<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coby to intro sub-$100 &#8220;Midget PC&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Netbook Hype: Dell Adamo to be &#8220;World&#8217;s Thinnest Laptop,&#8221; Rumors of an Apple Netbook &#171; Sixteen eighty-three:</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-11872</link>
		<dc:creator>Netbook Hype: Dell Adamo to be &#8220;World&#8217;s Thinnest Laptop,&#8221; Rumors of an Apple Netbook &#171; Sixteen eighty-three:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-11872</guid>
		<description>[...] Coby to intro sub-$100 &#8220;Midget PC&#8221; - An even lower end netbook? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Coby to intro sub-$100 &#8220;Midget PC&#8221; &#8211; An even lower end netbook? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midget book-ul de la Coby&#8230;o stire tip hoax? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10996</link>
		<dc:creator>Midget book-ul de la Coby&#8230;o stire tip hoax? &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 00:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10996</guid>
		<description>[...] cum spun cei de la Liliputing nu este un producator care este recunoscut pentru calitatea produselor sale, dar este un producator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cum spun cei de la Liliputing nu este un producator care este recunoscut pentru calitatea produselor sale, dar este un producator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikez</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-45822</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-45822</guid>
		<description>Just to let a bit of reality leak in here and give some links for thought &lt;br&gt;about the &lt;$200 devices . . .&lt;br&gt;This little puppy is alive and well (based on a 600Mhz ARM device made by TI):&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://beagleboard.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://beagleboard.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Send these people money and they will ship you one, same day in my case:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=296-23428-ND&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most certainly not a wet dream, details on the processor line here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=XOMAP3525BCBB-ND&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;And it runs one of the major (in the embedded world) Linux distributions:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;- - - -&lt;br&gt;As to the Razorbook (A.K.A. many other names) - an Exon PC701-LX - -&lt;br&gt;Its follow-up machine, the PC703-LX, is (according to Exon) shipping now -&lt;br&gt;with a suggested retail price of $205-$215.&lt;br&gt;- - - -&lt;br&gt;And there is a site-local thread, started on the PC703-LX, but turning general:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://liliputing.com/2009/05/forums-down-for-maintenance.html?topic=219.0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.liliputing.com/forums/index.php?topi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;On supporting non-Intel processor Convenience Netbooks (cheap-o&#039;s).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;some people are indeed already headed for the &quot;blister packed on a card&quot;&lt;br&gt;computer market - even if we have to create it ourselves. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let a bit of reality leak in here and give some links for thought <br />about the &lt;$200 devices . . .<br />This little puppy is alive and well (based on a 600Mhz ARM device made by TI):<br /><a href="http://beagleboard.org/" rel="nofollow">http://beagleboard.org/</a><br />Send these people money and they will ship you one, same day in my case:<br /><a href="http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=296-23428-ND" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu" rel="nofollow">http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu</a>&#8230;<br />Most certainly not a wet dream, details on the processor line here:<br /><a href="http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=XOMAP3525BCBB-ND" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu" rel="nofollow">http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu</a>&#8230;<br />And it runs one of the major (in the embedded world) Linux distributions:<br /><a href="http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/</a><br />- &#8211; - -<br />As to the Razorbook (A.K.A. many other names) &#8211; an Exon PC701-LX &#8211; -<br />Its follow-up machine, the PC703-LX, is (according to Exon) shipping now -<br />with a suggested retail price of $205-$215.<br />- &#8211; - -<br />And there is a site-local thread, started on the PC703-LX, but turning general:<br /><a href="http://liliputing.com/2009/05/forums-down-for-maintenance.html?topic=219.0" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.liliputing.com/forums/index.php?topi" rel="nofollow">http://www.liliputing.com/forums/index.php?topi</a>&#8230;<br />On supporting non-Intel processor Convenience Netbooks (cheap-o&#39;s).</p>
<p>some people are indeed already headed for the &#8220;blister packed on a card&#8221;<br />computer market &#8211; even if we have to create it ourselves. <img src='http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikez</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10977</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10977</guid>
