<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wait, are Intel Atom CPUs in short supply or is there a surplus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/04/wait-are-intel-atom-cpus-in-short-supply-or-is-there-a-surplus.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/04/wait-are-intel-atom-cpus-in-short-supply-or-is-there-a-surplus.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad_D</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/04/wait-are-intel-atom-cpus-in-short-supply-or-is-there-a-surplus.html#comment-48846</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=7988#comment-48846</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also like to see some success with Via Nano, or even ARM, (since AMD apparently is prejudiced against making any money from netbooks) so those @sshats at Intel know what we think about them arbitrarily refusing to advance the Atom platform and the industry&#039;s (and no doubt Microsoft&#039;s) efforts to convince us we should be paying a $100&#039;s more than the prices we&#039;ve enjoyed the past year for no other reason than to pad their margins.  Its a house of cards and its going to collapse eventually.  Good enough hardware is becoming a cheap commodity, and the software to run it will either be cheap or free -- that&#039;s all there is to it, get used to it Wintel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d also like to see some success with Via Nano, or even ARM, (since AMD apparently is prejudiced against making any money from netbooks) so those @sshats at Intel know what we think about them arbitrarily refusing to advance the Atom platform and the industry&#39;s (and no doubt Microsoft&#39;s) efforts to convince us we should be paying a $100&#39;s more than the prices we&#39;ve enjoyed the past year for no other reason than to pad their margins.  Its a house of cards and its going to collapse eventually.  Good enough hardware is becoming a cheap commodity, and the software to run it will either be cheap or free &#8212; that&#39;s all there is to it, get used to it Wintel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad_D</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/04/wait-are-intel-atom-cpus-in-short-supply-or-is-there-a-surplus.html#comment-19735</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad_D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=7988#comment-19735</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also like to see some success with Via Nano, or even ARM, (since AMD apparently is prejudiced against making any money from netbooks) so those @sshats at Intel know what we think about them arbitrarily refusing to advance the Atom platform and the industry&#039;s (and no doubt Microsoft&#039;s) efforts to convince us we should be paying a $100&#039;s more than the prices we&#039;ve enjoyed the past year for no other reason than to pad their margins.  Its a house of cards and its going to collapse eventually.  Good enough hardware is becoming a cheap commodity, and the software to run it will either be cheap or free -- that&#039;s all there is to it, get used to it Wintel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d also like to see some success with Via Nano, or even ARM, (since AMD apparently is prejudiced against making any money from netbooks) so those @sshats at Intel know what we think about them arbitrarily refusing to advance the Atom platform and the industry&#39;s (and no doubt Microsoft&#39;s) efforts to convince us we should be paying a $100&#39;s more than the prices we&#39;ve enjoyed the past year for no other reason than to pad their margins.  Its a house of cards and its going to collapse eventually.  Good enough hardware is becoming a cheap commodity, and the software to run it will either be cheap or free &#8212; that&#39;s all there is to it, get used to it Wintel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoloMKXXVIII</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/04/wait-are-intel-atom-cpus-in-short-supply-or-is-there-a-surplus.html#comment-19706</link>
		<dc:creator>BoloMKXXVIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=7988#comment-19706</guid>
		<description>I guess if you try to dump most of your inventory into China you end up with a shortage elsewhere. Intel is just doing their best to justify raising prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess if you try to dump most of your inventory into China you end up with a shortage elsewhere. Intel is just doing their best to justify raising prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/04/wait-are-intel-atom-cpus-in-short-supply-or-is-there-a-surplus.html#comment-19705</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=7988#comment-19705</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused too. I just read about a surplus of Atoms on Engadget &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/28/demand-for-intels-atom-cpus-finally-beginning-to-cool-off/#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/28/demand-for-i...&lt;/a&gt; and came here to comment again on yesterday&#039;s story about a shortage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope Via&#039;s Nano proves to be a strong competitor to the Atom. Then Intel can take their limitations they&#039;re trying to dictate to netbook makers on how the chip can be used, and shove it up their ***.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m confused too. I just read about a surplus of Atoms on Engadget <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/28/demand-for-intels-atom-cpus-finally-beginning-to-cool-off/#comments" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/28/demand-for-i" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/28/demand-for-i</a>&#8230; and came here to comment again on yesterday&#39;s story about a shortage.</p>
<p>I hope Via&#39;s Nano proves to be a strong competitor to the Atom. Then Intel can take their limitations they&#39;re trying to dictate to netbook makers on how the chip can be used, and shove it up their ***.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

