<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New MSI U115 features &#8220;hybrid storage&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2008/12/new-msi-u115-features-hybrid-storage.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/new-msi-u115-features-hybrid-storage.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyKing1969</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/new-msi-u115-features-hybrid-storage.html#comment-47723</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyKing1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4113#comment-47723</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see the cost comparison between one medium sized SSD and having on SSD and one HDD?  I mean, why not put the cost of shoving a HDD in the chasse towards a bigger SSD in the 60 to 80 GB range, yes you have to take the HDDs part cost and add another &quot;US Grant&quot; on top of it to come close to the cost of a bigger SSD...but of you did have that bigger SSD you have none of the down side of a HDD in there at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having that HDD in there adds weight. Not a little weight either, and HDD adds nearly 12-14 oz more weight.   It adds battery drain while it in operation.  It adds complexity to how things are saved.  And as I said above that HDD comes with a price tag which might be better put towards having a bigger SSD.  Also now the computer case needs to be bigger to hold two drives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, this seems like an option destine to have a six month lifespan.  In six to eight months from now you might see SSD price dip enough to make having this duel style set up tip towards unnecessary.&lt;br&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d love to see the cost comparison between one medium sized SSD and having on SSD and one HDD?  I mean, why not put the cost of shoving a HDD in the chasse towards a bigger SSD in the 60 to 80 GB range, yes you have to take the HDDs part cost and add another &#8220;US Grant&#8221; on top of it to come close to the cost of a bigger SSD&#8230;but of you did have that bigger SSD you have none of the down side of a HDD in there at all.</p>
<p>Having that HDD in there adds weight. Not a little weight either, and HDD adds nearly 12-14 oz more weight.   It adds battery drain while it in operation.  It adds complexity to how things are saved.  And as I said above that HDD comes with a price tag which might be better put towards having a bigger SSD.  Also now the computer case needs to be bigger to hold two drives.</p>
<p>Also, this seems like an option destine to have a six month lifespan.  In six to eight months from now you might see SSD price dip enough to make having this duel style set up tip towards unnecessary.<br />.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linc (MonkeyKing)</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/new-msi-u115-features-hybrid-storage.html#comment-12638</link>
		<dc:creator>Linc (MonkeyKing)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=4113#comment-12638</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see the cost comparison between one medium sized SSD and having on SSD and one HDD?  I mean, why not put the cost of shoving a HDD in the chasse towards a bigger SSD in the 60 to 80 GB range, yes you have to take the HDDs part cost and add another &quot;US Grant&quot; on top of it to come close to the cost of a bigger SSD...but of you did have that bigger SSD you have none of the down side of a HDD in there at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having that HDD in there adds weight. Not a little weight either, and HDD adds nearly 12-14 oz more weight.   It adds battery drain while it in operation.  It adds complexity to how things are saved.  And as I said above that HDD comes with a price tag which might be better put towards having a bigger SSD.  Also now the computer case needs to be bigger to hold two drives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, this seems like an option destine to have a six month lifespan.  In six to eight months from now you might see SSD price dip enough to make having this duel style set up tip towards unnecessary.&lt;br&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d love to see the cost comparison between one medium sized SSD and having on SSD and one HDD?  I mean, why not put the cost of shoving a HDD in the chasse towards a bigger SSD in the 60 to 80 GB range, yes you have to take the HDDs part cost and add another &#8220;US Grant&#8221; on top of it to come close to the cost of a bigger SSD&#8230;but of you did have that bigger SSD you have none of the down side of a HDD in there at all.</p>
<p>Having that HDD in there adds weight. Not a little weight either, and HDD adds nearly 12-14 oz more weight.   It adds battery drain while it in operation.  It adds complexity to how things are saved.  And as I said above that HDD comes with a price tag which might be better put towards having a bigger SSD.  Also now the computer case needs to be bigger to hold two drives.</p>
<p>Also, this seems like an option destine to have a six month lifespan.  In six to eight months from now you might see SSD price dip enough to make having this duel style set up tip towards unnecessary.<br />.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

