<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Packard Bell launches Dot netbooks in the UK (Acer Aspire One clones)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: TrackSmart</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html#comment-48110</link>
		<dc:creator>TrackSmart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8992#comment-48110</guid>
		<description>Aha!  From AMD&#039;s website!  An 8 Watt Sempron processor running at 1000 MHz designed for &quot;ultrathin notebooks&quot;.  Sounds like the processor that Tom&#039;s Hardware tested a year ago.  Why the heck has AMD waited so long to get in the game?!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Processor  	AMD Sempron™ Processor for Ultrathin Notebooks&lt;br&gt;Model 	200U&lt;br&gt;OPN Tray 	SMF200UOAX3DV&lt;br&gt;OPN PIB 	n/a&lt;br&gt;Operating Mode 32 Bit 	Yes&lt;br&gt;Operating Mode 64 Bit 	Yes&lt;br&gt;Frequency (MHz) 	1000&lt;br&gt;System Bus Speed (MHz) 	1600&lt;br&gt;Wattage 	8 W&lt;br&gt;L2 Cache Size 	256&lt;br&gt;Process Technology 	65nm SOI&lt;br&gt;Package/Infrastructure Socket 	ASB1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha!  From AMD&#39;s website!  An 8 Watt Sempron processor running at 1000 MHz designed for &#8220;ultrathin notebooks&#8221;.  Sounds like the processor that Tom&#39;s Hardware tested a year ago.  Why the heck has AMD waited so long to get in the game?!</p>
<p>Processor  	AMD Sempron™ Processor for Ultrathin Notebooks<br />Model 	200U<br />OPN Tray 	SMF200UOAX3DV<br />OPN PIB 	n/a<br />Operating Mode 32 Bit 	Yes<br />Operating Mode 64 Bit 	Yes<br />Frequency (MHz) 	1000<br />System Bus Speed (MHz) 	1600<br />Wattage 	8 W<br />L2 Cache Size 	256<br />Process Technology 	65nm SOI<br />Package/Infrastructure Socket 	ASB1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrackSmart</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html#comment-48112</link>
		<dc:creator>TrackSmart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8992#comment-48112</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t find anything about this new AMD processor.  What are the specs?  Is it just an underclocked Athlon 64?  Will it outperform the atom?  How much power does it use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#39;t find anything about this new AMD processor.  What are the specs?  Is it just an underclocked Athlon 64?  Will it outperform the atom?  How much power does it use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrackSmart</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html#comment-48111</link>
		<dc:creator>TrackSmart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8992#comment-48111</guid>
		<description>And more information!  You have to search for the Sempron 200u.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windowsfordevices.com/c/a/News/AMD-preps-lowpowered-Atom-killer/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS7818796...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Revised, Aug. 25] -- While Intel&#039;s Developer Forum hogged the limelight last week, AMD was shyly preparing to ship its own competitors to Intel&#039;s Atom. The AMD Sempron 200U and 210U will sample next month on a 3.5-inch SBC (single board computer), says Taiwanese manufacturer Ibase.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite its longtime association with power-sipping, low-cost x86 and MIPS-based CPUs, AMD has remained publicly aloof from the &quot;nettop&quot; and netbook fray. However, the blogosphere has been alive for several months with rumors of an AMD processor, reportedly code-named &quot;Bobcat&quot; and also referred to as the &quot;K8 BGA&quot; or Sempron BGA. The CPU was rumored to use AMD&#039;s Sempron core, clocked down to 1.0GHz or 1.5GHz, and offered in a 27mm x 27mm BGA (ball grid array) package for installation in low-cost devices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As it turns out, the rumors were true -- but confirmation comes not from AMD, but from Ibase. The Taiwanese motherboard manufacturer says it has employed the 1.0GHz Sempron 200U and 1.5GHz Sempron 210U on a new SBC, the IB885, which will sample in the next month, and be available in quantity in October.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And more information!  You have to search for the Sempron 200u.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.windowsfordevices.com/c/a/News/AMD-preps-lowpowered-Atom-killer/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS7818796" rel="nofollow">http://www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS7818796</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Revised, Aug. 25] &#8212; While Intel&#39;s Developer Forum hogged the limelight last week, AMD was shyly preparing to ship its own competitors to Intel&#39;s Atom. The AMD Sempron 200U and 210U will sample next month on a 3.5-inch SBC (single board computer), says Taiwanese manufacturer Ibase.</p>
<p>Despite its longtime association with power-sipping, low-cost x86 and MIPS-based CPUs, AMD has remained publicly aloof from the &#8220;nettop&#8221; and netbook fray. However, the blogosphere has been alive for several months with rumors of an AMD processor, reportedly code-named &#8220;Bobcat&#8221; and also referred to as the &#8220;K8 BGA&#8221; or Sempron BGA. The CPU was rumored to use AMD&#39;s Sempron core, clocked down to 1.0GHz or 1.5GHz, and offered in a 27mm x 27mm BGA (ball grid array) package for installation in low-cost devices.</p>
