<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to replace the SSD in the Acer Aspire One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liliputing.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-the-ssd-in-the-acer-aspire-one.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-the-ssd-in-the-acer-aspire-one.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: geng stars</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-the-ssd-in-the-acer-aspire-one.html#comment-96325</link>
		<dc:creator>geng stars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=372#comment-96325</guid>
		<description>Try download flashfire for ssd and install it...... then feel the difference. good luck......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try download flashfire for ssd and install it&#8230;&#8230; then feel the difference. good luck&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-the-ssd-in-the-acer-aspire-one.html#comment-96157</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=372#comment-96157</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve installed XP on my granddaughter&#039;s Aspire One and I&#039;ve increased the ram to 1gb but it is very slow. If it is unnecessary writing that&#039;s causing the problem how do I turn it off? I would be very grateful if anyone could help. Thanks      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve installed XP on my granddaughter&#8217;s Aspire One and I&#8217;ve increased the ram to 1gb but it is very slow. If it is unnecessary writing that&#8217;s causing the problem how do I turn it off? I would be very grateful if anyone could help. Thanks     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: margol</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-the-ssd-in-the-acer-aspire-one.html#comment-45471</link>
		<dc:creator>margol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=372#comment-45471</guid>
		<description>1. What SSD do you have, slow Intel or fast (relatively) Samsung ? &lt;br&gt;2. Have you noticed significant drawbacks of such large clusters (waste space) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. What SSD do you have, slow Intel or fast (relatively) Samsung ? <br />2. Have you noticed significant drawbacks of such large clusters (waste space) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: margol</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-the-ssd-in-the-acer-aspire-one.html#comment-17123</link>
		<dc:creator>margol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=372#comment-17123</guid>
		<description>1. What SSD do you have, slow Intel or fast (relatively) Samsung ? &lt;br&gt;2. Have you noticed significant drawbacks of such large clusters (waste space) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. What SSD do you have, slow Intel or fast (relatively) Samsung ? <br />2. Have you noticed significant drawbacks of such large clusters (waste space) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-the-ssd-in-the-acer-aspire-one.html#comment-14663</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=372#comment-14663</guid>
		<description>read 38, write 15</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>read 38, write 15</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-the-ssd-in-the-acer-aspire-one.html#comment-14662</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=372#comment-14662</guid>
		<description>hey, where is the benchmark? I changed the cluster size from 4k to 32k on my FAT32 and the speed is pretty good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, where is the benchmark? I changed the cluster size from 4k to 32k on my FAT32 and the speed is pretty good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-the-ssd-in-the-acer-aspire-one.html#comment-11284</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=372#comment-11284</guid>
		<description>The write speed is the problem with the laptop. As a matter of face, the read speed is pretty decent,  I think the Aspire One has one of the fastest boot up time in the os that i have ever experience. After i install window xp, it is still very fast to boot up, but once you trying to do something........ The HD version is a lot better in terms of speed (but is heavier and have a spining hard drive.....mm.......I think i&#039;ll get a cf to swap the ssd instead....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The write speed is the problem with the laptop. As a matter of face, the read speed is pretty decent,  I think the Aspire One has one of the fastest boot up time in the os that i have ever experience. After i install window xp, it is still very fast to boot up, but once you trying to do something&#8230;&#8230;.. The HD version is a lot better in terms of speed (but is heavier and have a spining hard drive&#8230;..mm&#8230;&#8230;.I think i&#39;ll get a cf to swap the ssd instead&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sesummers</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-the-ssd-in-the-acer-aspire-one.html#comment-4827</link>
		<dc:creator>sesummers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=372#comment-4827</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not the read-speed, it&#039;s the write-speed. XP writes to the disk almost constantly.  Supposedly, if you turn off most of the unnecessary writing, XP works OK.  There&#039;s also a thread about using the &quot;enhanced write filtering&quot; DLL&#039;s from Embedded XP to cache all writes to the flash until/unless you tell it to commit. That apparently makes the thing fly - at the risk of losing things like installed software and registry changes.  But for that, it helps to have more than 512M of RAM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s not the read-speed, it&#39;s the write-speed. XP writes to the disk almost constantly.  Supposedly, if you turn off most of the unnecessary writing, XP works OK.  There&#39;s also a thread about using the &#8220;enhanced write filtering&#8221; DLL&#39;s from Embedded XP to cache all writes to the flash until/unless you tell it to commit. That apparently makes the thing fly &#8211; at the risk of losing things like installed software and registry changes.  But for that, it helps to have more than 512M of RAM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sesummers</title>
		<link>http://liliputing.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-the-ssd-in-the-acer-aspire-one.html#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>sesummers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=372#comment-401</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not the read-speed, it&#039;s the write-speed. XP writes to the disk almost constantly.  Supposedly, if you turn off most of the unnecessary writing, XP works OK.  There&#039;s also a thread about using the &quot;enhanced write filtering&quot; DLL&#039;s from Embedded XP to cache all writes to the flash until/unless you tell it to commit. That apparently makes the thing fly - at the risk of losing things like installed software and registry changes.  But for that, it helps to have more than 512M of RAM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not the read-speed, it&#8217;s the write-speed. XP writes to the disk almost constantly.  Supposedly, if you turn off most of the unnecessary writing, XP works OK.  There&#8217;s also a thread about using the &#8220;enhanced write filtering&#8221; DLL&#8217;s from Embedded XP to cache all writes to the flash until/unless you tell it to commit. That apparently makes the thing fly &#8211; at the risk of losing things like installed software and registry changes.  But for that, it helps to have more than 512M of RAM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