		<description>Just to let a bit of reality leak in here and give some links for thought &lt;br&gt;about the &lt;$200 devices . . .&lt;br&gt;This little puppy is alive and well (based on a 600Mhz ARM device made by TI):&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://beagleboard.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://beagleboard.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Send these people money and they will ship you one, same day in my case:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=296-23428-ND&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most certainly not a wet dream, details on the processor line here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=XOMAP3525BCBB-ND&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;And it runs one of the major (in the embedded world) Linux distributions:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;- - - -&lt;br&gt;As to the Razorbook (A.K.A. many other names) - an Exon PC701-LX - -&lt;br&gt;Its follow-up machine, the PC703-LX, is (according to Exon) shipping now -&lt;br&gt;with a suggested retail price of $205-$215.&lt;br&gt;- - - -&lt;br&gt;And there is a site-local thread, started on the PC703-LX, but turning general:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://liliputing.com/2009/05/forums-down-for-maintenance.html?topic=219.0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.liliputing.com/forums/index.php?topi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;On supporting non-Intel processor Convenience Netbooks (cheap-o&#039;s).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;some people are indeed already headed for the &quot;blister packed on a card&quot;&lt;br&gt;computer market - even if we have to create it ourselves. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let a bit of reality leak in here and give some links for thought <br />about the &lt;$200 devices . . .<br />This little puppy is alive and well (based on a 600Mhz ARM device made by TI):<br /><a href="http://beagleboard.org/" rel="nofollow">http://beagleboard.org/</a><br />Send these people money and they will ship you one, same day in my case:<br /><a href="http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=296-23428-ND" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu" rel="nofollow">http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu</a>&#8230;<br />Most certainly not a wet dream, details on the processor line here:<br /><a href="http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=XOMAP3525BCBB-ND" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu" rel="nofollow">http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksu</a>&#8230;<br />And it runs one of the major (in the embedded world) Linux distributions:<br /><a href="http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/</a><br />- &#8211; - -<br />As to the Razorbook (A.K.A. many other names) &#8211; an Exon PC701-LX &#8211; -<br />Its follow-up machine, the PC703-LX, is (according to Exon) shipping now -<br />with a suggested retail price of $205-$215.<br />- &#8211; - -<br />And there is a site-local thread, started on the PC703-LX, but turning general:<br /><a href="http://liliputing.com/2009/05/forums-down-for-maintenance.html?topic=219.0" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.liliputing.com/forums/index.php?topi" rel="nofollow">http://www.liliputing.com/forums/index.php?topi</a>&#8230;<br />On supporting non-Intel processor Convenience Netbooks (cheap-o&#39;s).</p>
<p>some people are indeed already headed for the &#8220;blister packed on a card&#8221;<br />computer market &#8211; even if we have to create it ourselves. <img src='http://liliputing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Norris</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10949</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10949</guid>
		<description>Oh, well. It&#039;s a shame it wasn&#039;t real.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still think someone with a really efficient supply chain and mass-market experience could put together a Razorbook-class machine for well under $200.The Razorbook cuts back on many of the components, but nearly costs as much as the 7&quot; Eee 4G Surf does now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Royal can put touchscreen PDA knockoffs on shelves for under $30, a cut-spec sub-netbook with an off-brand CPU and a Damn Small Linux-grade OS loaded ought to be doable in the $100-150 range. And I&#039;d totally buy one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;bolomkxxviii, I feel your pain, but most people know that just because they can buy a cheap handheld game system for $49 that totally sucks, it doesn&#039;t mean that a DS will also suck. I think the same rule applies here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, well. It&#39;s a shame it wasn&#39;t real.</p>
<p>I still think someone with a really efficient supply chain and mass-market experience could put together a Razorbook-class machine for well under $200.The Razorbook cuts back on many of the components, but nearly costs as much as the 7&#8243; Eee 4G Surf does now.</p>
<p>If Royal can put touchscreen PDA knockoffs on shelves for under $30, a cut-spec sub-netbook with an off-brand CPU and a Damn Small Linux-grade OS loaded ought to be doable in the $100-150 range. And I&#39;d totally buy one.</p>
<p>bolomkxxviii, I feel your pain, but most people know that just because they can buy a cheap handheld game system for $49 that totally sucks, it doesn&#39;t mean that a DS will also suck. I think the same rule applies here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven522</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10926</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven522</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10926</guid>