<p>As it turns out, the rumors were true &#8212; but confirmation comes not from AMD, but from Ibase. The Taiwanese motherboard manufacturer says it has employed the 1.0GHz Sempron 200U and 1.5GHz Sempron 210U on a new SBC, the IB885, which will sample in the next month, and be available in quantity in October.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrackSmart</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html#comment-48109</link>
		<dc:creator>TrackSmart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8992#comment-48109</guid>
		<description>I remembered an older Tom&#039;s Hardware article that compared the Atom to an underclocked Athlon 64 &quot;2000+&quot; running at 1000 MHz.  I dug it up again.  The AMD processor had 8 watts TDP, which is pretty low, but higher than Atom.  Maybe that&#039;s what AMD is putting out there as the Athlon 1110?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Athlon-Atom-Nano-power,2036.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Athlon-Atom...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;we received a low-power Athlon 64 2000+ processor for Socket AM2 some months ago, and this processor is rated at a TDP of only 8 W. Although this is not a commercial product (yet), it does a good job of showing what a low-power version of the device would offer for mainstream PC applications.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remembered an older Tom&#39;s Hardware article that compared the Atom to an underclocked Athlon 64 &#8220;2000+&#8221; running at 1000 MHz.  I dug it up again.  The AMD processor had 8 watts TDP, which is pretty low, but higher than Atom.  Maybe that&#39;s what AMD is putting out there as the Athlon 1110?  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Athlon-Atom-Nano-power,2036.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Athlon-Atom" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Athlon-Atom</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;we received a low-power Athlon 64 2000+ processor for Socket AM2 some months ago, and this processor is rated at a TDP of only 8 W. Although this is not a commercial product (yet), it does a good job of showing what a low-power version of the device would offer for mainstream PC applications.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html#comment-48113</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8992#comment-48113</guid>
		<description>Ooh... AMD finally getting in the game!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh&#8230; AMD finally getting in the game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrackSmart</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html#comment-21261</link>
		<dc:creator>TrackSmart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8992#comment-21261</guid>
		<description>Aha!  From AMD&#039;s website!  An 8 Watt Sempron processor running at 1000 MHz designed for &quot;ultrathin notebooks&quot;.  Sounds like the processor that Tom&#039;s Hardware tested a year ago.  Why the heck has AMD waited so long to get in the game?!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Processor  	AMD Sempron™ Processor for Ultrathin Notebooks&lt;br&gt;Model 	200U&lt;br&gt;OPN Tray 	SMF200UOAX3DV&lt;br&gt;OPN PIB 	n/a&lt;br&gt;Operating Mode 32 Bit 	Yes&lt;br&gt;Operating Mode 64 Bit 	Yes&lt;br&gt;Frequency (MHz) 	1000&lt;br&gt;System Bus Speed (MHz) 	1600&lt;br&gt;Wattage 	8 W&lt;br&gt;L2 Cache Size 	256&lt;br&gt;Process Technology 	65nm SOI&lt;br&gt;Package/Infrastructure Socket 	ASB1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha!  From AMD&#39;s website!  An 8 Watt Sempron processor running at 1000 MHz designed for &#8220;ultrathin notebooks&#8221;.  Sounds like the processor that Tom&#39;s Hardware tested a year ago.  Why the heck has AMD waited so long to get in the game?!</p>
<p>Processor  	AMD Sempron™ Processor for Ultrathin Notebooks<br />Model 	200U<br />OPN Tray 	SMF200UOAX3DV<br />OPN PIB 	n/a<br />Operating Mode 32 Bit 	Yes<br />Operating Mode 64 Bit 	Yes<br />Frequency (MHz) 	1000<br />System Bus Speed (MHz) 	1600<br />Wattage 	8 W<br />L2 Cache Size 	256<br />Process Technology 	65nm SOI<br />Package/Infrastructure Socket 	ASB1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrackSmart</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html#comment-21256</link>
		<dc:creator>TrackSmart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8992#comment-21256</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t find anything about this new AMD processor.  What are the specs?  Is it just an underclocked Athlon 64?  Will it outperform the atom?  How much power does it use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#39;t find anything about this new AMD processor.  What are the specs?  Is it just an underclocked Athlon 64?  Will it outperform the atom?  How much power does it use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrackSmart</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html#comment-21262</link>
		<dc:creator>TrackSmart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8992#comment-21262</guid>
