<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel to launch next gen &#8220;Pineview&#8221; Atom processors this year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel will Atom mit Grafik verschmelzen &#171; 11k2</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html#comment-20971</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel will Atom mit Grafik verschmelzen &#171; 11k2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8710#comment-20971</guid>
		<description>[...] zum Vergleich die namensgebende Pinie in der Version von Paul Cezanne. Auch nicht schlecht. (via liliputing, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] zum Vergleich die namensgebende Pinie in der Version von Paul Cezanne. Auch nicht schlecht. (via liliputing, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html#comment-47877</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8710#comment-47877</guid>
		<description>Looks like I&#039;m leaning towards AMD&#039;s Neo platform more and more every day. I&#039;d buy the HP dv2 if it handled streaming video better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully by the end of this year or early next year there will be a dual-core AMD Neo that&#039;ll handle web video better and I&#039;ll finally own a netbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like I&#39;m leaning towards AMD&#39;s Neo platform more and more every day. I&#39;d buy the HP dv2 if it handled streaming video better.</p>
<p>Hopefully by the end of this year or early next year there will be a dual-core AMD Neo that&#39;ll handle web video better and I&#39;ll finally own a netbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html#comment-47878</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8710#comment-47878</guid>
		<description>This looks like a strike against nVidia. I doubt this will allow for much faster speeds since placing the components on the same chip will cause serious thermal issues.  I think if they do this, it will allow AMD an opening in the market, provided they can get their power consumption issues resolved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a strike against nVidia. I doubt this will allow for much faster speeds since placing the components on the same chip will cause serious thermal issues.  I think if they do this, it will allow AMD an opening in the market, provided they can get their power consumption issues resolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html#comment-20878</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8710#comment-20878</guid>
		<description>Looks like I&#039;m leaning towards AMD&#039;s Neo platform more and more every day. I&#039;d buy the HP dv2 if it handled streaming video better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully by the end of this year or early next year there will be a dual-core AMD Neo that&#039;ll handle web video better and I&#039;ll finally own a netbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like I&#39;m leaning towards AMD&#39;s Neo platform more and more every day. I&#39;d buy the HP dv2 if it handled streaming video better.</p>
<p>Hopefully by the end of this year or early next year there will be a dual-core AMD Neo that&#39;ll handle web video better and I&#39;ll finally own a netbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html#comment-20873</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8710#comment-20873</guid>
		<description>This looks like a strike against nVidia. I doubt this will allow for much faster speeds since placing the components on the same chip will cause serious thermal issues.  I think if they do this, it will allow AMD an opening in the market, provided they can get their power consumption issues resolved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a strike against nVidia. I doubt this will allow for much faster speeds since placing the components on the same chip will cause serious thermal issues.  I think if they do this, it will allow AMD an opening in the market, provided they can get their power consumption issues resolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoloMKXXVIII</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html#comment-20862</link>
		<dc:creator>BoloMKXXVIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8710#comment-20862</guid>
		<description>The only things this processor will do is make it more difficult for nVidia and be cheaper to produce for Intel. Both things help their bottom line without providing any benefit to their customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only things this processor will do is make it more difficult for nVidia and be cheaper to produce for Intel. Both things help their bottom line without providing any benefit to their customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benny90</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html#comment-20839</link>
		<dc:creator>benny90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8710#comment-20839</guid>
		<description>Doubt theres a chance for that... There&#039;s a reason these chips can only do so much, and its called MONEY.  When they can get 3-4 times the money for their higher end chips than these they have no desire to make these work much better than they already do.  One thing they can do though is to make them more energy efficient and thats what were seeing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doubt theres a chance for that&#8230; There&#39;s a reason these chips can only do so much, and its called MONEY.  When they can get 3-4 times the money for their higher end chips than these they have no desire to make these work much better than they already do.  One thing they can do though is to make them more energy efficient and thats what were seeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrackSmart</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html#comment-20837</link>
		<dc:creator>TrackSmart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8710#comment-20837</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  I don&#039;t care if it loads up MS Office 4 seconds faster or gives me 10 more minutes of battery life.  What it needs to do is handle streaming video, in all of it&#039;s formats, without stuttering - to give the full internet experience including entertainment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Otherwise, there&#039;s little to get excited about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  I don&#39;t care if it loads up MS Office 4 seconds faster or gives me 10 more minutes of battery life.  What it needs to do is handle streaming video, in all of it&#39;s formats, without stuttering &#8211; to give the full internet experience including entertainment.</p>
<p>Otherwise, there&#39;s little to get excited about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ek4zone</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html#comment-20835</link>
		<dc:creator>ek4zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8710#comment-20835</guid>
		<description>wow, nice information... :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, nice information&#8230; <img src='http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyKing1969</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html#comment-20832</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyKing1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8710#comment-20832</guid>
		<description>This Pineview needs to at least double the graphical throughput to make me care.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It all well and good to have it smaller, cheaper, and cooler; but Intel need boosted graphical performance as well.  Bigger screens with higher resolutions combined with &#039;standard browsing&#039; also needing the ability to handle video on the web, this Pineview need more power to keep Netbooks doing what is their minimum requirement.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Netbooks have to be able to &quot;do&quot; the net from my point of view.  And, now browsing is getting more processor intensive with streaming video &amp; audio demanding far more of even basic systems.  Pineview need to up to the job, and this year is not a moment too soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Pineview needs to at least double the graphical throughput to make me care.  </p>
<p>It all well and good to have it smaller, cheaper, and cooler; but Intel need boosted graphical performance as well.  Bigger screens with higher resolutions combined with &#39;standard browsing&#39; also needing the ability to handle video on the web, this Pineview need more power to keep Netbooks doing what is their minimum requirement.  </p>
<p>Netbooks have to be able to &#8220;do&#8221; the net from my point of view.  And, now browsing is getting more processor intensive with streaming video &#038; audio demanding far more of even basic systems.  Pineview need to up to the job, and this year is not a moment too soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erlik</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/05/intel-to-launch-next-gen-pineview-atom-processors-this-year.html#comment-20830</link>
		<dc:creator>erlik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=8710#comment-20830</guid>
		<description>The problem with flash video is that it doesn&#039;t use the GPU video acceleration, so it consumes a lot of CPU power: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tech-no-media.com/2009/05/there-is-problem-playing-flash-video-on.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tech-no-media.com/2009/05/there-is-p...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope for Intel that Pinneview as enough power to play flash video in full screen, or that adobe adds support for the pinneview GPU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with flash video is that it doesn&#39;t use the GPU video acceleration, so it consumes a lot of CPU power: <a href="http://www.tech-no-media.com/2009/05/there-is-problem-playing-flash-video-on.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.tech-no-media.com/2009/05/there-is-p" rel="nofollow">http://www.tech-no-media.com/2009/05/there-is-p</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>I hope for Intel that Pinneview as enough power to play flash video in full screen, or that adobe adds support for the pinneview GPU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