		<description>Same here.  I want a &quot;keychain&quot; PC that is about as powerful as an old 286 that would allow me to load all of my old DOS games onto it and carry it around in my poket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here.  I want a &#8220;keychain&#8221; PC that is about as powerful as an old 286 that would allow me to load all of my old DOS games onto it and carry it around in my poket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bolomkxxviii</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10923</link>
		<dc:creator>bolomkxxviii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10923</guid>
		<description>I actually think something like this would hurt the netbook market. Many people would buy one because it is cheap, but when they find out they can&#039;t load any programs they already own and doesn&#039;t have many features they expect in a more expensive laptop they will bad-mouth all netbooks to anyone and everyone they know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think something like this would hurt the netbook market. Many people would buy one because it is cheap, but when they find out they can&#39;t load any programs they already own and doesn&#39;t have many features they expect in a more expensive laptop they will bad-mouth all netbooks to anyone and everyone they know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linc</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10914</link>
		<dc:creator>Linc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10914</guid>
		<description>Too bad....I would have been very interested to see what Coby could have made.  I hope someday we will see one of these small electronics companies make a Netbook....I want a Netbook in a thermoformed pack on a hook in a drug store for $99.  I want a Netbook you could get out of a vending machine....god knows why...but I want it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad&#8230;.I would have been very interested to see what Coby could have made.  I hope someday we will see one of these small electronics companies make a Netbook&#8230;.I want a Netbook in a thermoformed pack on a hook in a drug store for $99.  I want a Netbook you could get out of a vending machine&#8230;.god knows why&#8230;but I want it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven522</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10896</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven522</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10896</guid>
		<description>It seems this was a hoax.  I&#039;ve read several reports that the &quot;official&quot; word from Coby is that it was not their press release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems this was a hoax.  I&#39;ve read several reports that the &#8220;official&#8221; word from Coby is that it was not their press release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linc (Monkey-King)</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10895</link>
		<dc:creator>Linc (Monkey-King)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10895</guid>
		<description>True or not, I think it would be a good move for Coby or Craig to make Netbooks.  Both brands sell in Wal*Marts, drug stores, etc.   These companies make devices with screens, DVD drives, USB ports, onboard memory, and about 80% of the parts you would have in a Netbook.   True, they would need a far more product support for a computer, but that wouldn&#039;t even be such thing.  If Coby and Craig had product support set up they coudl support their MP3, DVD, Picture frames, and radios better as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From a marketing point of view, Coby is actually a better known BRAND to average consumers then Asus, MSi, or any of the other dozen Hong Kong/Taiwan companies putting out Netbooks.  Coby and Craig are known as cheap brands, but they are known to Middle America.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The interesting part is Coby wouldn’t even have to hit the $99.99 mark to do well.  Even at $175 -$200 they could get some traction in the market place.  I would even say Coby doing this could do a great deal to “save” Netbooks.  It is troubling to see that the prices are heading into the $500 range as more companies add to the Netbook market.  Coby making a $99 or $200 machine could be seen as a helpful “corrective” influence on the prices of the Netbooks inching towards $700.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True or not, I think it would be a good move for Coby or Craig to make Netbooks.  Both brands sell in Wal*Marts, drug stores, etc.   These companies make devices with screens, DVD drives, USB ports, onboard memory, and about 80% of the parts you would have in a Netbook.   True, they would need a far more product support for a computer, but that wouldn&#39;t even be such thing.  If Coby and Craig had product support set up they coudl support their MP3, DVD, Picture frames, and radios better as well.</p>
<p>From a marketing point of view, Coby is actually a better known BRAND to average consumers then Asus, MSi, or any of the other dozen Hong Kong/Taiwan companies putting out Netbooks.  Coby and Craig are known as cheap brands, but they are known to Middle America.  </p>
