2012 03:09:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Mikez http://liliputing.com/2009/08/samsung-n310-go-get-a-bit-more-power-for-singapore-market.html#comment-47076 Mikez Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:36:32 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=11915#comment-47076 Oops -<br><a href="http://www.aaeon.com.tw/PD_Products_Detail_0754DED8CBA24C4580_9CDD91AAFD5542A89C_395462FBAF8249A594_BIG5_UTF-8.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.aaeon.com.tw/PD_Products_Detail_0754...</a> Oops -
http://www.aaeon.com.tw/PD_Products_Detail_0754…

]]> By: Mikez http://liliputing.com/2009/08/samsung-n310-go-get-a-bit-more-power-for-singapore-market.html#comment-47075 Mikez Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:33:39 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=11915#comment-47075 Yes, it is strange that they seem to be ignoring the opportunity -<br>even after having a foot in the door with the C7-M.<br>They already have paid the license fees for Intel's P-6 core design,<br>which, although a 1995 design still is the best performance per watt<br>and best performance per clock that Intel has come up with.<br>And the newest C7-M processors throttle back to less than 1watt, tpd.<br>But I have only seen one new "design win" by VIA in the past year (see: aaeon.com). Yes, it is strange that they seem to be ignoring the opportunity -
even after having a foot in the door with the C7-M.
They already have paid the license fees for Intel's P-6 core design,
which, although a 1995 design still is the best performance per watt
and best performance per clock that Intel has come up with.
And the newest C7-M processors throttle back to less than 1watt, tpd.
But I have only seen one new “design win” by VIA in the past year (see: aaeon.com).

]]> By: Mikez http://liliputing.com/2009/08/samsung-n310-go-get-a-bit-more-power-for-singapore-market.html#comment-26976 Mikez Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:36:32 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=11915#comment-26976 Oops -<br><a href="http://www.aaeon.com.tw/PD_Products_Detail_0754DED8CBA24C4580_9CDD91AAFD5542A89C_395462FBAF8249A594_BIG5_UTF-8.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.aaeon.com.tw/PD_Products_Detail_0754...</a> Oops -
http://www.aaeon.com.tw/PD_Products_Detail_0754…

]]> By: Mikez http://liliputing.com/2009/08/samsung-n310-go-get-a-bit-more-power-for-singapore-market.html#comment-26975 Mikez Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:33:39 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=11915#comment-26975 Yes, it is strange that they seem to be ignoring the opportunity -<br>even after having a foot in the door with the C7-M.<br>They already have paid the license fees for Intel's P-6 core design,<br>which, although a 1995 design still is the best performance per watt<br>and best performance per clock that Intel has come up with.<br>And the newest C7-M processors throttle back to less than 1watt, tpd.<br>But I have only seen one new "design win" by VIA in the past year (see: aaeon.com). Yes, it is strange that they seem to be ignoring the opportunity -
even after having a foot in the door with the C7-M.
They already have paid the license fees for Intel's P-6 core design,
which, although a 1995 design still is the best performance per watt
and best performance per clock that Intel has come up with.
And the newest C7-M processors throttle back to less than 1watt, tpd.
But I have only seen one new “design win” by VIA in the past year (see: aaeon.com).

]]> By: BoloMKXXVIII http://liliputing.com/2009/08/samsung-n310-go-get-a-bit-more-power-for-singapore-market.html#comment-26963 BoloMKXXVIII Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:33:51 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=11915#comment-26963 Intel is not interested in giving Atom processors more performance. They would then compete with their (currently) much faster and higher profit margin lines. Better graphics performance and power savings is all we are likely to see. AMD and Via have such a huge window of opportunity that they don't seem to be exploiting. Imagine Intel giving them a sector that they can't/won't compete in. Intel is not interested in giving Atom processors more performance. They would then compete with their (currently) much faster and higher profit margin lines. Better graphics performance and power savings is all we are likely to see. AMD and Via have such a huge window of opportunity that they don't seem to be exploiting. Imagine Intel giving them a sector that they can't/won't compete in.

]]> By: DougC3 http://liliputing.com/2009/08/samsung-n310-go-get-a-bit-more-power-for-singapore-market.html#comment-26953 DougC3 Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:56:45 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=11915#comment-26953 By the way, what ever happened to the chipset that was supposed to make there be a greater difference between the performance of these two proccessors? By the way, what ever happened to the chipset that was supposed to make there be a greater difference between the performance of these two proccessors?

]]> By: Mikez http://liliputing.com/2009/08/samsung-n310-go-get-a-bit-more-power-for-singapore-market.html#comment-26937 Mikez Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:44:49 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=11915#comment-26937 Oops: log(1.66) - log(1.60) [0.01598]<br>But the point remains - the only way a user might notice this <br>difference is by comparing hardware benchmark reports. ;) Oops: log(1.66) – log(1.60) [0.01598]
But the point remains – the only way a user might notice this
difference is by comparing hardware benchmark reports. ;)

]]> By: Mikez http://liliputing.com/2009/08/samsung-n310-go-get-a-bit-more-power-for-singapore-market.html#comment-26936 Mikez Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:36:53 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=11915#comment-26936 Even less than that - these are variable speed processors -<br>But even if the owner has locked them at "full speed only" -<br><br>Well, the human subjective response system is essentially<br>logarithmic (like the other senses) - - who will notice +log(0.04)? Even less than that – these are variable speed processors -
But even if the owner has locked them at “full speed only” -

Well, the human subjective response system is essentially
logarithmic (like the other senses) – - who will notice +log(0.04)?

]]> By: tromp http://liliputing.com/2009/08/samsung-n310-go-get-a-bit-more-power-for-singapore-market.html#comment-26935 tromp Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:24:07 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=11915#comment-26935 Brad has a way of overqualifying his statements:-)<br><br>Is he suggesting that some folks might "see a huge difference in performance", when that difference is only 4%?<br><br>It suffices to say that "few people will notice the slight difference in performance". Brad has a way of overqualifying his statements:-)

Is he suggesting that some folks might “see a huge difference in performance”, when that difference is only 4%?

It suffices to say that “few people will notice the slight difference in performance”.

]]> By: MonkeyKing1969 http://liliputing.com/2009/08/samsung-n310-go-get-a-bit-more-power-for-singapore-market.html#comment-26929 MonkeyKing1969 Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:50:11 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=11915#comment-26929 Well, we might see 802.11n on future netbooks from Samsung...maybe. As you said not much help unless you in range of an N-device that hasn't been back-throttled by a b/g device on the network as well. Well, we might see 802.11n on future netbooks from Samsung…maybe. As you said not much help unless you in range of an N-device that hasn't been back-throttled by a b/g device on the network as well.

]]>