liliputing logo
  • Home
  • Products
  • Top stories
  • Reviews
  • Deals
  • Ultrabooks
  • Contact
  • About
 

Samsung N310 “Go” get a bit more power for Singapore market

  • Tweet
  • Email

In the US, the Samsung Go (which is called the Samsung N310 in every other corner of the planet), has your basic netbook specs including a 1.6GHz Intel Atom N270 processor, 802.11b/g WiFi, and a 6 cell battery. But it turns out the version on sale in Singapore is a little more powerful, thanks to a 1.66GHz Intel Atom N280 processor. The Singapore version also has 802.11b/g/draft-n WiFi.

All told, most folks probably won’t see a huge difference in performance. And if you have an 802.11n network in your home, it’d probably be cheaper to pick up a USB 802.11n adapter than to order the Singapore model and ship it overseas. But it’s interesting to see that the configuration varies slightly from country to country.

via Netbooked and SammyNetbook Forum

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed, follow us on Twitter, or "like" us on Facebook. Thanks for visiting!

Samsung N310

powered bygdgt

  • key specs
  • reviews • 1
  • prices
  • TypeNetbook
  • Screen size10.1 inches
  • Screen resolution1024 x 600
  • Bundled OSWindows (XP)
  • CPU familyAtom
  • Processor speed1.6 GHz
  • System RAM1 GB
  • Maximum battery lifeUp to 5 hours
see all specs →
8.0 average user rating
  • Speed and features—
  • Design and form factor—
  • Battery life—
  • Display—
  • Durability—
  • Expandability—
  • Noise—
  • Portability (size / weight)—

Get better reviews from people who actually have this product!

write a reviewsee all reviews →
Posted on Tuesday, August 25th, 2009, 4:26 pm by Brad Linder




  • MonkeyKing1969

    Well, we might see 802.11n on future netbooks from Samsung…maybe. As you said not much help unless you in range of an N-device that hasn't been back-throttled by a b/g device on the network as well.

  • tromp

    Brad has a way of overqualifying his statements:-)

    Is he suggesting that some folks might “see a huge difference in performance”, when that difference is only 4%?

    It suffices to say that “few people will notice the slight difference in performance”.

  • Mikez

    Even less than that – these are variable speed processors -
    But even if the owner has locked them at “full speed only” -

    Well, the human subjective response system is essentially
    logarithmic (like the other senses) – - who will notice +log(0.04)?

  • Mikez

    Oops: log(1.66) – log(1.60) [0.01598]
    But the point remains – the only way a user might notice this
    difference is by comparing hardware benchmark reports. ;)

  • DougC3

    By the way, what ever happened to the chipset that was supposed to make there be a greater difference between the performance of these two proccessors?

  • BoloMKXXVIII

    Intel is not interested in giving Atom processors more performance. They would then compete with their (currently) much faster and higher profit margin lines. Better graphics performance and power savings is all we are likely to see. AMD and Via have such a huge window of opportunity that they don't seem to be exploiting. Imagine Intel giving them a sector that they can't/won't compete in.

  • Mikez

    Yes, it is strange that they seem to be ignoring the opportunity -
    even after having a foot in the door with the C7-M.
    They already have paid the license fees for Intel's P-6 core design,
    which, although a 1995 design still is the best performance per watt
    and best performance per clock that Intel has come up with.
    And the newest C7-M processors throttle back to less than 1watt, tpd.
    But I have only seen one new “design win” by VIA in the past year (see: aaeon.com).

  • Mikez

    Oops -
    http://www.aaeon.com.tw/PD_Products_Detail_0754…

  • Mikez

    Yes, it is strange that they seem to be ignoring the opportunity -
    even after having a foot in the door with the C7-M.
    They already have paid the license fees for Intel's P-6 core design,
    which, although a 1995 design still is the best performance per watt
    and best performance per clock that Intel has come up with.
    And the newest C7-M processors throttle back to less than 1watt, tpd.
    But I have only seen one new “design win” by VIA in the past year (see: aaeon.com).

  • Mikez

    Oops -
    http://www.aaeon.com.tw/PD_Products_Detail_0754…

Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube RSS

Recent Posts

  • Homemade Mondrian PC case shows that mini-PCs can be pretty
  • Cisco pulls the plug on Cius tablet for enterprise
  • HP Pavilion dm1 gets a Brazos 2.0 CPU upgrade… in Malaysia

Latest Products



Popular Discussions

Powered by Disqus

Featured Videos

  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (7.0) video review - Liliputing
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (7.0) video review - Liliputing
  • Kupa X11 tablet with Windows 8 Preview
    Kupa X11 tablet with Windows 8 Preview
mobiputing logo

Latest news from Mobiputing

  • Absinthe 2.0 untethered jailbreak for iOS 5.1.1 now available
  • Unofficially unlock AT&T HTC One X bootloader (with official tools)
  • Android apps can now use in-app billing for subscription content



2007-2012 Liliputing

Advertising | Privacy | TOP