		<description>And more information!  You have to search for the Sempron 200u.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windowsfordevices.com/c/a/News/AMD-preps-lowpowered-Atom-killer/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS7818796...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Revised, Aug. 25] -- While Intel&#039;s Developer Forum hogged the limelight last week, AMD was shyly preparing to ship its own competitors to Intel&#039;s Atom. The AMD Sempron 200U and 210U will sample next month on a 3.5-inch SBC (single board computer), says Taiwanese manufacturer Ibase.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite its longtime association with power-sipping, low-cost x86 and MIPS-based CPUs, AMD has remained publicly aloof from the &quot;nettop&quot; and netbook fray. However, the blogosphere has been alive for several months with rumors of an AMD processor, reportedly code-named &quot;Bobcat&quot; and also referred to as the &quot;K8 BGA&quot; or Sempron BGA. The CPU was rumored to use AMD&#039;s Sempron core, clocked down to 1.0GHz or 1.5GHz, and offered in a 27mm x 27mm BGA (ball grid array) package for installation in low-cost devices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As it turns out, the rumors were true -- but confirmation comes not from AMD, but from Ibase. The Taiwanese motherboard manufacturer says it has employed the 1.0GHz Sempron 200U and 1.5GHz Sempron 210U on a new SBC, the IB885, which will sample in the next month, and be available in quantity in October.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And more information!  You have to search for the Sempron 200u.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.windowsfordevices.com/c/a/News/AMD-preps-lowpowered-Atom-killer/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS7818796" rel="nofollow">http://www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS7818796</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Revised, Aug. 25] &#8212; While Intel&#39;s Developer Forum hogged the limelight last week, AMD was shyly preparing to ship its own competitors to Intel&#39;s Atom. The AMD Sempron 200U and 210U will sample next month on a 3.5-inch SBC (single board computer), says Taiwanese manufacturer Ibase.</p>
<p>Despite its longtime association with power-sipping, low-cost x86 and MIPS-based CPUs, AMD has remained publicly aloof from the &#8220;nettop&#8221; and netbook fray. However, the blogosphere has been alive for several months with rumors of an AMD processor, reportedly code-named &#8220;Bobcat&#8221; and also referred to as the &#8220;K8 BGA&#8221; or Sempron BGA. The CPU was rumored to use AMD&#39;s Sempron core, clocked down to 1.0GHz or 1.5GHz, and offered in a 27mm x 27mm BGA (ball grid array) package for installation in low-cost devices.</p>
<p>As it turns out, the rumors were true &#8212; but confirmation comes not from AMD, but from Ibase. The Taiwanese motherboard manufacturer says it has employed the 1.0GHz Sempron 200U and 1.5GHz Sempron 210U on a new SBC, the IB885, which will sample in the next month, and be available in quantity in October.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrackSmart</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html#comment-21258</link>
		<dc:creator>TrackSmart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8992#comment-21258</guid>
		<description>I remembered an older Tom&#039;s Hardware article that compared the Atom to an underclocked Athlon 64 &quot;2000+&quot; running at 1000 MHz.  I dug it up again.  The AMD processor had 8 watts TDP, which is pretty low, but higher than Atom.  Maybe that&#039;s what AMD is putting out there as the Athlon 1110?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Athlon-Atom-Nano-power,2036.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Athlon-Atom...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;we received a low-power Athlon 64 2000+ processor for Socket AM2 some months ago, and this processor is rated at a TDP of only 8 W. Although this is not a commercial product (yet), it does a good job of showing what a low-power version of the device would offer for mainstream PC applications.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remembered an older Tom&#39;s Hardware article that compared the Atom to an underclocked Athlon 64 &#8220;2000+&#8221; running at 1000 MHz.  I dug it up again.  The AMD processor had 8 watts TDP, which is pretty low, but higher than Atom.  Maybe that&#39;s what AMD is putting out there as the Athlon 1110?  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Athlon-Atom-Nano-power,2036.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Athlon-Atom" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Athlon-Atom</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;we received a low-power Athlon 64 2000+ processor for Socket AM2 some months ago, and this processor is rated at a TDP of only 8 W. Although this is not a commercial product (yet), it does a good job of showing what a low-power version of the device would offer for mainstream PC applications.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/packard-bell-launches-dot-netbooks-in-the-uk-acer-aspire-one-clones.html#comment-21249</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8992#comment-21249</guid>
		<description>Ooh... AMD finally getting in the game!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh&#8230; AMD finally getting in the game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

