Comments on: AMD unveils product roadmap, includes ultraportable focus http://liliputing.com/2008/11/amd-unveils-prodcut-roadmap.html Compact Computing Thu, 24 May 2012 22:04:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: EV http://liliputing.com/2008/11/amd-unveils-prodcut-roadmap.html#comment-46884 EV Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:12:56 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=2991#comment-46884 Brad - an interesting read here <a href="http://www.netbooktech.com/2008/11/13/amd-focused-on-the-ultra-portable-market-for-now/" rel="nofollow">http://www.netbooktech.com/2008/11/13/amd-focus...</a> which claims the TPD of Intel+Chipset is 11.5W (less than half of the proposed AMD setup.) Brad – an interesting read here http://www.netbooktech.com/2008/11/13/amd-focus… which claims the TPD of Intel+Chipset is 11.5W (less than half of the proposed AMD setup.)

]]> By: EV http://liliputing.com/2008/11/amd-unveils-prodcut-roadmap.html#comment-5579 EV Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:12:56 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=2991#comment-5579 Brad - an interesting read here <a href="http://www.netbooktech.com/2008/11/13/amd-focused-on-the-ultra-portable-market-for-now/">http://www.netbooktech.com/2008/11/13/amd-focus...</a> which claims the TPD of Intel+Chipset is 11.5W (less than half of the proposed AMD setup.) Brad – an interesting read here http://www.netbooktech.com/2008/11/13/amd-focus… which claims the TPD of Intel+Chipset is 11.5W (less than half of the proposed AMD setup.)

]]> By: EV http://liliputing.com/2008/11/amd-unveils-prodcut-roadmap.html#comment-4535 EV Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:12:56 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=2991#comment-4535 Brad - an interesting read here <a href="http://www.netbooktech.com/2008/11/13/amd-focused-on-the-ultra-portable-market-for-now/">http://www.netbooktech.com/2008/11/13/amd-focus...</a> which claims the TPD of Intel+Chipset is 11.5W (less than half of the proposed AMD setup.) Brad – an interesting read here http://www.netbooktech.com/2008/11/13/amd-focus… which claims the TPD of Intel+Chipset is 11.5W (less than half of the proposed AMD setup.)

]]> By: BoloMKXXVIII http://liliputing.com/2008/11/amd-unveils-prodcut-roadmap.html#comment-4530 BoloMKXXVIII Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:33:36 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=2991#comment-4530 Read a bit more here:<br><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/processors/212002483?subSection=News" rel="nofollow">http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/pr...</a> Read a bit more here:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/pr…

]]> By: Rick Reemus http://liliputing.com/2008/11/amd-unveils-prodcut-roadmap.html#comment-4523 Rick Reemus Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:19:48 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=2991#comment-4523 I am actually pretty psyched, but the question is "when?" If I only need to pay an extra $100 to get a larger screen, better graphics, better video, and possibly a better Flash 10 experience, I think that's OK. Same logic that people have migrated from the 7" to 10", I think that some will prefer going from the 10" to the 12". Thoughts? I am actually pretty psyched, but the question is “when?” If I only need to pay an extra $100 to get a larger screen, better graphics, better video, and possibly a better Flash 10 experience, I think that's OK. Same logic that people have migrated from the 7″ to 10″, I think that some will prefer going from the 10″ to the 12″. Thoughts?

]]> By: REMF http://liliputing.com/2008/11/amd-unveils-prodcut-roadmap.html#comment-4522 REMF Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:56:47 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=2991#comment-4522 A netbook format, but not using the fusion CPU/GPU single package, i wonder what it is............<br><br>low-power dual-core Phenom II at .045u and probably around 1.6GHz<br>low-power 780G chipset at .055u, hopefully paired with the SB750<br><br>Could be a very compelling product when put in a 10" chassis! A netbook format, but not using the fusion CPU/GPU single package, i wonder what it is…………

low-power dual-core Phenom II at .045u and probably around 1.6GHz
low-power 780G chipset at .055u, hopefully paired with the SB750

Could be a very compelling product when put in a 10″ chassis!

]]> By: thequinox http://liliputing.com/2008/11/amd-unveils-prodcut-roadmap.html#comment-4519 thequinox Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:21:30 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=2991#comment-4519 Yeah, I didn't expect much from AMD, and it doesn't look like they delivered much. This seals the deal on the NC10 for me... though I hate having to import a black one from the UK. Why Samsung why? Yeah, I didn't expect much from AMD, and it doesn't look like they delivered much. This seals the deal on the NC10 for me… though I hate having to import a black one from the UK. Why Samsung why?

]]> By: Chris http://liliputing.com/2008/11/amd-unveils-prodcut-roadmap.html#comment-4518 Chris Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:17:50 +0000 http://www.liliputing.com/?p=2991#comment-4518 "This chip will likely consume more power, and cost more. In other words, it sounds to me like a chip for small laptops, not necessarily small, cheap laptops"<br><br>Exactly as I've said. AMD can't make a cheap and small notebook processor using their existing tech. So they've got to shoot for a different market. Of course what you'll probably see them doing is producing something with decent integrated graphics and trying to market it to the same people who would buy the Asus N10; all seven of them. ;) “This chip will likely consume more power, and cost more. In other words, it sounds to me like a chip for small laptops, not necessarily small, cheap laptops”

Exactly as I've said. AMD can't make a cheap and small notebook processor using their existing tech. So they've got to shoot for a different market. Of course what you'll probably see them doing is producing something with decent integrated graphics and trying to market it to the same people who would buy the Asus N10; all seven of them. ;)

]]>