http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html Compact Computing Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:17:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html#comment-48821 zima Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:34:10 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=9791#comment-48821 Intel created the Classmate as a direct response to OLPC XO-1; to not let competitors create/dominate new large area of the market. Intel created the Classmate as a direct response to OLPC XO-1; to not let competitors create/dominate new large area of the market.

]]> http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html#comment-48820 JimmyJams Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:27:49 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=9791#comment-48820 Intel created the category...yet you accuse them of keeping back innovation. hater. Intel created the category…yet you accuse them of keeping back innovation. hater.

]]> http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html#comment-22621 zima Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:34:10 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=9791#comment-22621 Intel created the Classmate as a direct response to OLPC XO-1; to not let competitors create/dominate new large area of the market. Intel created the Classmate as a direct response to OLPC XO-1; to not let competitors create/dominate new large area of the market.

]]> http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html#comment-22614 JimmyJams Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:27:49 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=9791#comment-22614 Intel created the category...yet you accuse them of keeping back innovation. hater. Intel created the category…yet you accuse them of keeping back innovation. hater.

]]> http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html#comment-22559 LinuxLover Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:59:44 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=9791#comment-22559 Intel and Microsoft are trying to keep netbooks freom cannibalizing more lucrative markets. So, they try to define the market for netbooks instead of letting the market define itself. They're keeping back innovation, pure and simple, because of greed. Intel and Microsoft are trying to keep netbooks freom cannibalizing more lucrative markets. So, they try to define the market for netbooks instead of letting the market define itself. They're keeping back innovation, pure and simple, because of greed.

]]> http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html#comment-22531 Intel Thinks Netbooks Should Cost Less Than $400 | NetbookBoards.com Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:39:16 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=9791#comment-22531 [...] Via Liliputing. [...] [...] Via Liliputing. [...]

]]> http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html#comment-22510 MonkeyKing1969 Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:04:39 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=9791#comment-22510 Well, Intel said $299 when 7" and 8.9" machines were the norm shipping with Linux. With todays 1" machines with XP and fancy parts $400 is okay. Well, Intel said $299 when 7″ and 8.9″ machines were the norm shipping with Linux. With todays 1″ machines with XP and fancy parts $400 is okay.

]]> http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html#comment-22496 Brad_D Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:08:36 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=9791#comment-22496 $400 is an expensive netbook. $400 is an expensive netbook.

]]> http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html#comment-22495 BoloMKXXVIII Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:59:50 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=9791#comment-22495 Of course a lot of this discussion depends on what your definition of a netbook is. Some food for thought here: <br><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/06/netbook-evolution/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/06/netbook-...</a> Of course a lot of this discussion depends on what your definition of a netbook is. Some food for thought here:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/06/netbook-…

]]> http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html#comment-22494 Shawn J. Goff Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:51:47 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=9791#comment-22494 I argue that they should have a base price of $300 or less. I argue that they should have a base price of $300 or less.

]]> http://liliputing.com/2009/06/intel-netbooks-should-cost-400-or-less.html#comment-22485 Mikez Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:12:42 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=9791#comment-22485 Intel also thought I should pay (them) $385 for my 80387/20 - -<br>Back in the day when $100US would buy more than a loaf of bread. Intel also thought I should pay (them) $385 for my 80387/20 – -
Back in the day when $100US would buy more than a loaf of bread.

]]>