liliputing logo
Facebook Twitter Gplus YouTube RSS
  • Home
  • Products
  • Top News
  • Reviews
  • Deals
  • Mini PCs
  • Contact
  • About
 

VIA starts shipping its Intel Atom competitor, the VIA Nano

  • Tweet

The Intel Atom CPU has been all the rage this summer with netbook makers. Companies including Dell, Lenovo, Toshiba, Acer, and Asus have all released or announced low cost ultraportable laptops sporting the power saving CPU.  And chip maker VIA wants in on the action.

VIA’s C7-M CPU shows up in a handful of current generation netbooks, most notably the HP Mini-Note and the Everex Cloudbook. But the C7-M CPU is significantly slower than the Intel Atom. VIA’s been working on a replacement for much of the year, and now the new VIA Nano CPU is finally shipping. 

The Nano consumes more than twice the power of the Intel Atom. But thanks to it’s architecture, it could offer better performance for some CPU-intensive tasks. And the chip is designed so that manufacturers offering computers with a VIA C7-M chip today can easily upgrade to the Nano tomorrow with just a few tweaks.

That said, it could be a little while before we see any Nano-based netbooks on the market. At the moment VIA is shipping the chip to computer makers for machines that are still in development or in the early manufacturing stages. Still, it sounds like we could see a netbook or two with the VIA Nano processor by the end of the year. HP, I’m looking at you.

Posted on Friday, September 26th, 2008, 4:32 pm by Brad Linder | 6 Comments




  • BoloMKXXVIII

    Uses more than twice the power of the Atom!!! I was hoping Intel would get some competition, but I will pass on the Nano. The Atom has enough power for anything I would do with a netbook and Intel is bringing out their dual core Atoms right now. I guess if Intel is going to get any real competition it will have to come from AMD, the Chinese or from one of the ARM processors.

  • Dan

    It's true the Nano draws more power. That's not as useful a metric as it might seem though. The CPU+chipset of the Nano does seem to be more efficient at idle load. The Nano also more often than not manage to do the same work using less energy.

  • Pingback: Совершенствование Lenovo IdeaPad S10 и таблетка Eee PC | аналоги | Eee-PC.ru

  • Dan

    It's true the Nano draws more power. That's not as useful a metric as it might seem though. The CPU+chipset of the Nano does seem to be more efficient at idle load. The Nano also more often than not manage to do the same work using less energy.

  • Pingback: VIA versendet die ersten Nano CPUs - Dualcore in Entwicklung | Eee PC News

  • Dan

    It's true the Nano draws more power. That's not as useful a metric as it might seem though. The CPU+chipset of the Nano does seem to be more efficient at idle load. The Nano also more often than not manage to do the same work using less energy.

Featured Articles

  • G-Box Midnight MX2 dual-core TV box is made for Android, XBMC
  • Tronsmart MK908 quad-core Android TV stick performance (video)
  • Asus MeMO Pad 7 inch, $149 Android tablet review

Mini PC comparison table

View and contribute to a community database

Recent Posts

  • Google H840 media player hits the FCC: Next Nexus Q?
  • Dell Project Ophelia Android TV stick coming this summer for $100
  • Lilbits (5-17-2013): Linux Mint 15, Ubuntu on Glass, end of the Kindle Keyboard?

Popular Discussions

Powered by Disqus

Featured Video

  • G-Box Midnight MX2 Android TV box with XBMC (video review)
    G-Box Midnight MX2 Android TV box with XBMC (video review)


2007-2013 Liliputing

Advertising | Privacy | TOP