<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung Go (N310) reviewed, gets 8.5 hours battery life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/07/samsung-go-n310-reviewed-gets-8-5-hours-battery-life.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/07/samsung-go-n310-reviewed-gets-8-5-hours-battery-life.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: mylaptopbattery</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/07/samsung-go-n310-reviewed-gets-8-5-hours-battery-life.html#comment-54222</link>
		<dc:creator>mylaptopbattery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=10985#comment-54222</guid>
		<description>such a good idea,Is it really use such a  long time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>such a good idea,Is it really use such a  long time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  laptop batteries </title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/07/samsung-go-n310-reviewed-gets-8-5-hours-battery-life.html#comment-54155</link>
		<dc:creator> laptop batteries </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 12:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=10985#comment-54155</guid>
		<description>yes,we know when N510 come down the pike in a few months that opinion might change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes,we know when N510 come down the pike in a few months that opinion might change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fer</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/07/samsung-go-n310-reviewed-gets-8-5-hours-battery-life.html#comment-48983</link>
		<dc:creator>Fer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=10985#comment-48983</guid>
		<description>And when that 6 cell battery in Europe??????????????????????????&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;EUROPE exists in the world too, Samsung!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4 cell for Europe and 6 cell battery for US???. Well, never again buying anything from Samsung then!! Never again, GO and buy your garbage in USA!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And when that 6 cell battery in Europe??????????????????????????</p>
<p>EUROPE exists in the world too, Samsung!!!!!!</p>
<p>4 cell for Europe and 6 cell battery for US???. Well, never again buying anything from Samsung then!! Never again, GO and buy your garbage in USA!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fer</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/07/samsung-go-n310-reviewed-gets-8-5-hours-battery-life.html#comment-31134</link>
		<dc:creator>Fer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=10985#comment-31134</guid>
		<description>And when that 6 cell battery in Europe??????????????????????????&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;EUROPE exists in the world too, Samsung!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4 cell for Europe and 6 cell battery for US???. Well, never again buying anything from Samsung then!! Never again, GO and buy your garbage in USA!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And when that 6 cell battery in Europe??????????????????????????</p>
<p>EUROPE exists in the world too, Samsung!!!!!!</p>
<p>4 cell for Europe and 6 cell battery for US???. Well, never again buying anything from Samsung then!! Never again, GO and buy your garbage in USA!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Computing News Links for July 27th &#124; UMPCPortal - Ultra Mobile Personal Computing</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/07/samsung-go-n310-reviewed-gets-8-5-hours-battery-life.html#comment-24841</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile Computing News Links for July 27th &#124; UMPCPortal - Ultra Mobile Personal Computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=10985#comment-24841</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted Samsung Go (N310) reviewed, gets 8.5 hours battery life [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted Samsung Go (N310) reviewed, gets 8.5 hours battery life [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Netbook Update – 7/27 &#124; UMPCPortal - Ultra Mobile Personal Computing</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/07/samsung-go-n310-reviewed-gets-8-5-hours-battery-life.html#comment-24740</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Netbook Update – 7/27 &#124; UMPCPortal - Ultra Mobile Personal Computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=10985#comment-24740</guid>
		<description>[...] Samsung Go (N310) reviewed, gets 8.5 hours battery life – The Samsung N310 [Portal page] which we saw several months ago is being branded as the Samsung Go in the US. Apparently its standard 6-cell battery is good for 8.5 hours which is quite impressive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Samsung Go (N310) reviewed, gets 8.5 hours battery life – The Samsung N310 [Portal page] which we saw several months ago is being branded as the Samsung Go in the US. Apparently its standard 6-cell battery is good for 8.5 hours which is quite impressive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyKing1969</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/07/samsung-go-n310-reviewed-gets-8-5-hours-battery-life.html#comment-24537</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyKing1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=10985#comment-24537</guid>
		<description>Well, $449 is not too bad for a price point, I say that given that the NC10 at launch was $489 and NC10 is $389 now.  If the screen were not reflective I would tell people to buy it without any hesitation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, when N510 come down the pike in a few months that opinion might change.  Although, N510 is sure to be a $499 or above product when it arrives this fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, $449 is not too bad for a price point, I say that given that the NC10 at launch was $489 and NC10 is $389 now.  If the screen were not reflective I would tell people to buy it without any hesitation.</p>
<p>But, when N510 come down the pike in a few months that opinion might change.  Although, N510 is sure to be a $499 or above product when it arrives this fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

