<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Atom v2 (Pineview) coming this year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/01/intel-atom-v2-pineview-coming-this-year.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/intel-atom-v2-pineview-coming-this-year.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 08:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanfoot</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/intel-atom-v2-pineview-coming-this-year.html#comment-47379</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4910#comment-47379</guid>
		<description>This shows the Pineview as a successor to the Atom 230 &amp; 330 processors.  Which Intel has targeted at nettops rather than netbooks because of their higher power utilization.  The 330 for example uses almost 8W, while the N270 only uses about 2.5W TDP.  So are these new Pineview chips targeted at netbooks or not?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One obvious fallout of integrating the graphics on the same chip as the CPU is that external graphics like the Nvidia ION platform will make less sense, which might of course be part of what Intel is thinking.  If these things can do 1080p video decoding with reasonable CPU load, and can handle some of the external display options like HDMI or DVI that the current models can&#039;t, they might kill Ion before it ships...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This shows the Pineview as a successor to the Atom 230 &#038; 330 processors.  Which Intel has targeted at nettops rather than netbooks because of their higher power utilization.  The 330 for example uses almost 8W, while the N270 only uses about 2.5W TDP.  So are these new Pineview chips targeted at netbooks or not?</p>
<p>One obvious fallout of integrating the graphics on the same chip as the CPU is that external graphics like the Nvidia ION platform will make less sense, which might of course be part of what Intel is thinking.  If these things can do 1080p video decoding with reasonable CPU load, and can handle some of the external display options like HDMI or DVI that the current models can&#39;t, they might kill Ion before it ships&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanfoot</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/intel-atom-v2-pineview-coming-this-year.html#comment-14516</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4910#comment-14516</guid>
		<description>This shows the Pineview as a successor to the Atom 230 &amp; 330 processors.  Which Intel has targeted at nettops rather than netbooks because of their higher power utilization.  The 330 for example uses almost 8W, while the N270 only uses about 2.5W TDP.  So are these new Pineview chips targeted at netbooks or not?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One obvious fallout of integrating the graphics on the same chip as the CPU is that external graphics like the Nvidia ION platform will make less sense, which might of course be part of what Intel is thinking.  If these things can do 1080p video decoding with reasonable CPU load, and can handle some of the external display options like HDMI or DVI that the current models can&#039;t, they might kill Ion before it ships...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This shows the Pineview as a successor to the Atom 230 &#038; 330 processors.  Which Intel has targeted at nettops rather than netbooks because of their higher power utilization.  The 330 for example uses almost 8W, while the N270 only uses about 2.5W TDP.  So are these new Pineview chips targeted at netbooks or not?</p>
<p>One obvious fallout of integrating the graphics on the same chip as the CPU is that external graphics like the Nvidia ION platform will make less sense, which might of course be part of what Intel is thinking.  If these things can do 1080p video decoding with reasonable CPU load, and can handle some of the external display options like HDMI or DVI that the current models can&#39;t, they might kill Ion before it ships&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Sims</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/intel-atom-v2-pineview-coming-this-year.html#comment-14219</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Sims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4910#comment-14219</guid>
		<description>This sounds like an update of the chip using their tick-tock method, basically the same chip but moved over to the new manufacturing process.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But looks good and I guess it will consume less power.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like an update of the chip using their tick-tock method, basically the same chip but moved over to the new manufacturing process.</p>
<p>But looks good and I guess it will consume less power.</p>
<p>Gary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/intel-atom-v2-pineview-coming-this-year.html#comment-14203</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4910#comment-14203</guid>
		<description>The best article I&#039;ve read on lilputing this month! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not going to get Samsung NC10 anymore. I&#039;d rather wait for this CPU to be implemented for potentially 10 hour battery life. What Intel should do is allow you to change CPUs in order to upgrade your netbook. Why should old CPUs in a netbook force you to buy a whole new computer just to get a new netbook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best article I&#39;ve read on lilputing this month! </p>
<p>I&#39;m not going to get Samsung NC10 anymore. I&#39;d rather wait for this CPU to be implemented for potentially 10 hour battery life. What Intel should do is allow you to change CPUs in order to upgrade your netbook. Why should old CPUs in a netbook force you to buy a whole new computer just to get a new netbook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/intel-atom-v2-pineview-coming-this-year.html#comment-14177</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4910#comment-14177</guid>
		<description>If that&#039;s 7W TDP including the graphics etc, this should be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#39;s 7W TDP including the graphics etc, this should be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous coward</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/intel-atom-v2-pineview-coming-this-year.html#comment-14176</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4910#comment-14176</guid>
		<description>hope it&#039;s powerful enough to play 1080p mkv&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hope it&#39;s powerful enough to play 1080p mkv&#39;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Ochs</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/intel-atom-v2-pineview-coming-this-year.html#comment-14174</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Ochs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4910#comment-14174</guid>
		<description>Sounds good - until you see this is a successor to Diamondville, not Silverthorne. Meaning it&#039;s for small desktops, not netbooks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good &#8211; until you see this is a successor to Diamondville, not Silverthorne. Meaning it&#39;s for small desktops, not netbooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoloMKXXVIII</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/intel-atom-v2-pineview-coming-this-year.html#comment-14173</link>
		<dc:creator>BoloMKXXVIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4910#comment-14173</guid>
		<description>Sounds like good but modest changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like good but modest changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

