<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freescale-powered netbooks could hit $200 this year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2009/01/freescale-powered-netbooks-could-hit-200-this-year.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/freescale-powered-netbooks-could-hit-200-this-year.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dual Sim Mobile Phones</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/freescale-powered-netbooks-could-hit-200-this-year.html#comment-27757</link>
		<dc:creator>Dual Sim Mobile Phones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4268#comment-27757</guid>
		<description>great post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dual Sim mobile phones</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/freescale-powered-netbooks-could-hit-200-this-year.html#comment-69959</link>
		<dc:creator>Dual Sim mobile phones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4268#comment-69959</guid>
		<description>great post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Style by Shez</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/freescale-powered-netbooks-could-hit-200-this-year.html#comment-14778</link>
		<dc:creator>Style by Shez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4268#comment-14778</guid>
		<description>Nice to know the netbooks will come in even prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to know the netbooks will come in even prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicfer</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/freescale-powered-netbooks-could-hit-200-this-year.html#comment-13323</link>
		<dc:creator>nicfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4268#comment-13323</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t also Windows Mobile work on such devices? Sure, it&#039;ll suck since it&#039;s not designed for 9&quot; screens but until M$ decides to port win7 to the ARM architecture, that would be a hackish alternative, and even less legal than putting Mac OSX in x86 devices. Or what about Symbian? Dunno if they are interesed in &#039;netbooks&#039;. But until now, the better option would be ARM Linux distros, like Debian&#039;s version for that architecture or Ubuntu&#039;s one. Here is where free software becomes more reliable, a small change in hardware can result in too many changes on software, where free operating systems could implement it and publish the changes quickly, while propietary OSes modifications are locked at the vendor&#039;s decission. That&#039;s why I like free software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#39;t also Windows Mobile work on such devices? Sure, it&#39;ll suck since it&#39;s not designed for 9&#8243; screens but until M$ decides to port win7 to the ARM architecture, that would be a hackish alternative, and even less legal than putting Mac OSX in x86 devices. Or what about Symbian? Dunno if they are interesed in &#39;netbooks&#39;. But until now, the better option would be ARM Linux distros, like Debian&#39;s version for that architecture or Ubuntu&#39;s one. Here is where free software becomes more reliable, a small change in hardware can result in too many changes on software, where free operating systems could implement it and publish the changes quickly, while propietary OSes modifications are locked at the vendor&#39;s decission. That&#39;s why I like free software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/freescale-powered-netbooks-could-hit-200-this-year.html#comment-13105</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4268#comment-13105</guid>
		<description>Freescale eh? Will it also fail on the leap year like the Zunes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freescale eh? Will it also fail on the leap year like the Zunes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Linder</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/freescale-powered-netbooks-could-hit-200-this-year.html#comment-70234</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4268#comment-70234</guid>
		<description>Whoops, you&#039;re completely right about the first point. I&#039;ll update the
post on that front. I blame this oversight on the fact that I&#039;m still
getting over a cold that hit me pretty hard this weekend.

As for the more likely to return bit -- I&#039;m trying not to make any
real value judgements on this one. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if it&#039;s
true, but I do concede that the stats we&#039;ve seen so far have been
gathered in a somewhat less than scientific method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, you&#8217;re completely right about the first point. I&#8217;ll update the<br />
post on that front. I blame this oversight on the fact that I&#8217;m still<br />
getting over a cold that hit me pretty hard this weekend.</p>
<p>As for the more likely to return bit &#8212; I&#8217;m trying not to make any<br />
real value judgements on this one. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it&#8217;s<br />
true, but I do concede that the stats we&#8217;ve seen so far have been<br />
gathered in a somewhat less than scientific method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Morris</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/freescale-powered-netbooks-could-hit-200-this-year.html#comment-13057</link>
		<dc:creator>John Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4268#comment-13057</guid>
		<description>Could ya stop repeating that FUD about the higher return rate?  ASUS reports no difference in return rates.  Their Linux install works.  That is the lesson here, ship a machine with a load of SUSE that doesn&#039;t even support the webcam and yea, people will be bringing them back, get the preload right and they won&#039;t.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So if these ARM machines have a good working load, reasonable build quality and a really low price they should move nicely, especially in the current economic climate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could ya stop repeating that FUD about the higher return rate?  ASUS reports no difference in return rates.  Their Linux install works.  That is the lesson here, ship a machine with a load of SUSE that doesn&#39;t even support the webcam and yea, people will be bringing them back, get the preload right and they won&#39;t.</p>
<p>So if these ARM machines have a good working load, reasonable build quality and a really low price they should move nicely, especially in the current economic climate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoloMKXXVIII</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/freescale-powered-netbooks-could-hit-200-this-year.html#comment-13056</link>
		<dc:creator>BoloMKXXVIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4268#comment-13056</guid>
		<description>Brad, I take issue with a couple of your points. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. &quot;will likely be limited to running Linux.&quot; We have seen Windows CE based netbooks already and heard rumors of Android netbooks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. &quot; more likely to return computers running Linux&quot; Xandros and Linpus are not top tier distros and they were not implemented well for netbooks. Suse is a top tier distro but it wasn&#039;t implemented well either.  If we get something like Ubuntu netbook remix installed by an OEM and all the hardware/software works properly I think the return numbers will drop considerably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, I take issue with a couple of your points. </p>
<p>1. &#8220;will likely be limited to running Linux.&#8221; We have seen Windows CE based netbooks already and heard rumors of Android netbooks. </p>
<p>2. &#8221; more likely to return computers running Linux&#8221; Xandros and Linpus are not top tier distros and they were not implemented well for netbooks. Suse is a top tier distro but it wasn&#39;t implemented well either.  If we get something like Ubuntu netbook remix installed by an OEM and all the hardware/software works properly I think the return numbers will drop considerably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikez</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2009/01/freescale-powered-netbooks-could-hit-200-this-year.html#comment-13054</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4268#comment-13054</guid>
		<description>We might be able to say that in 2009 (2010...?): &quot;Price Tag Rules&quot;&lt;br&gt;A sorry thing to hear on a tech-oriented site. ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My reasoning:&lt;br&gt;In a serious, economic down-turn; &lt;br&gt;Furniture, Clothing and Consumer Electronics take some of the biggest hits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The &quot;Convenience Netbook&quot; thread is still accumulating a respectable&lt;br&gt;number of views - So maybe 2009 is the year of the &quot;Cheap and Useful&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We might be able to say that in 2009 (2010&#8230;?): &#8220;Price Tag Rules&#8221;<br />A sorry thing to hear on a tech-oriented site. <img src='http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My reasoning:<br />In a serious, economic down-turn; <br />Furniture, Clothing and Consumer Electronics take some of the biggest hits.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Convenience Netbook&#8221; thread is still accumulating a respectable<br />number of views &#8211; So maybe 2009 is the year of the &#8220;Cheap and Useful&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

