Comments on: Next gen Intel Atom chips could feature better HD video performance http://liliputing.com/2009/05/next-gen-intel-atom-chips-could-feature-better-hd-video-performance.html Compact Computing Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: TrackSmart http://liliputing.com/2009/05/next-gen-intel-atom-chips-could-feature-better-hd-video-performance.html#comment-47131 TrackSmart Sat, 23 May 2009 06:26:43 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8796#comment-47131 You are not alone. 1080p playback and HDMI ports on a netbook are very low on my priority list. <br><br>I don't see a laptop replacing my desktop computer anytime soon. Desktops still offer the most power and biodegradability for the dollar. A netbook just needs to get me on the internet and open up office documents. You are not alone. 1080p playback and HDMI ports on a netbook are very low on my priority list.

I don't see a laptop replacing my desktop computer anytime soon. Desktops still offer the most power and biodegradability for the dollar. A netbook just needs to get me on the internet and open up office documents.

]]> By: BoloMKXXVIII http://liliputing.com/2009/05/next-gen-intel-atom-chips-could-feature-better-hd-video-performance.html#comment-47130 BoloMKXXVIII Sat, 23 May 2009 02:53:36 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8796#comment-47130 Seems like I am the only person out here that doesn't care about HD on a netbook. My Sammy plays Hulu videos just fine. With 600 vertical lines of resolution on the screen anything more is just a waste. Yes I can hook it up to an external monitor, but I have desktops that can feed large monitors or HDTVs, why use a netbook? Seems like I am the only person out here that doesn't care about HD on a netbook. My Sammy plays Hulu videos just fine. With 600 vertical lines of resolution on the screen anything more is just a waste. Yes I can hook it up to an external monitor, but I have desktops that can feed large monitors or HDTVs, why use a netbook?

]]> By: TrackSmart http://liliputing.com/2009/05/next-gen-intel-atom-chips-could-feature-better-hd-video-performance.html#comment-21017 TrackSmart Sat, 23 May 2009 02:26:43 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8796#comment-21017 You are not alone. 1080p playback and HDMI ports on a netbook are very low on my priority list. <br><br>I don't see a laptop replacing my desktop computer anytime soon. Desktops still offer the most power and biodegradability for the dollar. A netbook just needs to get me on the internet and open up office documents. You are not alone. 1080p playback and HDMI ports on a netbook are very low on my priority list.

I don't see a laptop replacing my desktop computer anytime soon. Desktops still offer the most power and biodegradability for the dollar. A netbook just needs to get me on the internet and open up office documents.

]]> By: BoloMKXXVIII http://liliputing.com/2009/05/next-gen-intel-atom-chips-could-feature-better-hd-video-performance.html#comment-21001 BoloMKXXVIII Fri, 22 May 2009 22:53:36 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8796#comment-21001 Seems like I am the only person out here that doesn't care about HD on a netbook. My Sammy plays Hulu videos just fine. With 600 vertical lines of resolution on the screen anything more is just a waste. Yes I can hook it up to an external monitor, but I have desktops that can feed large monitors or HDTVs, why use a netbook? Seems like I am the only person out here that doesn't care about HD on a netbook. My Sammy plays Hulu videos just fine. With 600 vertical lines of resolution on the screen anything more is just a waste. Yes I can hook it up to an external monitor, but I have desktops that can feed large monitors or HDTVs, why use a netbook?

]]> By: oddone http://liliputing.com/2009/05/next-gen-intel-atom-chips-could-feature-better-hd-video-performance.html#comment-20996 oddone Fri, 22 May 2009 20:29:22 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8796#comment-20996 I've been wondering whether Intel would look into any kind of outside media co-processor chip for a while now. You constantly hear about these little chips put into various pieces of consumer electronics that help them decode 1080 h.264 content, or various other codecs, and I'd wondered if it was even possible to integrate them into a standard netbook. Thankfully it appears you can. <br><br>Of course others are taking matters into their own hands. As you reported yourself, the Aspire 571 is going to have a Quartics QV1721 chip...which according their own site actually claims to accelerate *flash* codecs as well as the standards of H.264, VC-1, and MPEG-2...<br><br>Interesting times to continue to have my infatuation with a netbook/nettop HTPC.... I've been wondering whether Intel would look into any kind of outside media co-processor chip for a while now. You constantly hear about these little chips put into various pieces of consumer electronics that help them decode 1080 h.264 content, or various other codecs, and I'd wondered if it was even possible to integrate them into a standard netbook. Thankfully it appears you can.

Of course others are taking matters into their own hands. As you reported yourself, the Aspire 571 is going to have a Quartics QV1721 chip…which according their own site actually claims to accelerate *flash* codecs as well as the standards of H.264, VC-1, and MPEG-2…

Interesting times to continue to have my infatuation with a netbook/nettop HTPC….

]]> By: MonkeyKing1969 http://liliputing.com/2009/05/next-gen-intel-atom-chips-could-feature-better-hd-video-performance.html#comment-20987 MonkeyKing1969 Fri, 22 May 2009 19:12:34 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8796#comment-20987 Pineview? Pine Trail? Doen't matter because if it doesn't 'bring the goods' it will be called 'what nobody wants' or 'I'd pay $100 more for ION.' Pineview? Pine Trail? Doen't matter because if it doesn't 'bring the goods' it will be called 'what nobody wants' or 'I'd pay $100 more for ION.'

]]> By: okeribok http://liliputing.com/2009/05/next-gen-intel-atom-chips-could-feature-better-hd-video-performance.html#comment-20978 okeribok Fri, 22 May 2009 17:25:55 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8796#comment-20978 It could hardly get any worse... It could hardly get any worse…

]]>