<p>The interesting part is Coby wouldn’t even have to hit the $99.99 mark to do well.  Even at $175 -$200 they could get some traction in the market place.  I would even say Coby doing this could do a great deal to “save” Netbooks.  It is troubling to see that the prices are heading into the $500 range as more companies add to the Netbook market.  Coby making a $99 or $200 machine could be seen as a helpful “corrective” influence on the prices of the Netbooks inching towards $700.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Morris</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10891</link>
		<dc:creator>John Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10891</guid>
		<description>I was stoked when first reading this piece yesterday.  Now I&#039;m smelling something ill from this whole thing that says hoax.  Lets wait to see if any reputable news service or wire picks this up before we get all excited, K?  Even a press release on Coby&#039;s own site would make it real.  Until then it is just a rumor on a dodgy website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was stoked when first reading this piece yesterday.  Now I&#39;m smelling something ill from this whole thing that says hoax.  Lets wait to see if any reputable news service or wire picks this up before we get all excited, K?  Even a press release on Coby&#39;s own site would make it real.  Until then it is just a rumor on a dodgy website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Norris</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10884</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10884</guid>
		<description>One more interesting tidbit, from Wikipedia -- there are multiple Linux ports in progress:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These computers primarily run the Linux operating system, however users have managed to port other operating systems such as Windows CE to the Loongson architecture.&lt;br&gt;Linux distributions that work on Loongson:&lt;br&gt;Debian Linux, specifically their mipsel port&lt;br&gt;Gentoo Linux, work in progress&lt;br&gt;Slackware Linux is also being ported, although nothing has been released yet.&lt;br&gt;Red Flag Linux&lt;br&gt;Mandriva, since September 2007</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more interesting tidbit, from Wikipedia &#8212; there are multiple Linux ports in progress:</p>
<p>These computers primarily run the Linux operating system, however users have managed to port other operating systems such as Windows CE to the Loongson architecture.<br />Linux distributions that work on Loongson:<br />Debian Linux, specifically their mipsel port<br />Gentoo Linux, work in progress<br />Slackware Linux is also being ported, although nothing has been released yet.<br />Red Flag Linux<br />Mandriva, since September 2007</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Norris</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10883</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10883</guid>
		<description>Interesting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loongson&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loongson&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;From Wikipedia:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first revision of the Loongson architecture, the Loongson1 is a pure 32-bit CPU running at a clock speed of 266 MHz. Its primary focus is with embedded designs such as cash registers, where 64-bit capability and high speed are not necessary. It was released in 2002. As of 2006 it was used in the Sinomanic Tianhua GX-1C PC.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In March 2006, a €100 Godson II computer design called Longmeng (Dragon Dream) was announced.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In June 2006 at Computex&#039;2006, Taipei YellowSheepRiver company has announced a Municator YSR-639, a mini-computer based on the 400 MHz Godson 2.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In September 2006, Li Guojie, director of the Institute of Computer Technology under the CAS announced a Longxin IIE (Godson IIE), a 64-bit chip containing 47 million transistors and reaching speeds of 1 GHz. It implements a subset of the MIPS III ISA.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;In the second half of the third quarter of 2006, China revealed the latest addition to the Godson series, the Godson 2E, which was already in the early stages of manufacturing. Developers claim tests show that the Chinese chip can rival Intel Pentium 4 processor in performance and it was superior to the early series of the Pentium 4 CPUs, with much lower production costs.[5]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unlike processors from Intel, Advanced Micro Devices or Via Technologies, the Godson-2E is not based on the x86 instruction set. Instead, the chip uses a modified version of the MIPS instruction set that replaces proprietary instructions with ones developed by ICT. This means the Godson 2E cannot be used in PCs running Microsoft&#039;s Windows XP operating system, and thus the computing devices based on the Godson 2E would be most likely running the Linux operating system.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The processor runs at a clock speed of 1 GHz and like other chips in the Godson family, the Godson 2E was designed by the Chinese Academy of Science&#039;s Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) and was the first Chinese CPU produced using 90-nanometer process technology. Earlier versions of the Godson 2 chip were produced using a 180-nanometer process and ran at clock speeds up to 500 MHz. The Godson 2E CPU contains 47 million transistors, more than the 42 million of the original Pentium 4. Battery drain will be less, with power consumption between 3 to 8 watts, according to CAE Fellow Li Guojie (李国杰), director of the ICT. Li Guojie also announced that at the end of 2006, scientists would start to upgrade Godson 2E to Godson 2F, which will improve performance by about 30% and reduces power consumption by about 50%. It was announced that the Godson-3 is scheduled to enter production by 2008.