liliputing logo
  • Home
  • Products
  • Top stories
  • Reviews
  • Deals
  • Ultrabooks
  • Contact
  • About
 

Report: Lenovo, Samsung lose preferential pricing for Intel Atom CPUs

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like Microsoft, which only sells low cost Windows XP licenses to PC makers with netbooks and nettops that meet specific criteria, Intel reportedly has certain restrictions on the way its Atom processor is used. Intel’s restrictions aren’t quite as absolute. Fail to meet the requirements and you can still purchase the processor, you’ll just have to pay more. DigiTimes is reporting that Samsung and Lenovo have both released or announced Atom-based products that don’t fit into Intel’s little box, and as a result, both companies have lost their preferential pricing for the Intel Atom N270 CPU.

According to DigiTimes, Lenovo and Samsung’s big sin was to announce Atom-powered laptops with 11.6 to 12.1 inch displays. But they’re hardly the only companies to do so. Acer, Dell, and Asus also have larger Atom-powred laptops that are either available or in the works. I’m guessing Intel’s real beef with Lenovo and Samsung is that the Lenovo IdeaPad S12 and Samsung N510 will both be available with NVIDIA’s Ion platform, which bundles the Atom processor with NVIDIA graphics instead of Intel’s 945GSE chipset and GMA 950 graphics.

There’s no word on how much that preferential pricing is actually worth, so it’s tough to say whether Lenovo and Samsung’s decision to offer these machines will result in higher prices all around for their netbooks or not.

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed, follow us on Twitter, or "like" us on Facebook. Thanks for visiting!

Posted on Monday, July 6th, 2009, 7:52 am by Brad Linder




  • Raziel

    If Intel keeps acting this way, the Nano and Neo may gain a bigger foothold….

    Which is fine by me. Bring on the competition. I'd like to see a greater variety in these netbooks!

  • Pingback: Report: Lenovo, Samsung lose preferential pricing for Intel Atom CPUs | Tech Talk

  • Mikez

    It sounds to me as if both companies are treading in “anti-competitive” waters.
    Unfortunately, our legal system is slow and very expensive -
    It will take time and someone with very deep pockets to challenge them.

  • Pingback: Lenovo

  • hehz0r

    Hopefully at least either Lenovo or Samsung, preferrably both, will release 12″ netbooks with matte screens, and perhaps better processors than Atom?

  • DougC3

    Traditionally, when you buy something, you own it and can use it in any legal fashion you please. For example, McDonalds doesn't give a fig how you eat their hamburgers and probably wishes you would feed a few to your dog.

    The controls used by Intel and MS seem to be edging a bit toward the pernicious. Maybe there are precedents for this sort of thing in technology, the TV industry or perhaps the movie industry.

    What are some other examples of this sort of control?

  • MonkeyKing1969

    On the bright side there is a good possibility that the 11″ netbooks will be the next big seller, thus putting Samsung and Lenovo out in front of the competition.

    As netbooks become more mainstream they will need to satisfy more mainstream tastes in a similar curve. Your average consumer will like an 11″ screen especially if, like the N510, it weighs nearly that same as a 10″ netbook.

  • BoloMKXXVIII

    Or the next big thing could be going back to 9″ models using ARM processors and Intel could be partially responsible for sliting their own throat with higher prices.

  • LinuxLover

    Smells like an anti-trust case to me…

  • darvf

    Intel is pretty shifty with regard to their Atom pricing: you can either get the standalone chip for $45, or the chip plus the crappy GMA950 chipset for $25. Obviously, Intel is a profit-motivated company, so they wouldn't do this for any reason but to discourage better chipsets being paired with their CPU. I'm certain that were the prices reversed, you'd see the GMA950 disappear from the face of the earth in one hardware cycle.

    It's funny though – the pricing is almost just if not for the existence of better alternative chipsets – the typical Atom chipset handicaps the computer as a whole by crippling its GPU capability and I/O ports, and it literally is worth less from a utilitarian standpoint than similar systems with newer chipsets. A bit like buying an untrained packhorse vs buying a trained packhorse with cement blocks for shoes.

    I'm hoping this loss of preferential pricing will help push Samsung and Lenovo to abandon all typical netbook chipsets and go for worthwhile netbooks with ATI and NVIDIA parts (or just skip to AMD and VIA systems altogether).

    I didn't want a GMA950 in my future Thinkpad netbook, anyway :P

  • Dynamo

    Via Nano, or AMD Neo or Intel CLUV could be replace Atom

  • Dynamo

    Via Nano, or AMD Neo or Intel CLUV could be replace Atom

  • Pingback: Latest computer industry scuttle for July 27th, 2009 « RJM Computers Boise Blog – Main Site at www.rjmpc.com

Google+ facebook icon Facebook twitter icon Twitter facebook icon YouTube rss icon RSS

Recent Posts

  • No Flash plugin for Windows 8 on ARM: Another nail in the Flash coffin?
  • JetWay Mini ITX motherboard features Cedar Trail processor
  • First look at Shuttle’s new Cedar Trail, fanless computers

Featured Videos

  • Amazon Kindle Fire with MIUI 4.0 (Android 4.0)
    Amazon Kindle Fire with MIUI 4.0 (Android 4.0)
  • CyanogenMod 9 Alpha on the Kindle Fire
    CyanogenMod 9 Alpha on the Kindle Fire
  • CyanogenMod 9 Alpha 0.6 on the HP TouchPad
    CyanogenMod 9 Alpha 0.6 on the HP TouchPad






2007-2012 Liliputing

Advertising | Privacy | TOP