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In January 2007 Gentoo Linux was ported on this machine, the initial port was compiled on a Cobalt Qube micro-server.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to the table on Wikipedia, there are parts ranging down to 200 MHz, but a part that starts at 400 MHz was used in a 100 Euro computer 2 1/2  years ago, and there have been Linux ports. Hopefully the specs will be in the ballpark of the Razorbook, though Nate was right to point out that even that is still speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loongson" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loongson</a><br />From Wikipedia:</p>
<p>The first revision of the Loongson architecture, the Loongson1 is a pure 32-bit CPU running at a clock speed of 266 MHz. Its primary focus is with embedded designs such as cash registers, where 64-bit capability and high speed are not necessary. It was released in 2002. As of 2006 it was used in the Sinomanic Tianhua GX-1C PC.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>In March 2006, a €100 Godson II computer design called Longmeng (Dragon Dream) was announced.</p>
<p>In June 2006 at Computex&#39;2006, Taipei YellowSheepRiver company has announced a Municator YSR-639, a mini-computer based on the 400 MHz Godson 2.</p>
<p>In September 2006, Li Guojie, director of the Institute of Computer Technology under the CAS announced a Longxin IIE (Godson IIE), a 64-bit chip containing 47 million transistors and reaching speeds of 1 GHz. It implements a subset of the MIPS III ISA.</p>
<p>In the second half of the third quarter of 2006, China revealed the latest addition to the Godson series, the Godson 2E, which was already in the early stages of manufacturing. Developers claim tests show that the Chinese chip can rival Intel Pentium 4 processor in performance and it was superior to the early series of the Pentium 4 CPUs, with much lower production costs.[5]</p>
<p>Unlike processors from Intel, Advanced Micro Devices or Via Technologies, the Godson-2E is not based on the x86 instruction set. Instead, the chip uses a modified version of the MIPS instruction set that replaces proprietary instructions with ones developed by ICT. This means the Godson 2E cannot be used in PCs running Microsoft&#39;s Windows XP operating system, and thus the computing devices based on the Godson 2E would be most likely running the Linux operating system.</p>
<p>The processor runs at a clock speed of 1 GHz and like other chips in the Godson family, the Godson 2E was designed by the Chinese Academy of Science&#39;s Institute of Computing Technology (ICT) and was the first Chinese CPU produced using 90-nanometer process technology. Earlier versions of the Godson 2 chip were produced using a 180-nanometer process and ran at clock speeds up to 500 MHz. The Godson 2E CPU contains 47 million transistors, more than the 42 million of the original Pentium 4. Battery drain will be less, with power consumption between 3 to 8 watts, according to CAE Fellow Li Guojie (李国杰), director of the ICT. Li Guojie also announced that at the end of 2006, scientists would start to upgrade Godson 2E to Godson 2F, which will improve performance by about 30% and reduces power consumption by about 50%. It was announced that the Godson-3 is scheduled to enter production by 2008.</p>
<p>In January 2007 Gentoo Linux was ported on this machine, the initial port was compiled on a Cobalt Qube micro-server.</p>
<p>According to the table on Wikipedia, there are parts ranging down to 200 MHz, but a part that starts at 400 MHz was used in a 100 Euro computer 2 1/2  years ago, and there have been Linux ports. Hopefully the specs will be in the ballpark of the Razorbook, though Nate was right to point out that even that is still speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coby to intro sub-$100 “Midget PC” - HiTech Review</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10873</link>
		<dc:creator>Coby to intro sub-$100 “Midget PC” - HiTech Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10873</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: Liliputing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: Liliputing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fu Long</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/12/coby-to-intro-sub-100-midget-pc.html#comment-10871</link>
		<dc:creator>Fu Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3420#comment-10871</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://arkansas.indymedia.org/node/5935&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://arkansas.indymedia.org/newswire/display/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Also, the computers will be made in Coby&#039;s own factory in Foshan China. They will employ Loongson processors, a brand of the People&#039;s Republic of China, not a household name but known to be reliable.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://arkansas.indymedia.org/node/5935" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://arkansas.indymedia.org/newswire/display/" rel="nofollow">http://arkansas.indymedia.org/newswire/display/</a>&#8230;<br />&#8220;Also, the computers will be made in Coby&#39;s own factory in Foshan China. They will employ Loongson processors, a brand of the People&#39;s Republic of China, not a household name but known to be reliable.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

